backtop


Print 61 comment(s) - last by retrospooty.. on May 29 at 3:08 AM


  (Source: Trolls News)
Unable to compete, the Cupertino company claims that Google and Samsung stole features from Siri

Given that the massive Galaxy S IV doesn't look too much like the much smaller 4-inch iPhone 5, Apple Inc. (AAPL) is having to turn to new and creative routes to try to convince federal judges and juries to ban its competitor’s flagship product.

I. Apple Targets Samsung Again

Samsung is doing quite well with the Galaxy S IV, moving 10 million units in a mere four weeks.  Overall Samsung is outselling Apple 2-to-1 in unit sales.  In addition, Samsung is approaching Apple in profitability for the first time; while Apple has seen its own profit margins slide for the first time in years.

Thus it is perhaps expected that Apple would be return to its favorite tactic -- looking to troll Samsung in court.

Galaxy S IV
The Samsung Galaxy S IV

Its latest accusation is that Google Inc.’s (GOOG) Android "Google Now" service violates five invention claims that Apple has patented, with respect to its Siri voice search/assistant that it co-designed with Nuance Communications Inc. (NUAN).

The patents asserted are:

13-05-21 Apple Motion to Amend Infringement Contentions



But wait, you say, what could patents filed at least four years before Siri was released (or ten or more years in most cases) have to do with Siri or Google Now?  And what in the world do graphical user interface patents (the latter two patents from the 90s) have to do with voice search?

II. Apple Looks to Use Ambiguous Decade-Old Patents Against Samsung

Apple contends that the trio of initial patents -- which cover interaction with ambiguous data constructs -- can be applied to Siri, Google Now, (or likely most other pieces of software).  And Apple says its equally ambiguous UI "inventions" are fair game, as Google Now is activated by an on-screen button at times, replacing the previous "Android Quick Search Box".

According to a filing obtained by Florian Mueller, an anti-Google blogger paid by Google's legal rivals, Apple writes, "The Galaxy S4 product practices many of the same claims already asserted by Apple… in the same way as the already-accused Samsung devices."
 

Unable to compete, Apple is helping the courts lend it a helping hand in its war against Samsung. [Image Source: Cult of Mac]
 
Judge Paul S. Grewal of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California will rule on Apple's request to tack on the patents at a June 25 hearing.  

As Samsung and Apple wind up to a second trial, in which Apple is targeting dozens of Samsung smartphones and tablets for bans, the Cupertino company is watching its first $1.05B USD court win over Samsung start to unravel with a pair of patent invalidations by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).  Apple also failed to secure any lasting bans on current Samsung products in that case.

Sources: AppleInsider, Scribd



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: There is no bias here...
By Kaldor on 5/23/2013 2:22:45 PM , Rating: 1
"Complain and cry" This is where the IT manager needs to step up and say "EF OFF". Your boss, or your boss' boss needs to grow a pair. The security risks with Mac products, as you pointed out, are FAR too high and the cost of investing in another server for a handful of "special snowflakes" is not worth the money.

We do allow users to user our guest wireless network for their phones and tablets for data, Apple and Android alike. However we do not allow Macs to have access to the network. Its hard lined in this company. There have been people that have asked, and it only made it past my desk once, and at that point it was addressed with the manager of our company. It was squashed from the start, as it should be. Cowing to the requests from a few only opens a Pandoras box that is really hard to close.

And this is not because I am an Apple hater. In fact I think they make some really nice stuff, for the home office or user. However the extra work and money needed to do this is just not worth it unless your IT budget is flush with cash. Apple maybe should spend a little time making their products able to be managed via MS group policy if they want to be serious in the workplace. Until they do that, they wont be taken seriously. The other side of the Apple problem is the cost. I can buy 2 fast Dell workstations for the cost of a single Apple with mediocre specs.

Apple, great for home, shite for the domain/business environment.


RE: There is no bias here...
By cyberguyz on 5/28/2013 6:47:46 AM , Rating: 2
Not sure what fairy tale world you are living in there, but an IT Manager is pretty low on the corporate ladder. He doesn't get an awful lot to say about it when his CIO says "Support MACs. I don't care how you do it, make it happen. Today. And make sure they are secure!". Just what do you think would happen to that IT manager if he were 'grow a pair" to turn around and say "EFF OFF!"? I suspect there would be a new IT manager installing MACs half an hour after the old one was escorted out the front door, balls and all, by Big Biff the security guard.


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki