Print 89 comment(s) - last by Florinator.. on Mar 15 at 11:43 AM

The decision to use it has been very controversial

A Colorado judge will allow prosecutors to interrogate theater gunman James Holmes using truth serum if he pleads not guilty by reason of insanity.

Holmes is the suspected gunman involved in the movie theater shooting in Aurora, Colorado last July. Holmes has been charged with multiple counts of murder for the open shooting, which killed 12 people and injured another 58.

Colorado Judge William Sylvester ruled that prosecutors have the choice to use truth serum on Holmes in a "narcoanalytic interview" to determine whether or not he was legally insane during the July 20 shooting last year. But this is only if Holmes pleads not guilty by reason of insanity.

A plea of not guilty had been entered for Holmes yesterday after his lawyer said that the defendant was not ready to enter his own plea. Holmes can later change it.

Legal experts have questioned Judge Sylvester's ruling, saying that taking away the fifth amendment rights of the defendant because of an authorization to use truth serum drugs will raise a lot of fifth amendment-related issues.

Also, a jury may object to the court forcing truth serum upon the defendant.

Medical experts have weighed in as well, saying that the defendant still has the ability to lie while using truth serum. They also said that truth serum would be effective at determining Holmes' current state of mind, but a short-acting barbiturate like truth serum would not indicate his state of mind during last year's shooting. It will only loosen him up to talk about it.

"First of all, people can still lie under the influence of amytal," said Dr. August Piper, a psychiatrist from Seattle. "More importantly, the person under the influence of the drug is susceptible to outside suggestion. To try and do this would be unlikely to yield useful information, and could pervert the course of justice by rendering the defendant susceptible to pressure."

It's unclear exactly which drug will be used, but experts predict short-acting sodium amytal.

Sources: NPR, CBS News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Can't accept this
By nafhan on 3/13/2013 2:54:02 PM , Rating: 2
Capital punishment is to appease the blood lust in the populace
wut? I personally think a life sentence for a 20-something is a lot worse for everyone involved. Honestly, who benefits from keeping this guy locked in a cell for 50+ years? Those running the prisons?

RE: Can't accept this
By FaaR on 3/14/2013 7:51:13 AM , Rating: 2
Those who primarily benefit are the masses of those innocently convicted of crimes they did not commit, because you can release an innocent man from jail, but you cannot release an innocent man from death.

...But I suppose such feats of logic and thinking are beyond you.

RE: Can't accept this
By SlyNine on 3/14/2013 1:41:27 PM , Rating: 2
To add to that. It has happened, convicted murderers proved innocent years later. Thank god they didn't kill those people.

It's not that I'm against putting someone to death, but people shouldn't be so f'ing gun-ho about it.

"This is from the It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh

Related Articles

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki