Obama's AG Won't Rule Out Drone Death Strikes on U.S. Soil
March 6, 2013 12:34 PM
comment(s) - last by
Holder argues Congressional authorization is unnecessary to kill Americans, Executive Branch can do what it wants
President Barack Obama's (D) Attorney General,
, dropped a bombshell this week,
[PDF] that he did consider it acceptable to kill Americans with drone deathstrikes on U.S. soil, but only under "extraordinary" circumstances.
I. A Time to Kill?
He says that such plots had never been performed in the homeland to date. But several Americans have reportedly been killed with drone strikes in the Middle East during the Obama regime was elected into power in 2008.
AG Holder's comments came in response to
Sen. Rand Paul
(R-Tenn.). Sen. Paul had promised to stall the nomination of John Brennan to become director of the
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency
. Mr. Brennan is a controversial figure who helped mastermind the program of drone deathstrikes and "enhanced interrogation" (torture) programs in the Middle East.
AG Eric Holder told Sen. Rand Paul that "hypothetically" drone strikes could be used on U.S. soil to kill Americans. [Image Source: AP]
In his letter to Sen. Paul, seeking to clarify when drone strikes would be allowed, AG Holder writes:
The question you posed is.... entirely hypothetical, unlikely to occur, and one we hope no President will ever have to confront. It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States.
Holder goes on to point to Pearl Harbor and the terrorist attacks of 9/11/2001 as examples of the kinds of threats that might require Americans to be ordered killed by the President.
II. Armed and Ready, Flying Over Your Backyard
Since the middle of the last decade,
flying over U.S. states
, ostensibly for use in countering drug trafficking and other forms of crime. Of late, some of these drones
have been reportedly armed
Reaper drones are currently being used over U.S. airspace. [Image Source: The Real Revo]
There are currently no formal laws passed by Congress governing whom and be killed and when – if the President's premise that death strikes on Americans does not violate Constitutional due process holds true. Further, such strikes appear entirely at the discretion of the President, the military, and the national intelligence agencies -- Congress is not in the loop.
That seems rather curious. The Constitution is unequivocal in that Congress alone has the power to authorize the use of deadly military force.
Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution
, the foundation of the U.S. government, clearly grants Congress the power:
[Image Source: EL Civics]
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;
To provide and maintain a navy;
To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces;
To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions;
However, according to President Obama and his staff's logic, that power has now been transferred to the executive branch, and what's more, it can be used to kill Americans without a trial on U.S. soil.
The Obama administration argues sometimes American citizens may need to be killed without due process, both abroad and at home. [Image Source: Matt Ortega/Flickr]
The Obama adminstration executed a similar privilege overseas at least once -- ordering a drone strike that killed suspected al-Qaeda terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki, who happened to also be a New Mexico-born U.S. citizen. Other Americans were also killed in other drone strikes, but it is unclear whether those killings were ordered or mere inadvertent attrition.
III. Some Upset About Obama's New Power to Kill Americans
Sen. Paul was not happy with the Obama administration's plan to grant itself the power to kill, and to cut Congress out of the loop. He
, "The U.S. attorney general's refusal to rule out the possibility of drone strikes on American citizens and on American soil is more than frightening. It is an affront to the constitutional due process rights of all Americans."
Some in the Senate feel the President shouldn't have the power to order the killings of Americans on U.S. soil. [Image Source: Drone Wars UK]
But some of his colleagues weren't so harsh.
Sen. Susan Collins
Sens. Ron Wyden
(D-Colo.) praised the President's
decision to hand over memos
detailing when drone strikes were allowable.
The Obama administration had previously
asked its press secretaries to lie
about the existence of the memos, claiming they didn't exist. In light of the disclosure, the Senators say in a
, "We are pleased that we now have the access that we have long sought and need to conduct the vigilant oversight with which the committee has been charged. We believe that this sets an important precedent for applying our American system of checks and balances to the challenges of 21st century warfare. We look forward to reviewing and discussing these documents in the days ahead."
The Senate now moves on to debate Mr. Brennan's confirmation, following his confirmation by the
Senate Intelligence Committee
. There will likely be lively debate from Sen. Paul,
, during Mr. Brennan's confirmation hearing before the full Senate.
The debate brings to mind the words of George Orwell in an essay on wartime Britain, who wrote, "As I write, highly civilized human beings are flying overhead, trying to kill me."
Sen. Rand Paul [PDF]
Sen. Wyden, et al.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Can Someone Explain?
3/6/2013 4:10:05 PM
Shouldn't be concerned? What about collateral damage? What about The Fifth Amendment? This is about U.S. citizens on U.S. soil. There is no oversight of these proposed drone strikes, let alone due process.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself,
nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law
; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Obviously the President has perfect/God-like judgement, so due process doesn't matter...
Holder's domestic drone strikes are still hypothetical, but the proposition reeks of a willingness to subvert human rights. This, and the fact that he stands behind Fast and Furious (selling/giving guns to Mexican cartels), have me convinced that Mr. Holder is not concerned about endangering us to achieve his goals.
“And I don't know why [Apple is] acting like it’s superior. I don't even get it. What are they trying to say?” -- Bill Gates on the Mac ads
Former Press Secretary: Obama Admin. Tried to Conceal Drone Strikes on Americans
February 25, 2013, 2:01 PM
Obama Admin. to Release Classified Memo Detailing Drone Death Strikes on Americans
February 7, 2013, 11:10 AM
Can U.S. Citizen Shoot Down Domestic Spy Drones? Question Looms
September 14, 2012, 3:50 PM
EFF: Police May Use Armed Drones to Watch You, Citizen Help Needed
June 12, 2012, 2:36 PM
Dawn of the Drones
June 6, 2008, 6:15 PM
Dow Chemical to NYC City Council: You Don't Even Know What Styrofoam is!
December 2, 2013, 8:30 PM
Retired Israel Air Force Commander: UAVs Need to Dogfight Before Replacing Fighter Pilots
November 27, 2013, 3:59 PM
Eating High-Fat Diet During Puberty May Increase Speed of Breast Cancer Development
November 27, 2013, 2:15 PM
Mayor Bloomberg Says No More Polystyrene Foam Dishes in NYC, Says it Can Cause Cancer
November 25, 2013, 11:51 AM
NASA Rejects Billionaire's Mission to Mars
November 22, 2013, 12:31 PM
Southwest Airlines Gives Passengers Wi-Fi Access from Gate to Gate
November 21, 2013, 12:15 PM
Most Popular Articles
NSA Snares Americans' Porn Viewing Histories in Effort to Target Muslims
December 1, 2013, 9:00 PM
Coalition of 20+ Tech Firms Backs MRAM as Potential DRAM, NAND Replacement
November 29, 2013, 11:59 PM
Fed Up With Cheating OEMs, Microsoft Trolls Chromebooks in New Ad
November 27, 2013, 4:09 PM
Xbox? PCs? Mobile? Microsoft Wants One Windows to Rule Them All
November 25, 2013, 8:21 PM
Seattle Restaurant Bans Google Glass, Tells Wearers to "Just shut up and get out"
November 27, 2013, 10:27 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
AT&T Explores $100B+ USD Deal to Acquire Vodafone's European Operations
Nov 4, 2013, 7:34 AM
U.S. Army Developing Cyber, Electronic War Arsenal
Oct 31, 2013, 4:49 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information