Warming Evangelist Hansen Retires; Researchers Advise Panic Despite Flat Temps
April 11, 2013 7:18 AM
comment(s) - last by
Critics seize on cooling; warming theorist say models may need "readjusting"
You may have noticed it's been a rather cool North American spring. The cool trend is not an isolated incident. Overall, over the last decade temperatures have leveled off. The climate shift has critics of
anthropogenic (manmade) global warming (AGW) theory
crowing and has proponents of the
computer model-based theory
racing to readjust their predictions.
I. Critics: Global Warming has Gone AWOL
Former Californian meteorologist Anthony Watts, a top warming "skeptic", reports:
While the majority of “journalists” are still awakening from their intellectual slumber regarding climate science, the latest empirical global temperature measurements (RSS atmosphere temps and CO2 chart on the left) confirm... global warming has gone AWOL and a slight cooling trend has developed over the last 10 years (a minus 0.42 degrees by 2100 if the trend persists).
This warming hiatus happened despite the loud and hysterical shrieking by the climate scientists on the public dole that current CO2 emissions would cause rapid, unequivocal, irrefutable accelerated warming.
[Image Source: Free Republic]
And Marc Morano of
adds in a
The idea that CO2 is the tail that wags the dog is no longer scientifically tenable. In the peer-reviewed literature we're finding hundreds of factors influence global temperature, everything from ocean cycles to the tilt of the earth's axis to water vapor, methane, cloud feedback, volcanic dust, all of these factors are coming together. They're now realizing it wasn't the simple story we've been told of your SUV is creating a dangerously warm planet.
In the peer-reviewed literature, they've tried to explain away this lull. In the proceedings of the National Academy of Science a year or two ago they had a study blaming Chinese coal use for the lack of global warming. So, in an ironic twist, global warming proponents are now claiming that that coal use is saving us from dangerous global warming.
Even more mainstream publications are joining in.
It may be that the climate is responding to higher concentrations of carbon dioxide in ways that had not been properly understood before. This possibility, if true, could have profound significance both for climate science and for environmental and social policy.
A March Gallup
showed that today 58 percent of Americans remain worried about warming, up slightly from the 51 percent in 2011. But that's down from the 62-72 percent response levels seen between 1999 and 2001, an era rife with strongly worded predictions of global catastrophe.
The same study also showed an increasing number of Americans believe the media is exaggerating warming impact.
II. AGW Advocates Fight Back
Meanwhile, climate researchers who spent millions in government grant money to author studies on warming -- many of which predicted doomsday scenarios -- are back to the drawing board,
refusing to admit defeat
One key global warming "evangelist"
from his post as head of the
Goddard Institute for Space Studies
in New York City, a top N
ational Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA) research center, in April 2013. Now working as an adjunct professor at
, the climatologist earlier this year he
acknowledged warming had flatlined
, "The 5-year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade."
AGW evangelist James Hansen, shown here arrested during a protest, retired this month.
[Image Source: Tar Sands Action]
But in the same "
" [PDF] he argued that the public shouldn't just look at the numbers, but look at more nebulous and abstract observations, which he sees as supporting his beliefs of runaway warming. He
, "The observant person who is willing to look at the past over several seasons and several years, should notice that the frequency of unusual warm anomalies has increased and the extreme anomalies."
Such hopeful sentiments are echoed by other AGW advocates.
, the senior director for strategic planning at the
Environmental Defense Fund
and a former assistant secretary at the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
, seeming suggests that the body of climatologists supporting AGW theory is alone enough to prove global warming in the absence of other evidence.
He comments to
This is a highly complex calculation to make in the first place. The short period of time, only 10 years in which the increasing temperature has leveled, really doesn't tell us very much other than the fact that temperatures may still be rising but just not as fast as they were before. What's compelling about the climate science is that we have literally thousands of the world's leading scientists around the country pretty much saying the same thing about where we're headed, and it's not reassuring.
Actice researchers are attempting to develop new models, explaining why the Earth cooled, even as greenhouse gas levels continued to rise. A November 2012 study [abstract]
in climatology's top journal,
Nature Climate Change
, suggests that the ocean absorbed more heat than expected, dampening warming effects.
A recent study suggests oceanic dampening has slowed warming.
