Print 44 comment(s) - last by ghost49x.. on Mar 27 at 9:48 PM

No fuel cell vehicles from VW on the horizon

A few years ago there were a number of automotive manufacturers putting serious money into hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. These vehicles promised to have a driving range similar to a conventional gasoline-powered automobile, but produce no emissions to pollute the atmosphere.
However, the vehicles faced several daunting challenges, including the lack of a hydrogen fuel infrastructure and the fact that hydrogen is highly flammable and difficult to store.

Volkswagen CEO Martin Winterkorn stated this week that hydrogen fuel cells have failed to live up to promises and are unlikely to become an efficient and cost-effective way to power cars in the near future.

Winterkorn said, "I do not see the infrastructure for fuel cell vehicles, and I do not see how hydrogen can be produced on large scale at reasonable cost. I do not currently see a situation where we can offer fuel cell vehicles at a reasonable cost that consumers would also be willing to pay."

While Volkswagen doesn't see a near-term future with hydrogen vehicles, other manufacturers continue to move forward with the technology. Mercedes-Benz reached a deal with Ford and Nissan-Renault with a goal of selling the first production fuel-cell vehicle starting in 2017.
Back in 2010, a study was published predicting 670,000 fuel cell powered vehicles would be sold annually within a decade. So far, that prediction doesn't seem likely to come true.

Source: Auto News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: The Real Problem is..
By ritualm on 3/22/2013 4:50:04 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, it probably wouldn't. Hydrogen being lighter than air would tend to leave the open barrel rapidly while gasoline vapors, being heavier than air, will linger. A leaky gas tank is a much larger fire danger than a leaky hydrogen tank. The biggest problem is that to store enough hydrogen to fuel a vehicle you need to use compressed gas cylinders or some other expensive or unproven method.

Hydrogen, with current technology, needs to be a pressurized gas. This is a problem, not just because of issues arising from rapid depressurization of the fuel tank, but also the volatility of the gas itself.

When was the last time hydrogen reacted with open air? You get the Hindenberg disaster. In a car, the best case scenario is the fuel tank stays relatively intact ... and that very rarely happens. A single leak from a gasoline-powered car isn't enough to destroy it and kill everyone onboard, as you also need an electrical spark or fire elsewhere. A single leak from a pressurized hydrogen gas tank gives you an explosion, destroying the entire car and killing everyone onboard.

This is why propane has a pungent smell added to the mixture - if you can smell it, get out of whatever you're in before you die to the leak going ablaze. Hydrogen as a fuel is more dangerous than THAT.

“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki