AT&T U-verse IPTV, Internet Service Coming Soon
July 11, 2006 5:56 PM
comment(s) - last by
A sampling of the Uverse IPTV menu
The AT&T Uverse DVR, which unfortuantely lacks digital outputs
AT&T prepares to one-up broadband and cable TV providers with fiber services
AT&T is planning to roll out
television and internet services through Fiber to the Node
soon to compete with the likes of not only Verizon's FiOS services, but also with satellite and cable TV/Internet providers and DSL providers. The service is a two-part package: the first part is a modem for high speed internet, and the second part is a DVR service for IPTV.
The broadband internet service is a bit subdued, with three tiers: the Express package with a downstream bandwidth up to 1.5Mbps, a Pro package which features 3Mbps down, and the Elite option capable of 6Mbps downlink. All tiers have a 1Mbps upload speed and are each targeted at various types of users. Unfortunately when compared to the 20+ Mbps from FiOS or the experimental markets for 20Mbps Comcast HSI, 6Mbps seems sorely inadequate.
The television service will come packaged with broadband internet and will also come in 3 different packages. The U200+Internet package will start at $69/month and will feature 100+ channels, up to 3 receivers with 1 being a DVR model, 18 digital music channels, and the video-on-demand feature.
The U300+Internet package will feature 150+ channels, up to 3 receivers with 1 DVR, the 18 music channels and video-on-demand, as well as the movie package which contains 30+ premium channels including Starz, Encore, Showtime, The Movie Channel, and FLIX starting at around $89/month.
The top tier, U400+Internet will feature all of the options in the U300 package plus 25+ more channels, 9 HBO channels, 9 Cinemax channels, and the Sports Package which will include various channels with sports programming and will cost customers at least $114/month. An optional fourth receiver can also be added to each package along with a Spanish channel package.
AT&T's IPTV service will utilize a receiver with a built-in DVR from Tatung which will allow 80 hours of recordings on the 80GB hard drive. The service will also support video-on-demand similar to Comcast's On-Demand feature bundled with their cable TV service. However, AT&T claims there will also be options to configure the DVR from the internet, remotely as well as
other neat options (PDF)
that haven't been incorporated into Windows MCE or TiVo yet. Specifically, and perhaps the largest advantage in our opinion, is the ability for the Tatung DVR to broadcast IPTV to other devices on the network -- a feature TiVo and Comcast are working on, but haven't quite perfected yet. Unfortunately, the Tatung DVR is also completely outclassed when it comes to high fidelity outputs. The device has no HDMI or DVI capabilities.
Users will still have the option to add any of the premium programming to the first two tiers but they will, of course, pay a premium price. There is no word of high-definition programming on the official website but
around the internet are saying AT&T will be updating the receivers and services to support high definition programming in the future.
U-verse is starting to roll out in several areas, although the largest test market is currently San Antonio, Texas.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Why not a-la-carte IPTV?
7/11/2006 9:11:27 PM
Whatever happened to a-la-carte TV. Most consumers don't want 100+ channels. My hope was/is that IPTV will provide the option to select the 20 channels I want, nothing more or less. I feel these companies just don't get it. All they end up with is competing on price, the worst scenario to be in; airlines anyone? With IPTV it's time to go beyond the usual channel lineup. For example, I'd like to see international options with selections from most countries.
RE: Why not a-la-carte IPTV?
7/11/2006 10:51:49 PM
The FCC acted like they cared about a La Carte earlier this year. In the end, however, they "settled" with the cable companies on a new tier: the Family Plan.
RE: Why not a-la-carte IPTV?
7/11/2006 11:05:29 PM
And what a joke family plan is too. I watch exactly 7 channels, and I do not want to ever watch the others. I'd actually prefer it that way.
I think it needs to be the media companies that adopt new subscription methods rather than the cable companies. For example, I'd gladly pay for a "history channel premium" or something like that, where I'd get a bundle of history channels like with HBO.
But there's not a snowball's chance in hell any cable company (or satellite, or telco) would do something that benefits an average joe consumer like me.
"A lot of people pay zero for the cellphone ... That's what it's worth." -- Apple Chief Operating Officer Timothy Cook
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 - Battery Issue Fixed
August 30, 2016, 6:30 AM
First Apple Computer Auctions for $815,000
August 27, 2016, 7:51 AM
Lenovo vs. Asus vs. HP - Best Laptop Under $500.00
August 19, 2016, 4:00 AM
Best Router for Your Home Network (Under $200.00)
August 6, 2016, 9:51 PM
5 Top Rated Printers for Home or Small Office
July 29, 2016, 10:44 PM
Most Popular Articles
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM
FDA Cleared, Shockwave Lithoplasty for Peripheral Vascular Disease
September 22, 2016, 5:45 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Are you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Burlington Gun Attack
Sep 27, 2016, 5:00 AM
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information