[Image Source: Deposit Photos]
Geophysical Research Letters
suggests that surface station data may have skewed warming predictions high. While it predicts ongoing warming with rising greenhouse gas levels, it showed that other forms of compiled data predicted a slower, milder warming trend.
The big question is whether
climate figures like Al Gore
, who literally became billionaires on the back of policies like "carbon credits", can sustain the push for
massive spending to "fight" warming
. Such approaches have yet to approve effective in halting global CO2 output; yet that hasn't stopped AGW advocates from suggesting everything from
bans on meat
to spending over
to combat warming in recent years.
Watts Up With That
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: "Researchers Advise Panic Despite Flat Temps"
4/17/2013 12:03:09 PM
LOL "slight cooling trend"? Where? This article is just more cherry-picking nonsense. Why is 10 years the magical cutoff?
Recall that in 2008, skeptics did the same thing, saying that the planet was cooling for the last 10 years. There was a dip in 2008 temperatures that was explained by the temporarily low ENSO index, and it happened to be 10 years after the temporary 1998 peak. Voila, downwards slope.
I didn't see any 10-year trend arguments on DT in 2010 or 2011, because that would have been a strong upwards trendline. Inconvenient, huh.
Most of these fluctuations have already been accounted for:
That trendline is still holding strong, and several of those datasets are from satellites. You're fooling yourself if you think warming has flattened, slowed down, whatever. Skeptics have been repeatedly wrong when they say, "okay, now it's staying flat", each time adjusting upward the new flat level.
Your other claims are BS. The IPCC has never made any concrete claims about runaway, instead using
feedback systems in all its models and projections, so don't create a strawman about that. There has never been one-sided arguents about cold/hot spells or jets streams or ocean currents or whatever. It's always been part of variability.
You know what's funny?
I don't even believe in combating AGW.
The benefits are tiny compared to the cost, and it's a losing battle against developing countries who are growing and yet still use a fraction of the CO2 per capita than the west. It would be a crime to either slow them down or make them waste money on solar/wind instead of addressing hunger/disease/infrastructure.
Still, I'm not going to perpetuate a falsehood due to that belief.
“Then they pop up and say ‘Hello, surprise! Give us your money or we will shut you down!' Screw them. Seriously, screw them. You can quote me on that.” -- Newegg Chief Legal Officer Lee Cheng referencing patent trolls
Top Climate Official: Don't be Confused by Flat-lining Temperatures, Warming is Worse
January 16, 2013, 5:22 PM
New Paper Estimates 74 Percent of Warming is Manmade
December 26, 2011, 12:22 PM
Study Finds "Huge Discrepancy" Between Hard Data and Warming Models
July 29, 2011, 12:53 AM
Al Gore Lashes Out at Obama, Saying He "Failed" to Fight Warming
June 23, 2011, 12:19 AM
Leading Climate Change Skeptic Recants, Wants $100B to Fight Warming
August 31, 2010, 2:44 PM
Quick Note: Drone Loses Fight to the Death With Kangaroo
December 23, 2014, 3:28 PM
Campbell's Monkeys Found to Use Different Dialects to Describe Local Threats
December 22, 2014, 3:52 PM
Scientist Confirm Men are More Likely to Die in "Idiotic" Ways
December 17, 2014, 1:07 PM
Shoppers Surprised to Find Cards Against Humanity's Bullsh*t is Real Feces
December 16, 2014, 11:14 PM
Air Force Worries Hot Fuel Could Harm F-35, "Proactively" Paints Trucks Shiny
December 11, 2014, 9:06 AM
McDonald's is Testing Tablet-Based Burger Customization at 30 Franchises
December 10, 2014, 11:30 AM
Most Popular Articles
Miyamoto: Nintendo is Prepping Successor to Troubled Wii U
December 22, 2014, 6:28 PM
Amazon's Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 Drops to $299 (30 Percent Off) for a Day
December 22, 2014, 10:57 AM
Airbus A350 XWB Passenger Jet Takes Off, First Unit Delivered to Qatar Airlines
December 22, 2014, 1:22 PM
Microsoft, Google Back The Interview, North Korea Vows Attacks on America
December 24, 2014, 4:25 PM
Nokia's Sweet $250 Android Lollipop N1 Tablet is Rumored for Jan. 7 China Launch
December 24, 2014, 1:45 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information