Fisker Automotive Lays Off 75 Percent of Staff, Catches a Federal Lawsuit
April 8, 2013 12:17 PM
comment(s) - last by
The lawsuit accuses Fisker of not giving employees 60 days notice before the mass layoffs
Fisker Automotive has been on the lookout for a buyer in order to stay afloat, but the automaker is running out of both time and options -- resulting in
major employee layoffs
Fisker announced Friday that it had laid off 75 percent of its staff, which equates to about 160 employees.
The automaker didn't provide any severance payments or formally alert California about the layoffs. It did, however, pay employees for unused vacation time.
"Our efforts to secure a strategic alliance or partnership are continuing in earnest, but unfortunately we have reached a point where a significant reduction in our workforce has become necessary," Fisker Automotive said in a statement.
"We expect that at the end of the day we will have retained approximately 25 percent of our workforce. The company regrets having to terminate any of its hardworking and talented people. But this was a necessary strategic step in our efforts to maximize the value of Fisker's core assets."
As if this wasn't bad enough, Fisker is now facing a federal lawsuit that accuses the company of not giving employees advanced notice of the mass layoffs. Under the U.S. Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, workers are supposed to have 60 days notice before being laid off.
Fisker could have to pay the employees the wages they would've earned in that 60-day period.
The lawsuit was filed Friday in the U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, California.
placed its U.S. workers on furlough
a couple of weeks ago to try and keep costs down while it searches for an investor. This means that the U.S. workforce had a temporary, unpaid leave until the company got back on its feet.
In April 2010, Fisker received $529 million in
, which were part of a program to progress development of high-tech vehicles. The loans were also meant to revamp a closed General Motors plant in Wilmington, Delaware for Fisker EV production. However, Fisker fell a little behind on its production schedule, and in May 2011,
DOE froze the loans due to "unmet milestones."
Fisker had only drawn $193 million of it at that point.
Due to these money issues, Fisker is having a hard time securing funds to make its second car -- the Fisker Atlantic. Fisker is now looking for investors to help out with the financial situation so Atlantic production can begin.
Fisker's investor solution has drawn a lot of criticism though, because two potentials have been Chinese companies -- Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and Dongfeng Motor Group Co. This is seen as an issue because Fisker received U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund its Karma plug-in.
The Karma itself has had to be recalled in the past too, as battery supplier A123 Systems (which
last year and was later
acquired by Chinese firm
Wanxiang Group for about $260 million) vowed to replace nearly 600 Karma batteries for $55 million in 2012.
Last month, Fisker's things started getting worse for Fisker when Henrik Fisker, who co-founded Fisker Automotive in 2007,
stepped down as executive chairman
citing "several major disagreements" with "Fisker Automotive executive management on the business strategy."
Fisker Automotive is expected to make a loan payment to the DOE on April 22.
The Detroit News
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
4/8/2013 3:53:19 PM
You only have to look at the Volt to know that it isn't true that a cheaper electric car will be affordable. The Volt is still $35,000 even with the subsidies. Course you're still paying a payment of far more than a $35,000 car would imply. Sure removing the engine would lower its cost but would make the range only 40-50 miles. So you need to double the battery size at least which would probably cost more than removing the engine would save. You might get the subsidized cost down to $30,000. But even that is too much for a compact car for most people. And you're still talking over a decade to pay off the difference between that and a Cruze.
"And boy have we patented it!" -- Steve Jobs, Macworld 2007
Fisker Automotive Forced to Put U.S. Employees on Furlough
March 28, 2013, 12:16 PM
Fisker Automotive's Executive Chairman Resigns
March 13, 2013, 5:25 PM
Battery Maker A123 Systems Acquired by Chinese Firm for $260M
December 10, 2012, 8:10 AM
House Committee Looks into Terms of DOE's Fisker Automotive Loans
October 23, 2012, 2:50 PM
Official: A123 Systems Files for Bankruptcy
October 16, 2012, 4:44 PM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Uber - Everyone's Autonomous Car Driver?
August 20, 2016, 6:01 AM
Volkswagens Vulnerable to Hacking Attacks
August 14, 2016, 1:08 PM
2017 Porsche Panamera: I’ll Take Three of These.
July 24, 2016, 6:44 PM
Ford, Toyota, and Universal Pictures Celebrate "Back to the Future Day' in Style
October 21, 2015, 4:19 PM
Consumer Reports Flexes Muscle, Hits Slumping Tesla Motors Stock
October 20, 2015, 4:13 PM
Most Popular Articles
Are you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Are farm children less likely to have allergies and asthma in adulthood?
Sep 30, 2016, 5:00 AM
MH 17 shot down by missile 'brought from Russia' into Ukraine's rebel territory
Sep 29, 2016, 5:00 PM
Burlington Gun Attack
Sep 27, 2016, 5:00 AM
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information