Military Contractors Take a Step Forward Towards Autonomous Killer Robot Swarm
March 5, 2013 4:10 PM
comment(s) - last by
Some top researchers say removing humans from the killing loop is a good idea
Is an age of autonomous
dawning? Some experts think so, and cheer that direction.
I. Killing Me Softly
Professor Ronald Arkin
Georgia Institute of Technology
argues killer robots are good news for mankind. He comments to
, "Everyone raises their arms and says, 'Oh, evil robots, oh, killer robots', [but] we have killer soldiers out there. Atrocities continue and they have continued since the beginning of warfare."
"We need to put technology to use to address the issues of reducing non-combatant casualties in the battle-space. [Via] the judicious application of ethical robotic systems can indeed accomplish that, if we are foolish enough as a nation, as a world, to persist in warfare."
Professor Ronald Arkin
The professor argues that by incorporating an "ethics switch" robots could autonomously kill, while respecting their masters and rules of combat. He explains his philosophy in his book "
Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots
Over 76 countries -- besides the U.S. -- are developing semi-autonomous armed robots, according to the U.S. Nations with drone programs include hostile states,
such as Iran
. Those nations are working to develop strike drones similar to those that the U.S.
uses to kill its citizens
believes they have become terrorists
II. Meet the Swarm
But today's drones may be far less deadly than those of tomorrow. Large and typically travelling alone, today's drones are deadly, but conspicuous. By contrast, roboticists
tomorrow's robotic attackers being smaller armed drones that attack as a swarm, neutralizing their fleshy rivals with deadly precision.
Defense contractor BAE Systems plc (
), a top weapons dealer to the U.S. and UK governments, is already working on a precursor to such a system. Collaborating with Professor Arkin's peer,
Professor Henrik Christensen
, they're making small cake-stand shaped bots endowed with swarm behavior.
One of the swarm robots by BAE and Georgia Tech [Image Source: BBC News]
The current plan is to have the robots map out a battlefield. Describes Professor Christensen, "These robots will basically spread out. They'll go through the environment and map out what it looks like, so that by the time you have humans entering the building you have a lot of intelligence about what's happening there."
But the robots could eventually be made armed and autonomous -- as Professor Arkin is hoping -- to form a deadly fighting force.
III. Ban Killer Robots?
in Washington, D.C. future warfare expert
Peter W. Singer
says that robots will be the next major step in the evolution of warfare. He comments, "Every so often in history, you get a technology that comes along that's a game changer. They're things like gunpowder, they're things like the machine gun, the atomic bomb, the computer… and robotics is one of those."
Some -- like
, a Nobel Prize-winning activist against anti-personnel landmines -- have turned their attention to pushing for a
global ban on autonomous killing machines
Indeed, recent military reports discuss the alarming science fiction scenario of
robotic soldiers "going rogue"
potentially occurring in real life, given the increasing robotization.
The U.S. military is worried about autonomous killer robots "going rogue".
[Image Source: TriStar Pictures]
But as nations like Iran race to develop new and more deadly robots of their own, and the U.S. yearns to continue to exert its hegemony worldwide, such pacifistic viewpoints may fall on deaf ears in Congress, and in other governing bodies worldwide. It appears less a question of whether autonomous killing robots will eventually arrive and more of a question of whether mankind will be able to keep his deadly machines under control.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
3/5/2013 6:31:41 PM
the development of this kind of technology but it's still sad that mankind is spending large amounts of money on this kind of thing. Empires, wars etc should be resigned to history where they belong. Back then, often, military power was power. Nowadays strong economies are power. Warfare is expensive, creates horrible suffering and is generally a complete waste of time and resources. Developing machines to make goods that we want and need at lower price points while raising overall quality; now that's where it's at! Not this shit imo.
3/5/2013 9:29:46 PM
The question becomes, what if a tyrant becomes the head of the economically powerful world government? Should an entire population suffer because a few people wish it, or should the population have the option to use force to remove the oppressors?
As much as we wish to rid ourselves of war, we must first rid the world of those who would wish to be above others in society along with those who wish to only survive and not take part in making society work. When the complacent become the majority, then the overbearing minority can easily take control.
3/6/2013 8:03:15 AM
True... I could try to argue that these robots are being developed for government use and not to help civilians protect their own freedoms and I could argue that some governments seem very trigger happy when it comes to starting wars, especially with countries much weaker than themselves and so how could making this considerably easier be a good thing? But... I don't think that's what you're arguing. I said it's a shame mankind is developing this kind of technology when we should all just compete with each other with our goods and services and raise the living standards of everyone. Your saying (I think) that the balance of power could shift for the worse if big businesses aren't controlled, if only through the fear of reprisal, and so there will always be a place for this kind of technology, useless we genetically engineer ourselves (mankind) one day not to be selfish and to always treat each other as equals. Basically, I agree with your point and concede that I was wrong but I still don't like governments, the way they operate currently, developing this kind of thing.
"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes
Former Press Secretary: Obama Admin. Tried to Conceal Drone Strikes on Americans
February 25, 2013, 2:01 PM
Secret DOJ Memo Suggests Drone Strikes May be Necessary to Kill American "Terrorists"
February 5, 2013, 1:55 PM
Human Rights Watch: Ban "Terminator" Robots Before We Lose Control
November 20, 2012, 5:30 PM
Iran Launches "Messenger of Death" Drone Bomber, Turns on Nuclear Reactor
August 23, 2010, 10:00 AM
New Navy-funded Report Warns of War Robots Going "Terminator"
February 17, 2009, 8:58 AM
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information