backtop


Print 44 comment(s) - last by Ammohunt.. on Mar 7 at 12:04 PM

Some top researchers say removing humans from the killing loop is a good idea

Is an age of autonomous killing machines dawning?  Some experts think so, and cheer that direction.

I. Killing Me Softly

Professor Ronald Arkin of the Georgia Institute of Technology argues killer robots are good news for mankind.  He comments to BBC News, "Everyone raises their arms and says, 'Oh, evil robots, oh, killer robots', [but] we have killer soldiers out there. Atrocities continue and they have continued since the beginning of warfare."

"We need to put technology to use to address the issues of reducing non-combatant casualties in the battle-space.  [Via] the judicious application of ethical robotic systems can indeed accomplish that, if we are foolish enough as a nation, as a world, to persist in warfare."

Professor Ronald Arkin
Professor Ronald Arkin

The professor argues that by incorporating an "ethics switch" robots could autonomously kill, while respecting their masters and rules of combat.  He explains his philosophy in his book "Governing Lethal Behavior in Autonomous Robots."

Over 76 countries -- besides the U.S. -- are developing semi-autonomous armed robots, according to the U.S.  Nations with drone programs include hostile states, such as Iran.  Those nations are working to develop strike drones similar to those that the U.S. uses to kill its citizens when it believes they have become terrorists.

II. Meet the Swarm

But today's drones may be far less deadly than those of tomorrow.  Large and typically travelling alone, today's drones are deadly, but conspicuous.  By contrast, roboticists envision tomorrow's robotic attackers being smaller armed drones that attack as a swarm, neutralizing their fleshy rivals with deadly precision.

Defense contractor BAE Systems plc (LON:BA), a top weapons dealer to the U.S. and UK governments, is already working on a precursor to such a system.  Collaborating with Professor Arkin's peer, Professor Henrik Christensen, they're making small cake-stand shaped bots endowed with swarm behavior.

BAE Robot
One of the swarm robots by BAE and Georgia Tech [Image Source: BBC News]

The current plan is to have the robots map out a battlefield.  Describes Professor Christensen, "These robots will basically spread out.  They'll go through the environment and map out what it looks like, so that by the time you have humans entering the building you have a lot of intelligence about what's happening there."

But the robots could eventually be made armed and autonomous -- as Professor Arkin is hoping -- to form a deadly fighting force.

III. Ban Killer Robots?

At the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. future warfare expert Peter W. Singer says that robots will be the next major step in the evolution of warfare.  He comments, "Every so often in history, you get a technology that comes along that's a game changer.  They're things like gunpowder, they're things like the machine gun, the atomic bomb, the computer… and robotics is one of those."

Some -- like Jody Williams, a Nobel Prize-winning activist against anti-personnel landmines -- have turned their attention to pushing for a global ban on autonomous killing machines.

Indeed, recent military reports discuss the alarming science fiction scenario of robotic soldiers "going rogue" potentially occurring in real life, given the increasing robotization.

Terminator wide
The U.S. military is worried about autonomous killer robots "going rogue".
[Image Source: TriStar Pictures]

But as nations like Iran race to develop new and more deadly robots of their own, and the U.S. yearns to continue to exert its hegemony worldwide, such pacifistic viewpoints may fall on deaf ears in Congress, and in other governing bodies worldwide.  It appears less a question of whether autonomous killing robots will eventually arrive and more of a question of whether mankind will be able to keep his deadly machines under control.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Wow
By Reclaimer77 on 3/5/2013 5:03:18 PM , Rating: 5
"I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here: it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step. You didn't earn the knowledge for yourselves, so you don't take any responsibility... for it. You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could and before you even knew what you had you patented it and packaged it and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now you're selling it, you want to sell it!

Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."


-Jurassic Park-


RE: Wow
By maugrimtr on 3/6/2013 8:38:04 AM , Rating: 2
Good quote but most people would be delighted for Science to run away and successfully clone a dinosaur.


RE: Wow
By Reclaimer77 on 3/6/2013 10:32:09 AM , Rating: 3
My point was not to be arbitrarily for or against something but to have a good open dialogue on the ethics of that something. The Goldblum speech just seemed, I don't know it just came to mind.


RE: Wow
By ShaolinSoccer on 3/6/2013 1:14:39 PM , Rating: 2
I feel sorry for any planet that ends up with a scientific civilization that worships science so much, they ignore any warnings and end up committing suicide on a planetary scale due to the accidental nature of science. Matter of fact, it's probably more common of a thing to happen in our universe considering how dangerous science becomes once you start to really mess with the laws of the universe. How can you possibly control something you don't totally understand?


RE: Wow
By marvdmartian on 3/6/2013 9:46:29 AM , Rating: 1
More like:
quote:
Sarah Connor: How are you supposed to know? Fucking men like you built the hydrogen bomb. Men like you thought it up. You think you're so creative. You don't know what it's like to really create something; to create a life; to feel it growing inside you. All you know how to create is death...
John Connor: Mom.
Sarah Connor: ...and destruction...
John Connor: Mom! We need to be a little more constructive here, okay?


My question is, what's to stop anyone with the technical know-how from creating their own? When the government decides it needs ultimate control, will we need robots to combat their robots??


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki