backtop


Print 13 comment(s) - last by danjw1.. on Mar 26 at 1:13 PM

However, cell phones would still be left off the list of usable devices during these times on a flight

As mobile gadgets become increasingly ubiquitous with new versions released at a rapid pace, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is realizing that it may have to ease back on its rules concerning the use of readers/tablets during takeoff and landing. 

By the end of this year, an industry working group set up by the FAA may announce that the use of devices like Kindle e-readers and iPads can be used during takeoffs and landings of a plane. By this time next year, the new, more relaxed rules could already be implemented.

However, cell phones would still be left off the list of usable devices during these times on a flight.

The FAA set up an industry working group last year comprised of employees from Boeing, Amazon, the Consumer Electronics Association, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Association of Flight Attendants, aircraft companies, etc. The group first met in January to begin studying whether electronic devices really affect a plane's avionics or not.



The study is not only focusing on tablets and e-readers, but also future devices like Google's Glass product (augmented reality glasses) and Apple's upcoming smart watch. 

The group is expected to present its findings by July 31, 2013. 

While the group may announce that certain mobile devices are safe for takeoffs and landings, the gadgets will still have to be set in airplane mode during those times. 

The upcoming report from the industry group hopes to accomplish a system where flight attendants don't have to police passengers as far as what devices can be used and whether they're in airplane mode or not. It also hopes to move from having several regulations to just one set, which covers the proper devices and their use. 

The FAA has set rules that make it so passengers cannot use electronic devices like smartphones, tablets and e-readers during takeoff and landing on a flight. However, there is no solid proof that electronics affect the way a plane performs. This has been in question for some time, but the FAA continues to impose these rules on passengers, and it has caused panic and even injuries among those who travel by plane. For instance, a 68-year-old man punched a 15-year-old on a plane when the teenager refused to turn off his smartphone during a flight. According to the man, he was doing it to save the entire plane from any harmful consequences.

But in early December 2011, the FAA raised a few eyebrows when allowing American Airlines pilots to use iPads in the cockpit. The FAA allowed iPads to replace paper manuals and charts, and they could be used during takeoff and landing.

In December 2012, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) pressured the FAA to allow greater use of electronic devices during takeoff and landing because "they empower people to stay informed and connected with friends and family, and they enable both large and small businesses to be more productive and efficient, helping drive economic growth and boost U.S. competitiveness."

Source: The New York Times



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Common sense.
By Gunbuster on 3/25/2013 3:26:27 PM , Rating: 5
If having electronics turned on posed any real risk they would not have an operating procedure that is 100% comprised of having 5 employees walk down an isle of 600 people, eyeball it, and then say we’re good.




RE: Common sense.
By jjlj on 3/25/2013 3:28:27 PM , Rating: 3
Plus 1, lol.


RE: Common sense.
By 3DoubleD on 3/25/2013 3:49:37 PM , Rating: 2
I've always thought most of the fuss was more about having heavy, hard, loose objects flying through the passenger compartment during the unlikely event of a malfunction during landing and takeoff. It is during these times mechanical failure is most likely.

A sudden change in altitude or other abrupt acceleration could send whatever is in your hands flying. I'd rather be hit by a newspaper, magazine, or book than a tablet or laptop (although I guess that would somewhat depend on the book! - beware of flying textbooks).

But it is true, they use the honor system when it comes to disabling any wireless communications, so it mustn't be an urgent issue. You'd also think that if a cell phone could generate a strong enough signal to cause a problem, planes would be prone to frequent malfunctions from all sorts of radio signals from both terrestrial and extra-terrestrial sources.

There is also the argument that they want your full attention during take-off and landing. If you have headphones in, you might miss an important announcement... but if the plane is going down... you'd probably notice even with headphones in. They also have no problem with people sleeping during take-off or landing. If they needed you to be alert then they'd wake everyone up.


RE: Common sense.
By Rukkian on 3/25/2013 5:16:00 PM , Rating: 2
I guess pretty much any hardcover is at least as bad as most tablets.

The issue that this now brings up - since they are saying tablets are okay, but cell phones are not, who decides which is which? There are 5.5" Phablets, with reports of 6+" phones on the horizon. Is this okay? What about an ipod touch (not a phone)? Will the attendants now have to go around measuring screens?


RE: Common sense.
By GreenEnvt on 3/26/2013 6:42:21 AM , Rating: 2
I agree, though it seems the devices can do something the pilots can notice though. A few years ago I was on a plane coming into Sao Paulo, Brazil. A guy a couple seats over turned on his phone as we were descending. Within 30 seconds the captain came on the PA in an angry voice and said "Whoever just turned on a cell phone turn it off! we're trying to land the plane!"

No idea how he knew. The attendants were all seated for landing already, so I'd assume it must have caused some sort of interference on some equipment.


RE: Common sense.
By Dorkyman on 3/26/2013 12:15:40 PM , Rating: 2
No studies have EVER shown interference. Mythbusters couldn't find a connection either. Avionics have excellent shielding.

I expect that probably 50% of smartphone users don't bother to either turn their phones off or put them in airplane mode. So the cabin is full of fully-operational devices. And still no issues.

No, I have to conclude it's nothing more than a control issue.


RE: Common sense.
By marvdmartian on 3/26/2013 10:47:44 AM , Rating: 2
I can't tell you how many times I've seen people, as the flight attendant make the "turn off all electronic devices" annoucement, simply turn their devices, inluding cell phones, to standby, versus turning them all the way off. And, so far, we're okay, since none of those planes crashed.

I believe the phones they need to worry about are the older (read: DINOSAUR) models, that emit more than recent models do. In other words, like the phone I carry, and ensure is turned all the way off, when flying! LOL


"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki