Obama's DOJ Caught Spying on Associated Press in Hunt for Leakers
May 14, 2013 8:44 AM
comment(s) - last by
(Source: Fits News)
Government hunts for source of leaks inside its ranks, tramples freedom of press
A federal judge approves sweeping subpoenas of over 20 phone numbers associated with a top national journalist organization, hunting for the source of government leaks to the press. No, this isn't a tale of Soviet Russia (or Putin-era Russia); it's the story that's breaking here in the "land of the free".
I. Big Brother is Watching the Press
In an outraged letter to
U.S. Attorney General (AG) Eric Holder
, one of the nation's largest news organizations, accuses the
U.S. Department of Justice
(DOJ) of a potentially serious violation of freedom of the press. According to the letter from Gary Pruitt, records from 20 phone lines -- including personal phones of AP editors/columnists and AP business phone numbers in New York; Hartford, Connecticut; and Washington -- were subpoenaed in a "massive and unprecedented" attempt to monitor on the press.
These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP's newsgathering operations and disclose information about AP's activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know.
We regard this action by the Department of Justice as a serious interference with AP's constitutional rights to gather and report the news.
He demanded that the DOJ return all records collected and destroy all copies of them.
President Obama's Justice Department stands accused of spying on AP offices and staffers.
[Image Source: Getty Images]
The DOJ defended its actions in a statement, commenting:
We must notify the media organization in advance unless doing so would pose a substantial threat to the integrity of the investigation. Because we value the freedom of the press, we are always careful and deliberative in seeking to strike the right balance between the public interest in the free flow of information and the public interest in the fair and effective administration of our criminal laws.
The AP was not told why the records were subpoenaed, but it is aware that some of the employees whose records were subpoenaed were involved in a story in which an undisclosed government official leaked an account of a foiled May 2012 bomb plot on an aircraft flying into the U.S.
Fresh off outrage over his support of
drone death strikes on Americans
on U.S. soil, AG Eric Holder has another controversy to contend with. [Image Source: AP]
Analysts say that the Obama administration has pushed the limits farther than any administration before it in hunting for leakers in its ranks with surveillance and subpoenas.
II. The Hunt for Leakers
In this case there has been no signal yet that the feds wiretapped the reporters in question. However, some top politicians are already questioning the Obama administration's "Big Brother" tactics.
Michael Steel, spokesperson for
Rep. John Boehner
(R-Ohio), the Speaker of the House, "The First Amendment is first for a reason. If the Obama administration is going after reporters' phone records, they better have a damned (sic) good explanation."
President Obama has been frustrated with leakers in his ranks. [Image Source: AP]
Ben Wizner, the head of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, also
against the spying, commenting:
Obtaining a broad range of telephone records in order to ferret out a government leaker is an unacceptable abuse of power. Freedom of the press is a pillar of our democracy, and that freedom often depends on confidential communications between reporters and their sources.
The development even made some members of the President's own party queasy.
Sen. Patrick Leahy
(D-Verm.) commented, "I am very troubled by these allegations and want to hear the government's explanation. The burden is always on the government when they go after private information -- especially information regarding the press or its confidential sources. I want to know more about this case, but on the face of it, I am concerned that the government may not have met that burden."
The Obama administration has dramatically
increased warrantless surveillance
in the U.S. on American citizens over the last five years in the name of fighting "crime" and "terrorism". However, it came under scrutiny this last week when it was revealed that the
U.S. Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) targeted members of the Tea Party and other pro-change groups with tax audits. It should be interesting to see how the Attorney General and President Obama justify these latest actions in weeks to come.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
5/17/2013 4:55:13 AM
Since you want to back your assertions from a blog, which claims facts are facts just because they list it. Here is something I came across another blog from a commenter which better refutes your blog assertions:
"Neither of those acts forced anyone to make any loans. The risky loans were originated by banks and other financial institutions of their own volition. The policies of the federal government which sought to increase home-ownership generally are bad for other reasons, but didn't cause the recession. You should also be careful to distinguish government policies which prevented discrimination against minority applicants for home loans and those which sought to increase home ownership generally.
And if you really think that the government first started promoted housing in the suburbs under Carter, it's because you found your preferred answer and stopped looking. That's just when they decided to try to make it fair. After the second world war, it was the policy of Housing and Urban Development for many years to subsidize home loans, exclusively for white applicants. Again, this is inefficient for many reasons, but it undeniably helped white people to maintain their unwarranted leads in income and education, among other things. It's amazing to me that conservatives have concluded that government helping citizens directly is a horrible thing, now that it's inclusive, and as a result they are forced to simply ignore enormous transfer payments that took place before the time period they arbitrarily choose to examine.
It's also plainly absurd for you to single out a policy from 1977 for a bubble that began around 2000. Housing prices were on a steady upward trend before that (some fluctuation of course), and are actually still roughly in line with that trend.
The financial collapse wasn't caused by falling home prices. It was caused by the repackaging of the mortgages into mortgage-backed securities, and then the repackaging of those mortgage-backed securities into supposedly safe, but truly very risky derivatives. For a good treatment of this, I would recommend Michael Lewis's book, "The Big Short". Banks then leveraged their borrowing to the point where for some of them, as small as a 2% decline in their portfolio would leave them in the red. It's unclear to me whether it was incompetence or fraud that caused the spread of the contagion of mortgage-backed securities, but it looks like both. This recklessness is what caused the collapse. Bubbles happen. Financial markets speculate. But they don't always cause general collapse. The difference was that the risks were poorly understood and spread throughout the entire economy. "
Link if you want to read all:
Here's a link to the actual Act to read what the Act was created to address:
And here is what I consider a more objective view of what the cause of the mortgage was, but if you want to keep the political blinders on:
Using a blog to justify one's position is incredulous, but whatever you want to glean your facts from is up to you. I prefer to trust wikipedia a bit more than a blog as there are references but blogs typically don't provide legitimate references.
"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan
Obama, FBI Silence Critics, Plan Warrantless VoIP Wiretaps, ISP Fines
May 8, 2013, 9:40 AM
Obama's AG Won't Rule Out Drone Death Strikes on U.S. Soil
March 6, 2013, 12:34 PM
Motorola Further Increases Moto 360 Battery Life with New Update
October 22, 2014, 8:08 AM
Apple's iPad Air 2 Features Triple-core A8X Processor, 2GB of RAM
October 21, 2014, 8:32 PM
Toshiba Launches 11”, 2-in-1 Convertible PC for $329
October 21, 2014, 2:11 PM
Microsoft Begins Shifting Nokia Lumia Branding to "Microsoft Lumia"
October 21, 2014, 10:52 AM
Tim Cook Touts Apple’s Product Portfolio, Performance in Letter to Employees
October 21, 2014, 8:05 AM
Buoyed by Strong iPhone Sales, Apple Reports Revenue of $42.1B, $8.5B in Profit for Fiscal Q4
October 20, 2014, 5:21 PM
Most Popular Articles
Cool Science Video of the Day: Carnivorous Leech Eats Giant Jungle Worm
October 16, 2014, 6:44 PM
HBO, CBS Lead Charge to Ditch Cable
October 16, 2014, 4:40 PM
PS4 "Masamune" Update 2.0 Will Bring New Music and Customization Features
October 17, 2014, 1:05 PM
Report: 2015 Ford Focus Electric MSRP Slashed by $6,000, Will Retail for $29,995
October 18, 2014, 6:23 PM
Apple Announces iPad Air 2, iPad mini 3, 27" iMac with Retina Display
October 16, 2014, 1:22 PM
Latest Blog Posts
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information