backtop


Print 28 comment(s) - last by Piiman.. on May 4 at 11:32 AM

Exploiting iPad flaw proves costly for researcher, despite relatively responsible disclosure process

Nearly four years behind bars; that's the fate a New York security "researcher" faces after being found guilty by a jury of his peers and sentenced by a federal judge on cybercrime charges involving his 2010 exploitation of a flaw in the security of iPad service provider AT&T. He allegedly used the flaw to expose the email address of over 100,000 individuals.

I. A Leaky Hole

The story began in June 2010.  Apple, Inc. (AAPL) had just released the first generation iPad, a tablet computer that transformed the form factor from overlooked to in vogue.  And the service provider du jour for iPads with 3G data connectivity was AT&T, Inc. (T).  

But AT&T's iPad support services had a relatively minor, but notable security flaw.  AT&T's iPad-related servers ran a script that accepted an ICC-ID (integrated circuit card identifiers), an identifier unique to each device.  

If sent a valid ICC-ID, the script served up the personal email of the subscriber associated with that device.  AT&T had planned to use the feature to generate a slick AJAX-style response on its web applications for the iPad.

iPad hole
AT&T left a gaping hole in their iPad web scripts. [Image Source: DailyTech/Jason Mick]

But Andrew Auernheimer, Daniel Spitler, and other hackers with the profanely named "troll" hacker collective Goatse Security identified the vulnerability when they were probing AT&T's servers.  They quickly wrote a so-called "data slurper" -- a script that performed a brute force attack, working through tables of ICC-IDs and recording the ones that received a response.

AT&T apologized for the breach and took down the script, closing its hole.

II. Investigation, Trial Conclude in Guilty Verdict

But the damage was already done.  Goatse Sec. had published its results to the blog site Gawker, revealing parts of a data set that contained roughly 114,000 email addresses.  Among the high-profile figures exposed were ABC News anchor Diane Sawyer, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, and current Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

Soon after the data loss, U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation agents investigating the incident conducted a raid on the home Mr. Auernheimer who had moved from New York to a residence in Arkansas.  Mr. Auernheimer, aka "weev" or "Escher Auernheimer" was arrested by federal agents on suspicion of computer crimes.  Authorities also allegedly found cocaine, LSD, and ecstasy in his residence.  Lawyers for Mr. Auernheimer contend that the raid was unnecessary and illegal.  The security "researcher" has yet to face charges on the drugs found.

However, he was charged with one count of conspiracy to access servers without permission and one count of identity theft.  These offenses -- spelled out in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of 1986 (18 USC § 1030) -- carry a maximum sentence of five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000 USD.

Andrew Auernheimer
Goatse Security "researcher" Andrew Auernheimer was found guilty of two counts of computer crimes and may be sentenced to up to five years in prison, pending appeal. [Image Source: AP]

Mr. Auernheimer was charged in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, the location where his co-defendant (Daniel Spitler) was charged.  Initially, federal authorities had planned to charge the two members separately, which would have resulted in a trial of Mr. Auernheimer in an Arkansas District Court.  However, the case was eventually shuffled to the New Jersey District Court.

In June 2011, Mr. Spitler, aka "JacksonBrown" pled guilty to the two cybercrimes counts, in hopes of receiving a lighter sentence.  He is currently awaiting sentencing.

Mr. Auernheimer fought the charges, and but the triakl with the jury finding Mr. Auernheimer guilty of both counts, despite the fact that Mr. Auernheimer only accessed a gaping open system.

III. Auernheimer to Cyber-Dissidents: Rise Up

Four months after that guilty verdict Mr. Auernheimer seems more at peace with his coming time behind bars.  He participated in a mostly lighthearted 
Reddit AmA ("Ask Me Anything") on Sunday before the sentencing.  

Ironically, prosecutors tried to turn Mr. Auernheier's upbeat and sarcastic Reddit comments against him at the sentencing hearing the next day.  They pushed for 4 years -- nearly the maximum sentence.  The judge instead sentenced him to a slightly shorter 41 months sentence, to be followed by 3 years of supervised release, during which time his electronic behavior will be monitored.

The accused read John Keats' The Fall of Hyperion and told reporters at a press conference, "I'm going to jail for doing arithmetic."

Andrew Auernheimer
Andrew Auernheimer will soon be headed to a nearly four year stay in prison.
[Image Source: The Verge]

The statement comes just months after his proclamation that he hoped he would get the maximum 5 year sentence to encourage Anonymous and other cyber-rebels to "rise up and storm the decks."

He and his co-defendant Mr. Spitler will have to pay $73,000 USD in restitution if the verdict sticks.  Mr. Auernehimer is currently appealing the sentence.  His attorney, Tor Ekeland told The Verge in an interview that courts are divided on what exactly constitutes "unauthorized access" in the CFAA, pointing to a possible route for the appeal.

Source: The Verge



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Not consistent
By Shadowself on 3/19/2013 8:54:59 AM , Rating: 5
These two are not consistent:
quote:
Exploiting iPad flaw proves costly for researcher, despite relatively responsible disclosure process

Nearly four years behind bars; that's the fate a New York security "researcher" faces after being found guilty by a jury of his peers and sentenced by a federal judge on cybercrime charges involving his 2010 exploitation of a flaw in the security of iPad service provider AT&T. He allegedly used the flaw to expose the email address of over 100,000 individuals.


But then Jason has never shied away from an inaccurate headline that says something negative about an Apple product or Apple itself. Yes, the article does go on to explain that AT&T was the source of the flaw, not Apple, but this does not explain the headline.

And since when is 41 months "nearly four years". It's less than 3.5 years. In any decent mathematics class they would have taught that you round to the nearest whole number or "over three years".




RE: Not consistent
By Newspapercrane on 3/19/2013 9:27:48 AM , Rating: 3
Maybe Mick should get "Nearly 4 Years" in jail for FAILING to do Arithmetic.


RE: Not consistent
By vol7ron on 3/19/2013 9:48:41 AM , Rating: 2
I think the flaw was regarding ICCID of iPads, therefore it was iPad owners that were affected.

To be fully functional, iPad w/internet has both a manufacturer (Apple) and service provider (AT&T). Though it may have been AT&T's fault, they still had the contract and ownership data.


RE: Not consistent
By Reclaimer77 on 3/19/2013 4:29:11 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
And since when is 41 months "nearly four years". It's less than 3.5 years. In any decent mathematics class they would have taught that you round to the nearest whole number or "over three years".


Okay ass, talk about a nitpick. I mean seriously, you're joking right? I guess you think a headline like "A little less than three and a half years" flows better??

Anyway back on topic, once again our "Justice" system shows complete and utter contempt for it's citizens, those they supposedly swore to protect and uphold justice.

This guys life is, for all intents and purposes, now ruined. At most a "crime" like this should warrant a house arrest or some form of supervised parole community service, something, slap on the wrist. Instead, like far FAR too many Americans, we're shipping him off to hardcore prison. For doing what exactly??

quote:
Yes, the article does go on to explain that AT&T was the source of the flaw, not Apple, but this does not explain the headline.


The flaw was on the iPad though. Yes, it's AT&T's fault, but the product in question was the iPad, no getting around that. You're coming off like a butthurt fanboi, Jason in a journalist and his job is to make topics seem interesting. He's not trying to make Apple "look bad" here, give me a break.


"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki