backtop


Print 10 comment(s) - last by thesafetyisoff.. on May 12 at 1:40 AM

Former military officer lashes out at reports that his company's hardware could be used for spying

China's Huawei Technologies Comp. (SHE:002502performed well in 2012, posting major growth, particularly in the smartphone sector.  But the company suffered a major black mark during the year -- scrutiny by U.S. regulators over security concerns.  Huawei was accused of funneling telecommunications equipment illegally to Iran.  And while an investigation vindicated Huawei of spying accusations, it did suggest that the Chinese government could leverage its relationship with Huawei as a spying route in the future.

Now Huawei's founder and CEO, Ren Zhengfei, 68, is speaking out angrily about the accusations, breaking the wall of silence that surrounded him since the allegations were made last year.  Mr. Ren, a former officer in China's People's Liberation Army (PLA), has avoided media interviews for years.  Instead he would only communicate via posts to his company's website, only occasionally appearing publicly at economic forums and other non-company events.

But in his first major press appearance in Huawei history, he spoke with reporters this week in New Zealand.  On the prospect of a U.S. ban on Huawei smartphone and router sales, he comments, "Huawei has no connection to the cyber-security issues the U.S. has encountered in the past, current and future.  Huawei equipment is almost non-existent in networks currently running in the U.S. We have never sold any key equipment to major U.S. carriers, nor have we sold any equipment to any U.S. government agency."

Ren Zhengfei
Ren Zhengfei, former PLA officer and current Huawei CEO at a 2012 economics summit in St. Petersburg, Russia. [Image Source: Reuters]

He's right -- there is no Huawei equipment on U.S. government networks ... because it is banned.

The international community remains divided on the issue of Huawei and security, amid record levels of Chinese digital spying.  Canada and Australia joined the U.S. in banning Huawei's telecommunications equipment from government networks. 

However, Britain recently offered up a dissenting take when its government security experts declared Huawei fully vetted and capable of bidding on government contracts.  And Mr. Ren's comments came in New Zealand at a press event for its new 4G LTE and ultra-fast broadband networks contracts in the nation.

Huawei router
Huawei's routers are reportedly riddled with security holes -- some of which some analyst claim are deliberate back doors. [Image Source: The Hacker News]
 
Huawei is currently the world's second largest telecommunications equipment maker and fifth largest smartphone maker.  The 26-year old company is estimated to be worth $35B USD.

Source: AP on Yahoo! News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

So then why did you murder Shane Todd?
By thesafetyisoff on 5/9/2013 5:53:22 PM , Rating: 1
Still waiting to hear from the FBI on that.




RE: So then why did you murder Shane Todd?
By Rukkian on 5/10/2013 9:40:50 AM , Rating: 2
WTF does this have to do with this article?


RE: So then why did you murder Shane Todd?
By kleinma on 5/10/2013 10:00:57 AM , Rating: 2
He worked for Huawei until he got nervous that what he was developing was a threat to US security. Then he was dead.


By thesafetyisoff on 5/12/2013 1:40:45 AM , Rating: 2
Thank you. Who knew that needed an explanation?


will never trust them
By sixteenornumber on 5/10/2013 5:53:45 AM , Rating: 4
Following them for the last couple years I don't think I can trust them ever again.




so what ?
By KOOLTIME on 5/10/2013 12:55:03 PM , Rating: 2
No so called real SPY/hacker would ever use some off the shelf hardware from any country at all regardless of maker in the 1st place.

They would never use a pre-made item, other then to take some parts and mod them, themselves so its undetectable, aka no mac address and other such things like the normal equipment has.




RE: so what ?
By fteoath64 on 5/11/2013 5:46:57 AM , Rating: 2
The implied security threat is not the originator site per se. But the intermediate site routers that can be used as attach vectors and/or disguise as origin points to mask the real identity of the hacker. The TOR network is a good example of a true anonimizer where origin points cannot be tracked. Using an intermediate equipment or server has been a key method for smart hackers to launch their attacks or snoops. It itself acts as a server on the network with multiple network ports and capabilities to spoof Ip addresses or poof them to oblivion.


Yea...
By kypd275 on 5/9/2013 7:48:51 PM , Rating: 3
I'm sure those "Nigerian Princes" that always seems to be sending out emails to people to shower them with mysterious magical money also insists they're legit too :p




Circuit boards are scary
By ShaolinSoccer on 5/9/2013 8:10:20 PM , Rating: 2
No country has the man-power to check every single circuit board for illegal activity. That being said, we DO have the power to check packets. The problem is WHEN to check them. This sounds like a losing battle.




What else can he say?
By bug77 on 5/10/2013 6:10:47 AM , Rating: 2
The Spanish conquistadors presented themselves as friends, too, when they crossed the ocean. Hitler was a great friend of Stalin. And so on.




"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki