China Jumps to IPv6 While U.S. Moves Slowly Away From IPv4
March 11, 2013 6:19 PM
comment(s) - last by
China's state ISP rolls out next generation standard
The ever-present desire for censorship may be the carrot, but for whatever reason China has a head start on
. Even as the U.S. moves sluggishly towards the next generation internet address protocol, 3TNet -- China's state-provided broadband internet and public video service -- has made the switch.
The upside of IPv6 is one that's likely highly desirable in China -- more space. IPv4, the previous standard, only allows 4.3 billion unique web addresses. With over a billion people, China may surpass that total in domestic pages alone.
IPv6 is also expected to beef up security. Using a technology called Source Address Validation Architecture (SAVA), IPv6 networks establish a relationship based on multiple trusted interactions across a network. This can help beat so-called "IP spoofing" attacks, and advances the current version of IPv6 over
less secure earlier versions
A U.S. Navy sponsored
made public this week, authored by the
New England Complex Systems Institute
, listed identity trust and the lack of addressing space as the two biggest shortcomings of the widespread and successful IPv4.
Running out of room, China has turned to IPv6 for more space and security.
[Image Source: Digital Trends]
That's not to say IPv6 doesn't have its potential problems as well. While the new protocol increases addressing space by 80 trillion or so, some fear it provides too fine grain identification, eliminating anonymity on sensitive locations like private networks. There's also fear that the technology's ability to uniquely identify traffic sources could be
overstated by the layman
(as people could still hack into your device and do mischief on your precise IP).
Ultimately China may be eager to de-anonymize its citizens as well. The nation has long fought to control its citizens' internet activities; now it has a far finer form of tracking. However, it may not be immediately available to bump its domestic surveillance capabilities, as the extra information requires extra data mining and new analysis algorithms to store and process into useful results.
[Image Source: Boot Click]
For now, Chinese citizens are mostly enjoying the benefits of IPv6 alone -- more space and more security.
, an information systems specialist at the
University of Maryland
, who also chairs the
Chinese American Network Symposium
, says that China is far ahead of the U.S. in IPv6 deployment. In an interview with
, he comments on 3TNet, "China has a national internet backbone in place that operates under IPv6 as the native network protocol. We have nothing like that in the US."
China is also leading the U.S. in some other high tech ventures, such as
deploying high speed rail
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
3/12/2013 12:43:58 AM
NAT is exaclty why there is no excuse to not having IPV6 enabled on the internet. At this point from our modem on could be IPV4 and the broad internet could be based on IPV6. I've been out of college for 4 years and this was a hot topic then. It just needs to get done. NAT was a stop-gap solution from the start. The fact that we are discussing this in the first place is inane like it is some kind of new revolutionary solution to the address shortage. The problem arose mid 90's! Not last week. So we have had to use this workaround for almost 20 years so far. Connected devices aren't reducing in number over the years, therefore we need more address space.
Following this logic we should call up all the device makers and tell them 2GB of ram is enough forever because we don't want to bother with 64-bit memory addressing. Or why even stop there we could just run our computers with 64KB / 1MB / 16MB (depending on pinout) of ram because that was 16-bit and simpler and easier, why try and move forward?.. Let's just keep it simple.
3/12/2013 1:15:02 AM
Agreed. NAT is a patch for backward compatibility and shouldn't be an argument for the reverse, especially since it has it's own limitations.
3/12/2013 3:09:17 PM
But NAT is not viewed that way in large and small organizations its viewed as SOP. There is no cost benefit for companies to switching to IPv6 and in most cases the opposite is true for companies running less than modern switching equipment that doesn't support both IPv4 and IPv6 simultaneously couple that with training and simple things like application compatibility and you have a gigantic expense with zero ROI(other that being the cool kid early adopter). I don't see anyone or and standards body successfully selling IPv6.
"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki
China's Turns on World's Longest High Speed Rail Conduit
December 27, 2012, 12:02 PM
Countdown to June 6 IPv6 Transition Begins at Google
January 18, 2012, 4:41 PM
U.S. Legal System Finally Figures Out IP Address != Specific Person
May 4, 2011, 3:07 PM
Weak IPv6 Security Leaves Computers Wide Open
July 22, 2008, 8:40 AM
Windows 8.x Marketshare Fell During September, Windows 7 Still King
October 2, 2014, 12:00 PM
"Mo' Money", Less Problems: Google Offers Cold Hard Cash for Finding Its Browser Bugs
October 1, 2014, 3:04 PM
eBay to Spin Off PayPal Business Next Year
September 30, 2014, 7:28 AM
Facebook to Use Your Browsing Data to Sell Offsite Display Ads
September 29, 2014, 3:52 PM
After Microsoft Complains, EU Rejects Google's Search Settlement for Second Time
September 23, 2014, 4:58 PM
Microsoft Expands Free Office 365 to All College Students
September 22, 2014, 3:21 PM
Most Popular Articles
New AT&T Mobile Share Value "Double Data" Promotion Lasts Through October
September 28, 2014, 8:32 AM
TiVo Mega Features 24TB of Storage, Can Record Three Years* Worth of TV Content
September 8, 2014, 8:45 AM
Tesla Motors Confirms Nevada Gigafactory Deal, Will Receive $1.25B in Tax Breaks
September 4, 2014, 8:24 PM
FBI Outraged That Apple, Google are Adopting Digital "Locks" to Protect Users
September 26, 2014, 1:00 PM
Samsung Takes on All Challengers with 5.7” Galaxy Note 4, 5.6” Galaxy Note Edge
September 3, 2014, 10:00 AM
Latest Blog Posts
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information