backtop


Print 85 comment(s) - last by Totally.. on Apr 29 at 6:21 AM

New study shows that Apple's 13" MacBook Pro running Boot Camp is the most reliable Windows notebook

Apple vs. Microsoft, OS X vs. Windows -- these are comparisons that pit fanboys from each side against each other with little middle ground. The two sides have bickered for years with Windows fans bragging about lower prices and larger market share, while OS X backers cite high quality, reliable machines and the lack of significant malware penetration.
 
Today, however, an Israeli PC management firm has added a slight twist in the age-old Mac vs. PC debate. Between January 1st, 2013 and April 1st, 2013, Soluto monitored 150,000 notebook computers running Windows and analyzed the data from:
 
224,144 crashes
250,791 hangs
84,251 BSoDs
1,346,000 boot cycles
62,476 hours spent on boot
 
After analyzing the above data and giving each machine a "Soluto Score", the results of the study were quite surprising. The results showed that the most reliable "PC" was the 13" MacBook Pro (mid-2012 model) running Boot Camp.
 
Soluto attributes this victory to the fact that a MacBook Pro running a copy of Windows via Boot Camp is free of the typical bloatware that comes with a brand new Windows machine. To this point, Soluto opines, "PC makers should look at this data and aspire to ship PCs that perform just as well as a cleanly installed MacBook Pro."

 
To those that say that a clean install of Windows on a MacBook Pro isn't a fair comparison, Soluto offers this consolation, "One could argue that we should not compare a cleanly installed MacBook Pro with an OEM-imaged PC from Acer or Dell… But – for this first report we simply compared the real PCs in the field, some with original images and some reinstalled by their users. We believe it’s more representative of reality."
 
Rounding out the top five entries were the Acer Aspire E1-571, Dell XPS 13, Dell Vostro 3560, and the Acer Aspire V3-771. The 15” Retina MacBook Pro, three more Dells, and a single Lenovo entry fleshed out the top 10. Notebooks from ASUS, Samsung, Toshiba, and Samsung were nowhere to be found on the list.
 
ZDNET's Ed Bott reckons that the reason for the strong showings by Acer and Dell in the study is the companies’ relatively bloat-free installs, with very few third-party utilities to muck with users' computers. On the other hand, Samsung, which didn't make the list, is notorious for filling machines with needless third-party software junk.

Sources: Soluto, ZDNet



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Holy bad science, batman!
By ShieTar on 4/25/2013 3:21:19 AM , Rating: 5
This so-called "study" disqualifies itself on so many levels, its unbelievable.

First of, there is no indication on the sample numbers per unit. MacBooks are rather pricy, and the majority of users just keeps OS X on them. So could it be that the complete score for the 13" version comes from 4 or 5 laptops which just happened to not crush in the 3 months period? In order to determine a 3-digit value with statistical confidence, you need at least 30.000 samples. With an average of 3 crashes/hangs per PC, that means you need at least 10.000 Notebooks of any brand. Of course then you only have 15 brands in your 150k overall samples, and a "Top 10" makes no sense whatsoever.

Second, there is no way these machines were used under similiar conditions. Maybe the 15" MacBook has a worse score, because people did more challenging work on it, and just browsed the net on the 13" one? So maybe the browser never crashes, but self-written Assembler code does, so why blame the Notebook on that?

How is it that dailytech never mentions the horrible quality of the "studies" which they report on? Is it really asking too much that the writers on this page put some thought into their articles rather then copy+pasting this kind of pointless rubbish?




"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki