Print 26 comment(s) - last by Regs.. on May 10 at 4:48 PM

It will have a range of 9,500 nautical miles

Boeing has started selling a new aircraft family – codenamed 777X – which will feature the world’s longest-range jet for passengers.
The new family will be upgraded versions of Boeing’s popular 777 wide-body jet. Its most popular (and profitable) plane is the 777-300ER, which is a 365-seat jet that launched in 2004.
As for the new 777X family, Boeing has been showing off two members to airlines – the 400-seat 777-9X, and the long-distance 777-8X.
While the 777-9X is meant to be the competitor to the Airbus A350-1000, the 777-8X would be the king of distance with a range of 9,500 nautical miles.
The 777-8X would be the successor to Boeing’s current winner of distance, the 777-200LR.
While long-distance jets are considered a niche (mainly due to the fact that the first few hours of long flights are spent burning fuel to carry even more fuel needed for the remainder of the flight), Boeing plans to offer the plane as an option for long trips from places like the Middle East to South America.
Sales of long-distance jets haven’t been too impressive. For instance, Boeing has only sold 59 777-200LRs since its debut in 2007. However, it has sold 687 short-range 777-300ER planes.
Because of this, Boeing expects to sell more 777-9X jets than 777-8Xs, but the two could go hand-in-hand as the 777-9X’s extra powerful engines and larger wings could give airlines more efficient use of the 777-8X.
The main model of the 777-9X is expected to be in service toward the end of the decade. There’s no word on when the 777-8X will be available.

Source: Yahoo News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Won't be used?
By Guspaz on 5/6/2013 1:09:08 PM , Rating: 2
Airlines already aren't using the range of existing aircraft...

Toronto to Sydney is 15,600 km

Air Canada serves that route with the 777-200LR, which has a fully loaded range of 17,370 km

The flight still lands to refuel in Vancouver anyhow, 12,500 km from Sydney...

RE: Won't be used?
By Jeffk464 on 5/6/2013 6:02:15 PM , Rating: 1
Seems like they should fly to LA or San Francisco and then cram everyone into an A380 for the trip to Sydney.

RE: Won't be used?
By Guspaz on 5/7/2013 11:13:21 AM , Rating: 2
It doesn't make sense for an Air Canada flight between a Canadian and an Australian city to pass through the US. Extra cost/complexity, and most passengers do NOT want to pass through US security if it can be avoided.

"I modded down, down, down, and the flames went higher." -- Sven Olsen

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki