Print 37 comment(s) - last by marvdmartian.. on Apr 29 at 8:00 AM

The GSA plans to replace aging vehicle fleet with hybrids

The United States General Services Administration (GSA) has announced a new Fleet consolidation initiative. The goal of this initiative is to replace a huge number of the federal government's existing vehicle fleet with new and more fuel-efficient hybrid vehicles. Up to 10,000 new hybrid vehicles would be purchased under this initiative.

The GSA says that it can reduce fuel consumption per year for the life of these vehicles by 1,000,000 gallons and that there will be significant savings earned through improved fuel efficiency.

2013 Ford Fusion Hybrid

“Providing a hybrid federal fleet is an essential part of GSA’s commitment to making government agencies as efficient and effective as possible,” said GSA Acting Administrator Dan Tangherlini. “At a time when government needs to make every tax dollar count, GSA is committed to creating more energy efficiency and cost-saving opportunities like the fleet consolidation program that make government smarter and reduce our environmental footprint.”

The initiative allows federal agencies to choose whether or not to participate in the program. If the agency chooses to participate, the GSA will fund the total incremental cost to replace eligible consolidated vehicles with new hybrid vehicles. Federal agencies that consolidate their fleets with GSA Fleet will also receive fleet management services including vehicle acquisition and disposal, maintenance control, and accident management.
However, the GSA does charge a monthly rate for the services.

Source: GSA

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Mr. Sequester, Meet Mr. Green
By ebakke on 4/27/2013 1:25:42 AM , Rating: 2
I'm very clearly talking about everyone who buys used cars.
The cars will still cost more than non-hybrids when they reach the used car market. Buyers will still have to weigh paying more up front for something that should cost less in the long term (assuming they don't sell it or crash it in the meantime).
You can't plead ignorance and pretend direct taxpayer cost is the only thing that matters.
I never claimed it was the only thing that matters. What I'm stating, is that the taxpayer cost isn't just the raw dollars collected and spent. You must include what those dollars could be doing elsewhere.

I also don't care what someone else pays or uses for their transportation needs. They might choose an automobile. They might use a bike. They might walk. They might use public transit. It doesn't matter to me. So someone else saving money on gas in 5 years when they buy a 100k mile, used Prius doesn't give me warm fuzzy feelings. And it certainly doesn't make me want to pay for it. There's no reason we (collectively) should be subsidizing one particular method of transportation.
So stop dodging the question and tell me if it makes sense for the gov't to cut corners in a long term asset it builds and later sells.
Oh get off your high horse. I'm not dodging anything - you had a poorly worded argument that didn't make sense to me.

No, I don't think it makes sense to cut corners on a long term asset the gov't builds. But in your road example privatizing them is absolutely the exception, not the rule, and they aren't built to be privatized. That's an afterthought. By and large, they're public assets and they're (at least in part) paid for by the people who use them. I greatly prefer a well built road that requires less (and therefore less costly) maintenance. But again, in that example, we're talking about something paid for by the people who use it. Not the case with this GSA plan.

"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki