backtop


Print 47 comment(s) - last by 91TTZ.. on Mar 4 at 10:07 AM

Unrest boils at annual shareholder meeting, but things remain civil

Apple, Inc. (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook won reelection to Apple's Board of Directors by a 99.1 percent vote.  Apple is enjoying record profitability and is rumored to be working on a new project -- a smart watch.

I. Cook Acknowledges Disappointing Share Prices Amid Lawsuit

And yet share prices have been on a downward slide, dipping as "low" as $435 USD per share in recent weeks.  Some investors are worried that future Apple products won't be as big hits as the iPhone and iPad; others are angry that Apple is sitting on $137B USD in cash and securities, yet is failing to grow share buyback and dividends at an equivalent pace.

At the annual shareholder meeting, Tim Cook tried to placate his critics, arguing he was as mad as the next guy about low share prices.  He comments, "I don't like it either. The board doesn't like it. The management team doesn't like it.  What we are focused on is the long term. This has always been a secret of Apple."

Tim Cook
Tim Cook claims he shares shareholders pain about dropping stock prices.
[Image Source: Bloomberg]

Such a frank acknowledgement still sounds strange coming from Apple.  Mr. Cook's predecessor, the late Steve Jobs typically would refuse to apologize for anything.  By contrast, since taking the reins, Mr. Cook has been "all apologies" as the Nirvana song goes.

In a way that makes sense.  Mr. Cook himself was awarded one million restricted stock units last year (worth around $450M USD at current share prices); that fortune is hurt by low share prices, but could be boosted if share prices go back on the uphill climb.

However, top shareholder David Einhorn, who manages Greenlight Capital Re., Ltd. (GLRE), made a powerful statement by refusing to show up at the meeting.  Last Friday his firm scored an injunction invalidating a shareholder vote to scrap a proposal for Apple to issue preferred stock at its discretion.

Mr. Einhorn is pressuring Apple to "share the love", so to speak, by issuing preferred stock shares that would yield a fixed 4 percent annual dividend.  He claims his so-called "iPref" proposal would reward Apple's investors with more profit sharing, while not diluting the primary pool of shares.

II. Shareholders Stay Civil, But Send a Message to Apple

Shareholders flexed their muscle on other issues as well.  The shareholders ratified a proposal that would force Apple executives to hold more stock, which could push them to share more profit.  They also passed a measure that will force the company to commit a board committee on human rights, which will investigate allegations of abuse at the factories that make Apple products in China.  Apple opposed both proposals.

On the same note, Apple many shareholders voted against a pay raise for top executives, including Tim Cook.

California Public Employees Retirement System (CPERS), a large institutional Apple investor, voiced support for Mr. Einhorn's iPrefs proposal -- also known among shareholders as "Proposal 2".  Senior Portfolio Manager Anne Simpson said it was unfortunate that the issue was not put to a vote at the meeting.  She is quoted as saying, "We know there is hot debate going on with cash.  We are willing and happy to wait."

David Einhorn
Top Apple shareholder David Einhorn (manager of Greenlight Capital) is leading a push to force Apple to open up its treasure chest. [Image Source: Value Walk]

Tim Cook acknowledged the measure was being considered, while arguing that Mr. Einhorn's lawsuit to force the issue was a "silly sideshow".

While the mood was tense during the meeting, it remained mostly civil and there were moments of levity.  One shareholder pointed out that the Santa Clara, California Apple store lacked a bathroom.  Tim Cook agreed that was a problem and promised to look into it.

Sources: Reuters, Forbes



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Seriously
By TakinYourPoints on 3/1/2013 3:50:06 AM , Rating: 2
Pretty much. I go into some video card or case thread, dead zone. You figure people would love to talk about some cool PC parts but nope, hardly anything at all.

You go into a troll Apple, environment, or car thread and its all the same chuckleheads. Not a lot of tech talk from most of the DT usuals, mostly just fanboy cheerleading for cheap technology.

If it didn't get so many hits then you wouldn't see as many stories, simple. Websites run on ad revenue.


RE: Seriously
By TSS on 3/1/2013 5:46:32 AM , Rating: 5
well it's our own fault really. It is still a tech savvy website, how many of you are running ad blocker huh?

I've never run ad blocker in my life. Yet i haven't clicked on a single ad either, cause i know what type of ads there are and i avoid them like everybody else.

So they have to run on page hits, and tech articles simply get less page hits. Especially now that anandtech has it's "pipeline" articles handling all the technical stuff. To be truthfull, if anandtech took off the news ticker to DT at the side i'd stop coming here after a short while.

So that basically leaves social stuff. Economics, politics, venting etc. And that only because i've been coming here since the beginning so it's more of a habit.

Don't get me wrong, i miss the good old technical discussions that might've talked about the same things but atleast went deep into the info. I really miss Michael asher to counteract Jason's banter. Maybe jason's articles had piss poor quality atleast they dragged the best out of Masher.

Jason's improved in quality but not enough to replace masher yet. I definitly like the path he's taken lately with the more protest type of articles(keep it up it's amongst your best work), it's about time. But Tiffany's even worse then jason was when he started out, no point discussing the facts when the article's rewritten wrong and i have to continually look up the damn source article. if i wanted to do that, i'd never come here in the first place.

So DT's kinda caught in a twilight zone right now. Personally, i'd like to see the site turn itself around and revamp itself. Get a new layout (that's been the same since the start >5 years ago if you can belive it!), and make it a more "general news" type of site. Keep the tech section but make it part of many other sections.

It needs to be rebuilt around it's strongest part: the people who still discuss stuff here. Say what you want about hits and baiting discussion, there are still many discussions going on still with very good points and information, even if the topics are getting a bit stale.

I'd say this site could still be turned around if it's rebuilt and the articles rewritten to specifically engage the public more, rather then a simple rewrite and regurgitate newssite.

When that doesn't happen... well then the site will just wither and die like so many other sites. Probably at the point where anandtech decides the space for links on his site is better utilized for other things.


RE: Seriously
By NellyFromMA on 3/1/2013 1:14:40 PM , Rating: 2
Honestly, I only come here because I check Anand. I strongly wish Anand would repurpose the links, even for another - better - tech news site.

It's odd to go from Anand's very in-depth articles to these seemingly arguement-inducing articles where commenters become mortally offended by tech-enthusiasts engaging in any sort of intellectual discussion that strays from what the few trolls demand must be true when often its just cheerleading.

I like tech for tech. Microsoft doesn't get an auto-greenlight from me nor does Google Apple or anyone else. I have a preference based on my experience and your mileage may vary. So what.

Also, I wish taxes would go away. We'll see which happens first.


RE: Seriously
By TakinYourPoints on 3/1/2013 10:52:17 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Honestly, I only come here because I check Anand. I strongly wish Anand would repurpose the links, even for another - better - tech news site.


Same here. I've said it many times, its like The Economist running side columns by The National Enquirer. With a comment section seemingly sourced by Drudge Report. :/

quote:
It's odd to go from Anand's very in-depth articles to these seemingly arguement-inducing articles where commenters become mortally offended by tech-enthusiasts engaging in any sort of intellectual discussion that strays from what the few trolls demand must be true when often its just cheerleading.


Yes, and the difference is huge.

quote:
I like tech for tech. Microsoft doesn't get an auto-greenlight from me nor does Google Apple or anyone else. I have a preference based on my experience and your mileage may vary. So what.


Goddammit, absolutely 1000%, yes. I wish I had votes to give, +6 for this.


RE: Seriously
By Scrogneugneu on 3/1/2013 11:40:13 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Honestly, I only come here because I check Anand. I strongly wish Anand would repurpose the links, even for another - better - tech news site.


Amen.

I sometimes wonder if I can tell who comes from AT and who comes straight for DT, just by looking at the depth of the comments.


RE: Seriously
By TakinYourPoints on 3/1/2013 10:56:54 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Especially now that anandtech has it's "pipeline" articles handling all the technical stuff.


That started long after DT settled into tabloid trolling for cheap hits. I believe AT started Pipeline to fill a gap in technical news that DT wasn't fulfilling.

quote:
To be truthfull, if anandtech took off the news ticker to DT at the side i'd stop coming here after a short while.


No question.


RE: Seriously
By retrospooty on 3/1/2013 8:57:03 AM , Rating: 5
"all the same chuckleheads"

Sounds funny coming from one of the primary chuckleheads. ;)


RE: Seriously
By TakinYourPoints on 3/1/2013 10:54:09 PM , Rating: 2
http://xkcd.com/386/

Yup, guilty, but someone has to tell mindless cheerleading trolls why they're wrong! ;)

I so wish this place wasn't on the Anandtech sidebar, haha


RE: Seriously
By retrospooty on 3/1/2013 11:50:00 PM , Rating: 2
Me too. It's addicting, and i kind of feel guilty about it...
Anandtech has been my start page for 14 years. Damn. Its been there from Netscape Navigator, to Communicator, to IE, to Opera to Firefox and now Chrome... but if Dailytech were gone from Anandtech, I wouldnt see, nor care to check anything at dailytech at all.


RE: Seriously
By Reclaimer77 on 3/1/2013 4:15:19 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Pretty much. I go into some video card or case thread, dead zone. You figure people would love to talk about some cool PC parts but nope, hardly anything at all.


Well honestly, when is the last time a new video card or case actually interested you? I think the last big "WoW" in video cards was, what, the 9700 Pro? I mean something that wasn't just an iteration of last week's thing, with a bit more FPS or throughput.

We're jaded, completely.

quote:
You go into a troll Apple, environment, or car thread and its all the same chuckleheads.


*Sniff* hmmm.. *sniff* yup, picking up a strong scent of butthurt here.

Now go do what you do best, and fill us in on the latest Apple stock analysis and profit reports. Cause you and Tony constantly going there is REALLY awesome stuff in a tech discussion. Nothing gets the motor revving like finances, am I right?


RE: Seriously
By TakinYourPoints on 3/1/2013 10:47:01 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Well honestly, when is the last time a new video card or case actually interested you? I think the last big "WoW" in video cards was, what, the 9700 Pro? I mean something that wasn't just an iteration of last week's thing, with a bit more FPS or throughput.

We're jaded, completely.


You're jaded, I'm still totally into all this stuff.

quote:
*Sniff* hmmm.. *sniff* yup, picking up a strong scent of butthurt here.


Not at all, its just funny how so many people here are all about the drama rather than things that actually matter. You practically thrive on it, but maybe its the Italian part of you that needs it, idk. ;)


RE: Seriously
By xti on 3/2/2013 11:46:40 AM , Rating: 2
its a really biased tech site...you wanted actual sensible people?...pretty much any other website would get you that.


RE: Seriously
By Reclaimer77 on 3/3/2013 8:39:45 AM , Rating: 2
Takin is the like the kid who enjoys horseplay with the rest of them, then when an adult shows up goes "hey you guys, come on, don't do that stuff".

I mean he engages in this stuff routinely, then criticized DT for it lol.

I actually like the guy a lot though. He's one of the reasons people keep coming back. Daily Tech has great characters :)


RE: Seriously
By TakinYourPoints on 3/4/2013 9:42:14 AM , Rating: 2
All comes down to this: http://xkcd.com/386/

And yes, it is a COLOSSAL waste of time correcting random strangers when they're wrong. ;)

*kisses*


"We’re Apple. We don’t wear suits. We don’t even own suits." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki