Print 43 comment(s) - last by Cheesew1z69.. on May 13 at 3:01 PM

Apple is reportedly a huge fan of Metro and is "borrowing" its design, but won't help Windows 8 out

Windows 8 has its fair share of detractors, but its latest struggle has been with a snub from Apple, Inc. (AAPL).  While Apple designers are reportedly looking towards a "flatter" UI for iOS 7 a la the Metro/Windows 8 UI, they don’t appear to be in any rush to bring out a Metro version of iTunes for Microsoft Corp.’s (MSFT) Windows 8 operating system.

Microsoft's Windows chief financial officer Tami Reller complains, "You shouldn't expect an iTunes app on Windows 8 any time soon.  ITunes is in high demand. The welcome mat has been laid out. It's not for lack of trying."

While Apple has not officially dropped support for the Windows platform -- its largest iTunes customer base -- it's not putting much effort into it either.  Windows 8 and Windows 8 Pro users can still access the legacy iTunes, but only in desktop mode.  Windows RT users (not that there are many of them -- reportedly only 200,000 Windows RT tablets sold in Q1 2013) can't access iTunes at all, as Windows RT only runs Microsoft-approved apps compiled to run on the ARM architecture.

While Ms. Reller says that Microsoft firmly believes in its first-party Xbox Music app, she acknowledges that Apple's music store remains the most popular digital music store.  That's why she's so frustrated at the snub.

Xbox Surface

Despite (relatively) weak sales of Microsoft's first-party Surface Pro and Surface RT tablets, Apple is reportedly concerned that designing a Metro app could make the playing field a little too level between the iPad and Surface.

So far 100 million Windows 8/RT licenses have been sold, so there's probably > 50 million Windows 8/RT users in the wild to be conservative.  That's a lot of customers to overlook.

It remains to be seen whether the move backfires on Apple.  After all, Windows users have access to other digital music stories such as Google Inc.'s (GOOG) Play music store and, Inc.'s (AMZN) Amazon MP3 service -- both of which are reportedly working on Metro editions of their music marketplace apps (Google recently released a Metro edition of its YouTube app, so it knows a thing or two about developing for the platform).  And then there's Microsoft's own bundled offering.

If Apple refuses to play ball with Metro, it may see purchases from Windows users decline.  And while Apple typically would cheer at Microsoft's loss, in this case that loss might be mutual.

Source: CNN Money

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Maybe
By BRB29 on 5/10/2013 2:36:41 PM , Rating: 2
I'm pretty sure the idea is that a ton of people have hundreds to thousands of dollars invested into itunes. Apple will not let you transfer it to other means besides their devices and a CD burn.
Microsoft wants to sell more tablets so it's better for them to let apple have their itunes on their OS. doesn't want to help their competitor sell more tablets.

RE: Maybe
By inighthawki on 5/10/2013 4:04:33 PM , Rating: 2
It's a two way street. Having a popular product on another platform gives you more music sales too. It's a matter of whether or not it's worth it.

RE: Maybe
By inverse137 on 5/10/2013 4:26:11 PM , Rating: 2
That's not true. I have apple computers, apple tv, apple everything....except I have an android phone.

At first I thought I had to copy the entire itunes library to flash card but then I just installed Google Music on my Mac and Google Music synced to the Cloud. I now have everything on Mac and iCloud and everything on my Android.

True, it is not a bi-directional sync. For example, my Playlists do not update. But, my entire library is available on Google Music and therefor my android phone.

RE: Maybe
By BRB29 on 5/13/2013 7:59:51 AM , Rating: 2
So you're confirming what I'm saying.

I'm pretty sure the reason why it kinda works is because of google and not Apple. Have you ever looked at the actual files for your itunes music? It's all randomized and the names are gibberish intentionally. It's made so it won't play well with others. The fact that Apple made no official way to transfer it is confirmation.

That's like saying the B&N Nook is better than the Ipad mini because you can do install a hacked OS on it. No, it's better because it's significantly cheaper.

"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki