Print 27 comment(s) - last by maugrimtr.. on Apr 10 at 11:29 AM

The lawsuit accuses Fisker of not giving employees 60 days notice before the mass layoffs

Fisker Automotive has been on the lookout for a buyer in order to stay afloat, but the automaker is running out of both time and options -- resulting in major employee layoffs.

Fisker announced Friday that it had laid off 75 percent of its staff, which equates to about 160 employees. 

The automaker didn't provide any severance payments or formally alert California about the layoffs. It did, however, pay employees for unused vacation time.

"Our efforts to secure a strategic alliance or partnership are continuing in earnest, but unfortunately we have reached a point where a significant reduction in our workforce has become necessary," Fisker Automotive said in a statement.

"We expect that at the end of the day we will have retained approximately 25 percent of our workforce. The company regrets having to terminate any of its hardworking and talented people. But this was a necessary strategic step in our efforts to maximize the value of Fisker's core assets."

As if this wasn't bad enough, Fisker is now facing a federal lawsuit that accuses the company of not giving employees advanced notice of the mass layoffs. Under the U.S. Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, workers are supposed to have 60 days notice before being laid off. 

Fisker could have to pay the employees the wages they would've earned in that 60-day period. 

The lawsuit was filed Friday in the U.S. District Court in Santa Ana, California. 

Fisker had placed its U.S. workers on furlough a couple of weeks ago to try and keep costs down while it searches for an investor. This means that the U.S. workforce had a temporary, unpaid leave until the company got back on its feet. 

In April 2010, Fisker received $529 million in DOE loans, which were part of a program to progress development of high-tech vehicles. The loans were also meant to revamp a closed General Motors plant in Wilmington, Delaware for Fisker EV production. However, Fisker fell a little behind on its production schedule, and in May 2011, DOE froze the loans due to "unmet milestones." Fisker had only drawn $193 million of it at that point. 
Due to these money issues, Fisker is having a hard time securing funds to make its second car -- the Fisker Atlantic. Fisker is now looking for investors to help out with the financial situation so Atlantic production can begin. 

Fisker's investor solution has drawn a lot of criticism though, because two potentials have been Chinese companies -- Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and Dongfeng Motor Group Co. This is seen as an issue because Fisker received U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund its Karma plug-in. 

The Karma itself has had to be recalled in the past too, as battery supplier A123 Systems (which went bankrupt last year and was later acquired by Chinese firm Wanxiang Group for about $260 million) vowed to replace nearly 600 Karma batteries for $55 million in 2012. 
Last month, Fisker's things started getting worse for Fisker when Henrik Fisker, who co-founded Fisker Automotive in 2007, stepped down as executive chairman citing "several major disagreements" with "Fisker Automotive executive management on the business strategy."

Fisker Automotive is expected to make a loan payment to the DOE on April 22.

Source: The Detroit News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Nuclear industry
By johnsmith9875 on 4/8/2013 2:06:10 PM , Rating: -1
We give 30 billion in free money per year to the nuclear industry and all we've gotten is accidents, dead fish from the hot water dumping, pollution, radioactive steam releases, and lots of low and high level radioactive waste the government has to pay for to store and eventually dispose of, if ever.
This fisker issue is a speedbump in comparison when it comes to government waste.

RE: Nuclear industry
By CZroe on 4/8/2013 2:39:53 PM , Rating: 2
You really think that's all we've gotten? How about the electricity?

RE: Nuclear industry
By BRB29 on 4/8/2013 2:40:55 PM , Rating: 2
What? your numbers are way off buddy.
Here's a link, it will enlighten you.

Nuclear energy is by far the cleanest, cheapest, and produced the least waste.

RE: Nuclear industry
By sorry dog on 4/8/2013 7:47:57 PM , Rating: 2
Nuclear energy is by far the cleanest, cheapest, and produced the least waste.

No sir, not cheapest. Your links are for operating costs, but when you include permitting, financing, and construction costs, nuclear cost is blown out of the water by coal and gas.

Don't get me wrong, I'm very pro-nuclear as I think if we had it on a bigger scale these massive up front costs would be less and make it look more competitive, but that just ain't the story today.

RE: Nuclear industry
By wookie1 on 4/8/2013 2:47:10 PM , Rating: 2
I agree that we shouldn't be giving taxpayer money to support the nuclear industry, but you don't think that cheap electricity (even after factoring out the subsidies) is a benefit?

RE: Nuclear industry
By FITCamaro on 4/8/2013 2:51:46 PM , Rating: 2
Your supposed number is far off from what I see. From what I see, much of it is imagined as well as "if this happened, this is what the government would be liable for". And furthermore, the government only has itself to blame for most of it. If not for tree huggers and fear mongers like yourself, we'd be recycling our nuclear waste back into fuel and likely not even running the reactors that produce said waste anymore to begin with. Nuclear is the only clean, stable power source we have right now. And we are stupid for not pursuing it more. Instead we waste money on wind and solar which require us to have backup power plants available for when the wind isn't blowing and the sun isn't shining.

"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki