EU to Microsoft: We're Fining You $730M USD for Browser Ballot "Mistake"
March 6, 2013 5:04 PM
comment(s) - last by
EU's continues to milk its favorite cash cow
How much does "whoops" cost? If you're Microsoft Corp. (
) the answer is $731M USD.
The EU pummeled Microsoft this week with a €561M fine for
defying its browser selection edict
, which called for
special features to be added to versions of Windows
sold in the European Union.
The European Commission has imposed a €561 million fine on Microsoft for failing to comply with its commitments to offer users a browser choice screen enabling them to easily choose their preferred web browser. In 2009, the Commission had made these commitments legally binding on Microsoft until 2014 (see IP/09/1941). In today's decision, the Commission finds that Microsoft failed to roll out the browser choice screen with its Windows 7 Service Pack 1 from May 2011 until July 2012. 15 million Windows users in the EU therefore did not see the choice screen during this period. Microsoft has acknowledged that the choice screen was not displayed during that time.
The fine brings the Commission's total looting of Microsoft on antitrust violations to
around $2.8B USD
. Microsoft's latest violation traces back in 2009, during the launch of Windows 7. At the time, Microsoft held a dominant position in the browser market thanks to its bundling of its Internet Explorer (IE) browser with its market-leading operating system.
Rival browser makers complained and the
EU sided with them
, mandating Microsoft to supply a "ballot" screen allowing users to pick between IE and third-party browsers like Google Inc.'s (
) Chrome or Mozilla's Firefox.
Microsoft is facing more big fines for breaking the EU's rules. [Image Source: AFP]
And the approach worked. It appeared that the most powerful thing driving Microsoft's market share was inertia; most users simply never bothered to download or try other browsers, sticking with the one that was built in. Once they were presented with a choice, they jumped ship from IE.
Microsoft clearly wasn't happy with this, but it promised to comply with the EU ruling.
Then in May 2011, it release
Windows 7 Service Pack 1
, which "accidentally" removed the browser selection screen due to a "coding error". Despite
multiple warnings from the EU
, Microsoft didn't bother to fix this little "whoops" until over a year had gone past. As a result the EU
opened new proceedings
, which culminated with this week's massive fine.
Today Microsoft is in third place in the PC browser market with only about 24 percent of the market, behind Google 35 percent and Mozilla's 29 percent. But the EU argues vigorous enforcement must continue in order to prevent Microsoft from repeating history and gaining a dominant market position through anticompetitive tactics.
One apparent flaw in the EUs logic, though, is that the antitrust regulators fail to hold mobile operating system makers like Google or Apple, Inc. (
) to a similar standard. Apple -- whose iPad tablet accounts for the majority of tablet sales -- and Android -- who accounts for the majority of smartphone sales -- both only package their devices with their own proprietary built in browser. The question remains -- how is that monopoly-promoted bundling any different than what Microsoft did?
Smartphone market leader Google has not been required to provide a browser ballot to phone subscribers by the EU.
But for better or worse the EU appears content to make Microsoft its whipping boy. Microsoft will likely appeal the fine, but past appeals have
For now Microsoft's tone was largely apologetic. In
it comments, "We have apologized for [the error]. We provided the Commission with a complete and candid assessment of the situation, and we have taken steps to strengthen our software development and other processes to help avoid this mistake - or anything similar - in the future."
Europa [EU press releases]
Reuters [Microsoft response]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Can We Stop?
3/6/2013 7:45:08 PM
Lol, they "accidentally" removed the ballot browser screen in SP1 and then it took them 13 months (?!?!) to put it back in because of "technical difficulties".
Sorry MS deserves this one. If a court mandates you do something then you do it. They were warned many times. They just took the p*ss ultimately and now they're paying for it.
RE: Can We Stop?
3/6/2013 7:48:28 PM
They should never have been forced to add it in the first place. I think they are being bullied.
RE: Can We Stop?
3/6/2013 8:28:42 PM
Regardless of the justification Microsoft needed to comply with the ruling and fight it out in court or however one challenges an EU ruling. 'Protesting' is never free and resulted in more financial loss.
It is just like if you are wronged by the police on the street, fighting it will only get you in more trouble. You just got to wait for your day of appointed 'justice' in court.
RE: Can We Stop?
3/7/2013 12:04:32 PM
I agree that Microsoft clearly let this slip and to take so long to put it back in was ridiculous. They deserve to be punished.
Having said that, $730M seems high for this type of fine. I couldn't find the EU calculations behind it. Also, does the money from this fine go to the EU, or does it all go to repair the harm Microsoft caused?
It seems like the EU and EU countries are going after large, global companies more to generate revenue rather than solely to enforce laws. It seems like they produce fines high enough to financially injure the company, but not enough to put it out of business. They wouldn't want to kill the goose that lays golden eggs after all.
"You can bet that Sony built a long-term business plan about being successful in Japan and that business plan is crumbling." -- Peter Moore, 24 hours before his Microsoft resignation
Report: EU Prepares to Surprise Microsoft With More Fines by End of March
March 1, 2013, 1:00 PM
EU to Microsoft on Browser Compliance: Prepare to be Punished
October 24, 2012, 12:38 PM
EU Chastises Microsoft's "Browser Ballot" Screen in Windows 7, More Fines Possible
July 17, 2012, 1:55 PM
EU Court Orders Microsoft to Pay up Most of Record Fine
June 28, 2012, 2:57 AM
Microsoft Releases Windows 7 Service Pack 1 to the Public
February 22, 2011, 4:02 PM
Surface 2 LTE Tipped for AT&T, Power Cover Available for Pre-order
March 12, 2014, 9:15 AM
HTC One Leaks: LED Smart Cover, Carrier Models, Google Play Ed.
March 11, 2014, 5:30 PM
New HTC One Camera Details Revealed via Leaked Ad
March 11, 2014, 9:20 AM
India Could Rock Google With Its Biggest Antitrust Fine Yet -- $5B USD
March 10, 2014, 8:12 PM
Apple Releases iOS 7.1, The First Major Update to Its "Rethought" Mobile OS
March 10, 2014, 1:52 PM
BlackBerry CEO Jokes that iPhone Users are "Wall Huggers"
March 10, 2014, 12:20 PM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Windows 8.1 Update 1 Leaked Early
March 7, 2014, 9:30 AM
Apple Won't Let UK Sons Unlock Their Deceased Mother's iPad
March 6, 2014, 12:44 PM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
Lt. Gen. Davis Says Next Gen USAF Bomber Will "Of Course" Surpass $550M/Unit
March 6, 2014, 9:45 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information