Print 35 comment(s) - last by Paj.. on Mar 13 at 8:35 AM

More vegetation could speed up warming in the short term

Humans may be concerned about global warming, but nature for its part appears to be adapting.  A new study by a team of international experts examining the latest satellite and weather station data from The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) suggests that the rate of change in vegetation in middle Canada (the so-called boreal region) is leveling off, while the vegetation in the northernmost tundra is dramatically increasing during summer months.

I. Vegetation Growth is Rapidly Increasing in Permafrost Region

The vegetation in turn is causing a so-called "amplified warming" effect -- by the vegetation limiting the snow cover, which in turn provides a darker, less reflective surface that absorbs sunlight and traps heat.

The study, funded by NASA, finds that vegetation is effectively shifting northward approximately 7 degrees.  Dr. Compton Tucker a Senior Scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, comments, "As a result of the enhanced warming over a longer ground-thaw season, the total amount of heat available for plant growth in these northern latitudes is increasing. This created during the past 30 years large patches of vigorously productive vegetation, totaling more than a third of the northern landscape -- over 9 million km2, which is roughly about the area of the USA -- resembling the vegetation that occurs further to the south."

Plant growth
Plant growth in the Canadian permafrost region is dramatically increasing.
[Image Source: NASA]

Terry Callaghan a climatology Professor at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences and the University of Sheffield, UK, comments, "The reduction of vegetation seasonality, resulting in increased greenness in the Arctic, is visible on the ground as an increasing abundance of tall shrubs and tree incursions in several locations all over the circumpolar Arctic."

A clue to where vegetation growth will eventually reach may be found in the boreal, region where vegetation previously greatly increased, but is now leveling off.  The slowing of boreal growth is more pronounced in North America than in the Russian north.  Ultimately, the vegetation in the melting permafrost region is self-limiting, as it will saturate the more northern latitude.

II. Study Doesn't Consider Carbon Trapping Properties of Vegetation

Researchers warn that this trend may lead to increasing forest fires and droughts in boreal regions, where vegetation growth is slowing.  Using "17 state-of-the-art climate model simulations", the researchers predict that compared to the 1951-1980 reference period, the model suggests that by 2100 the net latitude shift could reach 20 degrees.

However, the researchers acknowledge that flat-lining temperatures over the last decade caused the models to overshoot vegetation estimates substantially.  Bruce Anderson a Professor of Earth and Environment at Boston University, remarks, "Since we don't know the actual trajectory of atmospheric concentration of various agents capable of forcing a change in climate, long-term projections should be interpreted cautiously."

permafrost melting
Extra vegetation may melt permafrost may decrease reflectivity and increase greenhouse gases, but it may also soak up carbon.
[Image Source: Vladimir Romanovsky]

The researchers suggest the change in vegetation growth regions could substantially impact the timber and agricultural industries.  They also are concerned that melting in the north could release pockets of methane and other greenhouse gases that are trapped in the permafrost.

One major oversight of the study is that it does not fully examine the ability of the extra vegetation to absorb atmospheric carbon.  It seems like that while a reduction in reflectivity certainly will amplify heating, that fresh plant growth will soak up carbon.  Ultimately, this means that if the north greens to the extent that the study predicts, the extra carbon trapping could substantially reduce ongoing warming.

The study was published in the prestigious peer-reviewed journal Nature: Climate Change.

Source: Boston University [PDF]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: ipcc
By ShieTar on 3/12/2013 6:15:22 AM , Rating: 2
"interpreted cautiously" for any thinking person should be understood as "stop any actions that MIGHT kill a few billion people", not the version apparently preferred by many americans: "Lets keep doing what we are doing because we don't know yet what exact kind of catastrophe it will cause."

Just because it is impossible to exactly predict the weather 4 weeks in the future does not make it impossible to predict snowfall in canada next winter. There has not been any doubt on climate change in the scientific community for a good 25 years now, the alps are glacier-free and australia is dying from annual droughts. The only people making up reasons against climate change are the same guys that told us smoking was healthy 20 years ago, because they get paid to do so.

Climate science is researching minor additions and corrections to the well-understood and well-established climate model that keeps making the same prediction since 30 years.

"This is from the It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki