Print 71 comment(s) - last by random2.. on Mar 23 at 5:18 AM

Russia's meteor  (Source:
NASA needs funding for small meteor defense

NASA told Congress to "pray" if a meteor similar to the one that hit Russia last month is ever three weeks away from the U.S.

NASA administrator Charles Bolden Jr. told Congress that the U.S. doesn't have the proper equipment to identify a small meteor (the size of Russia's meteor) in a House Committee hearing on Tuesday.

"If it's coming in three weeks ... pray," Bolden said. "The reason I can't do anything in the next three weeks is because for decades we have put it off. We are where we are today because, you know, you all told us to do something and between the administration and the Congress, the funding to do that did not - the bottom line is always the funding did not come."

The U.S. is able to detect larger meteors (and offset them a bit by crashing a spacecraft into them, thus slowing them down and changing their course) with plenty of in advance, but smaller objects are more difficult because the sun blinds satellites. That's precisely why Russia didn't see the meteor coming -- and neither did the U.S. 

Had the meteor not stayed intact for only seconds longer, it would have had the impact of 20 Hiroshima bombs once hitting Russia, according to a CBS News report

Donald Yeomans, manager of NASA's Near-Earth Object Program Office, said that the U.S. needs a space-based infrared telescope to see smaller objects coming. This particular telescope would work because the sun wouldn't be an issue in blocking sight of the objects. 

Yeomans also suggested ground-based wide field optical telescopes that could keep an eye on large parts of the sky at night. 

The space-based infrared telescope would cost "a few hundred million dollars."

However, government funding remains an issue. Bolden said NASA was budgeted only $20.5 million for its near-Earth object observation program for fiscal 2012. 

While NASA doesn't see any large meteors coming toward Earth in the foreseeable future (and current large meteor detection equipment would know decades in advance), small meteors need to be taken seriously as well to prevent destruction. 

The Chelyabinsk meteor exploded over Russia on February 15, 2013. It was estimated to be traveling at 40,000 MPH and was about 11,000 tonnes. 

Source: CBS News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Bad Site?
By Labotomizer on 3/20/2013 5:17:36 PM , Rating: 3
Actually it's doing better than Chrome/Firefox. Those two share the same "safe site" database. Daily Tech itself is fine. I have had IE10 block several attempted java based exploits over the last week though. It didn't need to block the whole website to nullify the attack.

And those attacks are why DT ended up on their blacklist.

RE: Bad Site?
By maugrimtr on 3/21/2013 9:39:52 AM , Rating: 1
It's doing worse if it allows you to access a known unsafe site. Also IE's blockers are like Chrome's - they're not failsafe - a good enough attacker can bypass them with a bit of work which is why Chrome doesn't overly rely on IE's approach. IE simply doesn't take the same shutdown approach as Chrome. Dailytech is NOT fine when reported as hosting malware.

RE: Bad Site?
By random2 on 3/23/2013 5:18:13 AM , Rating: 2
Malwarebytes Anti-Malware - Stops pests dead in their tracks.

"This is from the It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki