backtop


Print 35 comment(s) - last by CZroe.. on Apr 8 at 2:42 PM

The petroleum industry opposes the EPA's sulfur reduction plans

Typically when we we're talking about the Environmental Protection Agency and gasoline, we're talking about the EPA's push to increase the amount of ethanol in gasoline used around the country or its efforts to increase fuel efficiency. However, the ethanol mandate isn't the only fuel agenda that the EPA is pursuing. The EPA is now proposing rules for cleaner gasoline that would go into effect by 2017.

This time around, automotive manufacturers are backing the new clean gasoline rules. The EPA has reportedly been working on the new rules for over 18 months and the rules would eventually require a two-thirds reduction of sulfur in gasoline by 2017.

According to the EPA, that sort of reduction in sulfur content in gasoline would be the equivalent of removing 33 million cars from the highways around the country. Automotive manufacturers also say that reducing the level sulfur in gasoline will improve vehicle performance.

Automaker associations supporting the new rules said in a meeting concerning the proposed regulations, "Reducing sulfur yields immediate and future public benefits. Ultra-low sulfur gasoline is already available; costs to implement nationwide are overstated."

Sulfur byproducts in gasoline reduce the effectiveness of catalytic converters and increase tailpipe emissions according automakers. The rules would also boost the durability of catalytic converters.
 
Refineries are already producing ultra-low sulfur fuel for use in California, the European Union, and Japan.

Predictably, the oil industry is opposing the proposed rules. Industry officials say that these changes would require capital investments of between $10 billion and $17 billion and would result in recurring annual costs of between $5 billion and $13 billion. The net effect according to the petroleum industry would be an increase in the cost of fuel per gallon of between $.12 and $.25.

Source: Detroit News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

12 cents?
By CaedenV on 3/29/2013 11:27:45 AM , Rating: 1
In the last year the cost of gas has fluctuated more than $1 from the lowest to highest point. I don't think anyone is going to notice if you tack 12 cents in there.

There are ~300 Million cars in the US, and (according to wiki answers) roughly 1/5th of them are actuially in use (the rest are in scrap yards, storage, or are otherwise not used or rarely used), which comes to ~62 Million cars on the road. The effect of removing 33 million cars out of 62 million is a pretty astounding number!

roughly +3.5% in the cost of gas in order to effectively remove the pollution of more than 50% of the cars on the road? While getting better gas efficiency and/or more power? Seems like a no-brainer to me. One would think that the greater efficiency would pay for most of (if not all of) the extra 3.5% in the price hike.

... not every day that I actually agree with something that the EPA says. Something must be wrong with the universe.
... If only we could remove 50% of drivers




RE: 12 cents?
By Spuke on 3/29/13, Rating: 0
RE: 12 cents?
By Dorkyman on 3/29/2013 1:33:08 PM , Rating: 2
Another article stated that refiners have already over the years taken out 90% of the sulfur. To take out a small percentage more will cost just as much as it did to get to the 90% level.

I trust NOTHING the EPA says, since to them this stuff is religion and thus not subject to logic and analysis. Keep in mind that Messiah Himself is riding on the EPA's back. He has stated numerous times that since he can't get what he wants through new legislation he will steer the EPA to deliver essentially the same goods. So logic is out the window as long as this president is in office.


RE: 12 cents?
By Spuke on 3/29/2013 2:21:31 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
Another article stated that refiners have already over the years taken out 90% of the sulfur. To take out a small percentage more will cost just as much as it did to get to the 90% level.
Didn't know this. They ALWAYS make it sound like nothing is being done unless it's mandated. Assholes.


RE: 12 cents?
By Mint on 3/31/2013 11:10:47 AM , Rating: 1
LOL you think they lowered sulphur content out of the goodness of their heart?

Sulphur regulations have put lower limits all over the world. Canada first had a 500ppm limit, then 15ppm. Europe is mostly 10-15ppm. The US is 50-80ppm.

And while Reclaimer will whine about the EPA making diesel more expensive due to emission standards, diesels in Europe also can't handle the higher sulfur content of US diesel because there is a lack of strong mandate. That's why they're on the side of the EPA here, as mentioned in the article.

Why would the free market have any incentive to reduce sulphur content by itself? You think consumers are going to bring their car's gas to the lab and get it tested and keep checking up for the various stations they frequent?


RE: 12 cents?
By Mint on 3/31/13, Rating: 0
RE: 12 cents?
By piroroadkill on 3/31/2013 11:10:01 AM , Rating: 2
It's too cheap in the US anyway..


RE: 12 cents?
By CZroe on 3/29/2013 2:16:41 PM , Rating: 2
No one will notice? You must not drive.


RE: 12 cents?
By CaedenV on 3/29/2013 3:40:17 PM , Rating: 2
How does $500/mo in gas do ya? Yes I drive, but in a world where gas fluctuates from $2.85 to $3.90 over the course of a year I don't think I would notice if the price goes up or down $0.12 very much.


RE: 12 cents?
By inighthawki on 3/29/2013 5:03:33 PM , Rating: 2
I've seen the price in gas fluctuate by 2-3x that much in a months time. 12 cents is nothing.


RE: 12 cents?
By RU482 on 3/30/2013 6:30:57 PM , Rating: 2
yeah, it tends to increase/(rarely)descrease in $0.10 increments here


RE: 12 cents?
By CZroe on 4/8/2013 2:42:26 PM , Rating: 2
And people "notice" every time. Gas prices are daily news.


RE: 12 cents?
By Reclaimer77 on 3/29/2013 5:09:02 PM , Rating: 3
Gullible mofo's like are why we have the Government we do today. No offense, but yeah, you're sponge-headed.

"Hey sounds good to me, just do whatever you want to us, I'll go along with it..."


RE: 12 cents?
By ammaross on 3/29/2013 7:34:23 PM , Rating: 2
Your diner napkin math doesn't take into account that the gov't is likely taking active vehicle registrations as their "total car count," not some gut-sourced number of cars actually in use. (And come on, this is the gov't. You think they'd toss out a bunch of cars from their statistics just because they're "rarely used"?)


"I'm an Internet expert too. It's all right to wire the industrial zone only, but there are many problems if other regions of the North are wired." -- North Korean Supreme Commander Kim Jong-il

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki