backtop


Print 41 comment(s) - last by CZroe.. on Apr 19 at 2:51 PM

It's looking to keep up with Apple and Samsung

Many people already carry a laptop, smartphone or tablet (or sometimes, all three), so what will the next must-have gadget be? Tech companies say wearable tech, and Microsoft doesn't plan on missing the boat. 

Microsoft is reportedly looking into the development of a smart watch this year. While there are no solid details on the gadget at this time, The Wall Street Journal said Microsoft has contacted Asian suppliers about it and has requested a 1.5-inch display from component makers. 

Microsoft will likely use its own hardware (much like the Surface tablet) and run the Windows 8 operating system on the smart watch. 

There's no word on a release date yet, but Microsoft might want to get an early start since Apple and Samsung are already developing smart watches of their own. Both Apple and Samsung beat Microsoft when it comes to smartphone and tablet market share, so if the Windows creator wants any chance of competing in this new tech sector, it better beat the two big boys to the punch.


Rumors of an Apple smart watch started circulating earlier this year. Apple has reportedly been talking with manufacturer Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. about the new device, and Hon Hai has been working on new technologies for wearable devices (such as more efficient displays and chips at that size).

Apple filed a patent for a "Bi-stable spring with flexible display" in 2011, which described a bi-stable spring that would be made out of thin steel and wrapped in fabric covering, then heat-sealed. The display would be located on one side of the bracelet (overlaid with an adhesive) and the logic board and battery would be placed on the other side. It also showed a universal fit, a plethora of onboard sensors, wireless charging, etc.

Apple's watch is expected to be released later this year.

As for Samsung, which is the king of Android-powered hardware products, a smart watch (which will likely run a version of Android) is expected to be released as soon as this year. No details have leaked about the product, but Samsung is looking to keep up with Apple.

While making it to the finish line first will benefit either Samsung or Apple, Samsung could also have the upper hand when it comes to pricing, since it makes its own chips and displays. Apple is notorious for having much higher-priced items.

Microsoft is hoping to be a major competitor too, though, since it was late to the tablet game. Microsoft just released its first tablet last October -- the Surface -- and the device has seen poor sales and harsh criticism of its Windows RT operating system (the version of Windows 8 for ARM-based tablets). To help the Surface with Windows 8 Pro (the full Windows 8 version), Microsoft is now marketing it as a PC while referring to the Surface with Windows RT as a tablet.

Just last week, it was reported that Microsoft plans to create a whole new batch of Surface tablets, which includes a 7-inch version

Microsoft had launched a smart watch a decade ago, but the gadget flopped.

Source: The Wall Street Journal



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: what is the prupose
By CZroe on 4/19/2013 2:51:48 PM , Rating: 2
"Because i wear different watches with different outfits."
The patents show Apple's as being a band like a slap-bracelet with a flexible display completely wrapping around your hand including sensors to tell where the band overlaps (where the displayed image will need to break/start or continue). If true, you can change the style as you see fit. Also, no one is forcing you to stop wearing other watches when you want to. I switch between a traditional watch, a Sony Ericsson MBW150 Music Edition, and an MBW-200 Executive watch. All have replaceable watch bands for whatever look I want. It dounds like you are just looking for things to hate/criticize.

"Because I can't wear watches while working out(heavy lifting)"
Then don't. No one is forcing you to wear a traditional watch while you work out/lift.

"Because carrying 2 phones, a watch, a tablet, a laptop is too many accessories."
Here's an idea: Don't carry any more than you want to. The watch helps you avoid handling a phone. Heck, it may help you manage both phones. Someone making a smart watch doesn't force you to carry a second phone, a tablet, a laptop, etc. and you choosing to carry all that doesn't mean it is any less useful to me or anyone else.

"Because going through security(everyday) is a hassle with too much crap on your body."
It's no more hassle than a traditional wristwatch.

"Because the only time it will be very useful to me(3 mile run outside) the screen will not be bright enough against the sun light"
That's an awfully stupid assumption. You have NO IDEA what display technology they will use. Casio uses the same segmented LCD display as any digital watch. My MBW150 and 200 have traditional watch faces. The tiny little monochrome OLED display is MORE visible in daylight than the segmented LCD screens on most watches. The Pebble uses an e-ink display that is BETTER in direct sunlight. I haven't used my full-color Live View enough to know how well it works in direct sunlight, but it's OLED too.

"Because you have to carry a phone for it to sync with it."
Are you seriously going there? My watch is still a watch when I turn off my phone or leave it at home. Other watches are never anything more.

The MBW150 Music Edition is my personal choice. The people who don't assume that it's just a watch actually assume that it's just a *really nice* watch. Yes, complete strangers who describe themselves as "enthusiasts" and "watch-guys" have stopped to admire and comment on my watch without ever realizing that it wasn't a traditional analog watch. I work at a gate that puts me in contact with a lot of strangers daily. My point it that it is a watch FIRST and continues functioning as one without being connected to a phone.

"Because it's not a large enough screen to read anything
Because I can just access my phone for email, music, videos, work stuff, etc... instead of squinting for a tiny watch screen
Because it's dumb to pay hundreds of dollars for redundant functions"
Sounds like you are confused about the purpose. You aren't going to browse the web on the damned thing: You are going to identify a caller and/or reject a call (same as Jabra BT8010 with caller ID). You are going to wonder what song is playing and see the artist (no different than looking at an MP3 player display). You are going to wonder what time it is and see the time/date (like a traditional watch). You are going to set a silent alarm and not wonder if you simply didn't feel the vibration in your pocket. Say what you will about redundant functions, but they have their place. Risking my phone to see the exact time 100 times a day (my work requires constant outdoor log entries) is out of the question. I don't see anyone saying that an tablet or a notebook PC is redundant because their phone has the time on it too! Next: You have no idea what prices or options will be available. It's an extremely varied market already. I paid $50 for my MBW150, $60 for the MBW200, and $25 for my Live View. Yes, the Live View is normally $50-$80 and the MBW150 was $450 in 2007, but economies of scale apply to these new products.

"This thing is like a smaller ipod touch on your wrist. Just make a squared ipod nano and sell a wrist band accessory with it."
I've actually been suggesting that they add Bluetooth and iOS connectivity with the obvious features all along... give people with your other product a reason to own it by adding complementary features. Otherwise, an iPhone or iPod Touch user has no reason to buy an iPod nano. The thing is, there is no reason for the watch to have any significant storage at all... unless it pools storage with the phone in your pocket.


"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki