Print 48 comment(s) - last by shabby.. on Apr 9 at 10:01 PM

Western state sets a controversial driver distraction precedent

In the land of electric vehicles and honey, aka the nation's most populous state, California, controversy is brewing over distracted driving.

The Appellate Division Superior Court for the County of Fresno, Calif. made a controversial driver distraction ruling [PDF] this week, when it stiffened its ban on in-car smartphone use, banning motorists from looking at maps on their mobile devices while driving.

California, like most states allows motorists to consult paper-maps while driving -- a distraction that's considered dangerous, but at times necessary to motorists.  However, the exact same act on the a mobile device -- which arguably take less finger dexterity -- is verboten.

Distracted driving
This is okay, but using your smartphone is not. [Image Source: Petersen's 4 Wheel]

To be fair, the presiding Judge F. Brian Alvarez acknowledges that this cognitive dissonance between non-digital and digital uses exists in his ruling.  However, he says that the 2008 law passed by California's state legislature and the follow-up 2012 hands-free bill are explicit -- no manual interaction with digital devices of any kind can be performed while driving.

He suggests that the Californian legislature review the issue and possibly modify the law.

p. 1
p. 2
p. 3

The decision isn't entirely catastrophic to motorists; barring reversal from the legislature, the ruling still leaves drivers with some legal options.  Drivers can use hands free smartphone navigation software (which many phones now come with), although interacting with the device other than by voice is strictly illegal.  California also allows automated self-driving cars, although they are not yet widely commercially available.

And of course there's one other option for California's motorists -- a good old-fashioned map.

Source: The Appelate Division Superior Court for the County of Fresno, Calif.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By BRB29 on 4/8/2013 1:30:47 PM , Rating: 2
This is stupid and good luck proving I interacted with my map while driving.

You figure they would rather have someone tapping the screen a few times to to choose/change route rather than having a huge piece of paper slapping you in the face.

RE: Sooo....
By lagomorpha on 4/8/2013 2:28:12 PM , Rating: 3
Possible explanation: Generation gap. Even though GPS devices have been available a number of years, a lot of law makers are of a generation that would have never come across the newfangled contraptions. Personally I'm under 30 and a bit confused about this technology that they kept legal. A (I think I'm spelling this correctly) map? What sort of hardware does it run on?

RE: Sooo....
By inighthawki on 4/8/2013 4:19:18 PM , Rating: 2
While I know a lot of people who try to fiddle with phones, GPSs, etc while driving, I've never met a single person who has tried to read a map while doing so.

While it's silly that it is considered legal to do so, it's simply not done in practice these days.

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki