Science Says Oil Waste Caused Record OK Quake, Paid-Off Politicians Say Otherwise
March 28, 2013 2:42 PM
comment(s) - last by
National study suggests that 5.7-magnitude quake was caused by wastewater injection (manmade)
A report by a team of prestigious scientific experts has rebuked an Oklahoma state-sponsored report claiming that wastewater injection over the last few decades had nothing to do with a record-setting earthquake centered in Prague, Oklahoma.
I. Paid-Off State Officials: Injection is Harmless
Fracking and pressurized injections of wastewater from traditional wells in Oklahoma's Wilzetta oil fields began in the 1990s. The controversial resource extraction technique involves injecting pressurized sand, water, and chemicals into shale formations, triggering the release of oil and natural gas that otherwise would be hard to extract.
Energy giants like Chesapeake Energy Corp. (
), OGE Energy Corp. (
) Exxon Mobil Corp. (
), NextEra Energy, Inc. (
), and Devon Energy Corp. (
) have made billions in revenue from the process. However, critics -- including some prominent scientists -- have criticized the process, claiming it creates seismic instability and may contaminate local water supplies. Those claims seemed prophetic when Oklahoma, a top fracking/wastewater injection state, was hit with a rash of uncharacteristic earthquakes which culminated in a magnitude 5.7 earthquake in 2011 which destroyed 14 homes.
Still, Oklahoma politicians and state-appointed scientists have defended the process. In a 2011 report entitled "
Response to Attacks on Hydraulic Fracturing
Oklahoma Corporation Commission
Oklahoma Geological Survey
(OGS) defend the process of fracking/wastewater injection.
And in a separate study, dubbed the "
OGS Prague Statement
" [PDF], they directly address claims that pressurized injections into sealed wells caused the quake, suggesting instead that it was caused by a segment of the Wilzetta Fault which was "favorably orientated for earthquakes." They cite other studies suggesting that such "swarms" of earthquakes are often naturally occurring along fault lines.
II. Following the Monetary Stench
But state politicians who appoint the OGS scientists and OCC officials may have a bit of a vested interest. Chesapeake Energy, OGE Energy, Devon Energy, and others have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to roll both state and federal Republicans in Oklahoma into office.
Thanks in part to their deep pockets, Republicans own a healthy majority in Oklahoma's legislature. And the oil industry's "hired help" appears eager to repay the favor.
U.S. Rep. James Lankford
received $24,300 USD from Devon Energy, $22,250 USD from OGE Energy, and an additional $113,800 from other oil and natural gas extraction companies, according to OpenSecrets.
Sen. James M. Inhofe
received a whopping $537,750 USD from oil and natural gas firms.
Here's the contact info for those gentlemen:
U.S. Rep. James Lankford:
Local Phone 405-234-9900 / D.C. Phone 202-225-2132
U.S. Sen James M. Inhofe
Local Phone 405-608-4381 / D.C. Phone (202) 224-4721
Here's a summary of the special interest payouts to the top state-level politicians from the Republican majority:
(Click to enlarge)
Notice that every major leader in the state house and senate was paid off by the
Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Assoc.
(OIPA)-- a pro-oil industry group -- and every politician also received healthy contributions from several other oil and natural gas firms. (Source: VoteSmart.org)
Here's the contact info for those gentlemen:
Sen. Brian Bingman (R, president pro tempore)
Local phone (405) 521-5528 / State capital phone (918) 227-1856
Sen. Mike Schulz (R, majority floor leader)
Local phone (405) 521-5612 / State capital phone N/A
Rep. T.W. Shannon (R, speaker of the house)
Local phone (405) 557-7374 / Asst. Phone (405) 557-7374
Rep. Mike Jackson (R, speaker pro tempore)
Local phone (405) 557-7317/ Asst. Phone (405) 557-7317
The OIPA's mission statement basically acknowledges that its mission is to pay off polticians, writing:
The OIPA is committed to promoting the interests and welfare of independent oil and gas operators, working interest owners, royalty owners, and those businesses who provide services for the energy industry.
Specifically, the association strives to provide its members with outstanding legislative and regulatory representation.
In a recent post it
, "Since President Obama’s election to office in 2008, the nation’s oil and natural gas producers have faced constant scrutiny from the federal regulatory agencies under White House control."
III. Unbiased Research Contradicts Oil-Industry Funded Findings
So the oil companies paid the politicians, and the politicians hired scientists and appointed officials who were willing to claim fracking/wastewater injection is safe. But what do unbiased national scientists say?
The answer came in a peer-reviewed study
[abstract] in the journal
, which rebukes the biased reports from state-sponsored researchers. The new article entitled "Potentially induced earthquakes in Oklahoma, USA: Links between wastewater injection and the 2011 Mw 5.7 earthquake sequence' was written by
Prof. Katie M. Keranen
Univ. of Oklahoma
Prof. Heather M. Savage
Geoffrey A. Abers
, and Dr. Elizabeth S. Cochran of the
US Geological Survey
We use the aftershocks to illuminate the faults that ruptured in the sequence, and show that the tip of the initial rupture plane is within ∼200 m of active injection wells and within ∼1 km of the surface; 30% of early aftershocks occur within the sedimentary section. Subsurface data indicate that fluid was injected into effectively sealed compartments, and we interpret that a net fluid volume increase after 18 yr of injection lowered effective stress on reservoir-bounding faults. Significantly, this case indicates that decades-long lags between the commencement of fluid injection and the onset of induced earthquakes are possible, and modifies our common criteria for fluid-induced events. The progressive rupture of three fault planes in this sequence suggests that stress changes from the initial rupture triggered the successive earthquakes, including one larger than the first.
In other words, it traces the earthquakes to sealed well sites near their epicenter, which were injected with toxic pressurized wastewater from the oil extraction process.
The study finds that wastewater injection-- injecting pressurized liquid to extract deep oil/natural gas deposits -- destabilizes local sediments and likely caused seismic activity.
Note, that while the study does not directly implicate fracking (which involves fluid injection as well), it does raise concerns about the the process, as it implicates similar wastewater injections in creating seismic activity.
The authors determined that the volume of the sealed wells changed over time, causing stress that appears to have triggered at least two quakes of magnitude of 5.0, and then the biggest quake -- a magnitude of 5.7. These quakes were felt in 17 states.
Fluid injection in the wastewater wells began after 1993, according to the current paper and the authors suggest the risk could have been adverted if the well owners had followed the criteria for injection established by Davis and Frohlich (1993), which suggests locating injection wells away from seismic faults.
The findings correspond to a previous 2011
[PDF] by the
US National Research Council
(NRC), which showed that fracking caused smaller quakes (although failing to definitively show whether or not it caused larger quakes). A 2012 USGS report
also links fracking to earthquakes
Note that the difference between fracking injection and wastewater injection is that fracking typically injects the pressurized fluid deeper under the ground, so more research is needed to determine just how much commonality in seismic risk there is between the two practices.
IV. Lawsuits, Legal Challenges to Future Fracking Loom
The study raises serious questions.
First, given the blatant payouts to state politicians by oil and gas interests, it seems pretty interesting that an unbiased team of experts would come to the conclusion that wastewater injection
cause the earthquakes, while a team of state-sponsored researchers whose pay is dependent on politicians paid by special interests would claim that it
Aside from questions of scientific integrity regarding the researchers at the OGS/OCC, the report also raises questions of liability. If the quakes were indeed directly correlated to the wastewater injection processes and the causative mechanism was properly determined in the new report, then homeowners or business owners whose properties were damaged could (in theory) sue NextEra Energy, Chesapeake Energy, Exxon Mobil, Devon Energy, OGE Energy,
Fracking projects are being considered in a number of states.
[Image Source: U.S. Energy Information Agency]
Of course don't be surprised if state politicians try to author some sort of legislation to exempt their energy industry "sponsors" from such litigation, given that they already appear to have tried to cover up the damage done.
The report is also of keen interest as various other states, such as Illinois and Pennsylvania are considering new fracking or wastewater injection projects or expanding existing ones. Overseas in England, fracking/wastewater injection is also a major topic of debate, where special interests are similarly trying to sway the discussion.
The new study is critical as it's the most definitive, clear, and detailed document to date indicating that fluid injection can cause seismic activity. Citizens in states with fracking or wastewater injection projects should consider this carefully.
If earthquakes occur, consider suing your local oil and gas companies for damages -- science supports you. And in the meantime look into (on VoteSmart or other sources), which of your local politicians are taking money from big oil and gas companies -- the results may surprise and disturb you.
In all though, this shouldn't be terribly surprising -- a recent
University of Kansas
School of Business
[PDF] revealed that for $1 given to a federal politician as a business, you get $243 USD in kickbacks -- either indirectly (via lesser taxation) or directly siphoned off citizens taxes.
An earlier version of the story erroneously refered to the wastewater as being from fracking, where as the wastewater that researchers suggest caused the quakes was, in fact, from traditional drilling. Several other publications -- including a
on the topic make similar errors or offer somewhat ambiguous statements -- and remain uncorrected.
Nonetheless, the issue of cash payments to state legislators to allow injection/fracking remains, as does the issues surrounding special-interest endorsed research that suggested the quakes to have occurred naturally (when they appear to be energy-industry/wastewater caused).
Opensecrets [campaign funding info]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Where to begin?
3/28/2013 11:01:06 PM
Is this a news site or a conspiracy site? This article is seriously looney.
1) Bringing up fracking almost exclusively when the story has zero to do with fracking... ???
2) Saying that politicians did whatever you think they shouldn't have done because of some arbitrary campaign contribution that were made... Contributions come in from people on every side of every issue. It's one of the pinnacles of sloppy journalism to start making wild inferences regarding cherry-picked campaign contributions.
You mean, someone who contributed to a politician has a *gasp* opinion on an issue?? Oh no! Oh god save us! How could this be?! Did you notice how much they raised? That's a rounding error compared to the total.
Frankly, I would be shocked if the mix of the corporate campaign donors wasn't representative of the types of companies that have the largest presence in that particular district. How could it possibly be otherwise? Where else did you expect corporate contributions to come from?
3) Saying that OK votes Republican because of money spent on campaigns... Really? Are you kidding? Yes, I'm sure they are all secretly raging communists who can't express themselves at the polls do to that evil, evil money that's involved somewhere.. in some way.. with something.
4) As noted elsewhere, OK has a lot of wells. A lot. A quake starting somewhere in the vicinity of a well isn't that shocking. That doesn't prove or disprove anything, but it's something to keep in mind.
5) While it's true that the discussed procedure could potentially change the makeup of stresses and pressures in the area around the well, the issue needs much more study than a single quake event.
6) Even if there truly is a link between wastewater injection and earthquakes, it can only accomplish this by releasing energy at fault lines that has already been built up by natural geological processes. In other words, it can't "create" quakes but it can trigger them early. That's a really good thing. The ability to intentionally release fault stresses in the form of mild quakes instead of waiting for a major disaster to strike could save countless lives and structures. Imagine a future where we take an active role in managing the stress levels at fault lines near major population centers around the world. Either way, I can't see a down side to the procedure.
"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)
Report: Earthquakes Across the Middle of the U.S. Likely Due to By-products of "Fracking"
April 13, 2012, 11:46 AM
NASA Considering SpaceX "Red Dragon" for Returning Mars Samples to Earth
March 10, 2014, 2:43 PM
Court Rules that FAA Cannot Ban Commercial Drones, Dismisses $10,000 Fine for Drone User
March 7, 2014, 1:14 PM
Lt. Gen. Davis Says Next Gen USAF Bomber Will "Of Course" Surpass $550M/Unit
March 6, 2014, 9:45 AM
USAF Moves Forward With Long Range Bomber Program Despite Budget Crunch
March 4, 2014, 9:44 AM
Drone Ships May Replace Manned Standard Cargo Ships in the Future
February 27, 2014, 7:48 AM
Military Officer in Charge of Lockheed F-35 Program: We Won't Pay for "Mistake after Mistake"
February 19, 2014, 11:07 AM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
Tesla Motors Calls New Jersey Out on New Rule Against Its Direct Sales Model
March 11, 2014, 12:01 PM
NASA Considering SpaceX "Red Dragon" for Returning Mars Samples to Earth
March 10, 2014, 2:43 PM
India Could Rock Google With Its Biggest Antitrust Fine Yet -- $5B USD
March 10, 2014, 8:12 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information