backtop


Print 70 comment(s) - last by Creig.. on Feb 28 at 2:35 PM

Those who wish to avoid system should quit Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, or Time Warner service

After months of delays, a "six strikes" system designed to curb copyright infringement will go live in the United States, affecting customers on many of the nations' top internet service providers (ISPs).  While avoiding the most draconian of punishments proposed in past plans -- severing offenders' internet connections -- the system will carry serious consequences including connection throttling and forced "education" from anti-piracy groups.

The nation's top two mobile carriers -- Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ)/Vodafone Group Plc. (LON:VOD) joint subsidiary Verizon Wireless and AT&T, Inc. (T) -- are both participating (as is Verizon Communications’ cable network).  Also onboard is top cable internet provider Comcast Corp. (CMCSA), a company that knows a thing or two about throttling.  Rounding out the early adopters is Time Warner Cable, Inc. (TWC), a company known for its tireless efforts to stomp out municipal cable.  The group, along with its big media partners, is known as the Center for Copyright Information.

The Daily Dot was the first to report that the system would go online this week.  The system had been delayed for months due to issues with testing servers getting knocked offline by Hurricane Sandy.

The CCI's so-called Copyright Alert System (CAS) just had a shiny new website and promotion video pop up on YouTube, lending credence to the report that the system will be deployed next week.


CCI Website
CCI's new website just went live.

Under the plan, copyright watchdogs like the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) -- groups that have been internationally involved in convictions or settlements involving their own "theft" of independent artists' work -- will join peer-to-peer networks or BitTorrent transfers and log internet protocol (IP) addresses of people who are downloading "confirmed infringed content".

The first warning carries no action, but later warnings carry ISP-specific "Mitigation actions".  The (sort of) good news is that there is a path to appeal warnings.  Writes the CCI:

There is a $35 filing fee, which may be waived if you meet affordability criteria. The fee will be refunded if your challenge is successful.

Still, the system is a concern for real estate owners and Wi-Fi cafe owners, in that their services could be limited due to their customers’ actions.  In many cases, it would be near impossible for such entities to police their customers’ actions.

The simple solution for business people in that situation is to cancel their service with AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, or Time Warner and seek a local alternative.  

Of course that approach could be difficult in some regions, and may become infeasible if more ISPs jump on the CCI bandwagon.  For now, though, there are alternatives for many customers who want to avoid the system.

Source: Daily Dot



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: My alternatives are Comcast or Verizon FiOS
By Jeffk464 on 2/25/2013 2:20:49 PM , Rating: 2
Yup, nothing media has ever done has been able to stop the major pirates who actually distribute and profit from pirated movies and software. The vast majority of piracy for profit is going on in other countries.


RE: My alternatives are Comcast or Verizon FiOS
By NellyFromMA on 2/25/2013 4:24:07 PM , Rating: 2
The industry truly doesn't discriminate against for-profit piracy and not-for-profit piracy.

Piracy at all is lost revenue for them.


RE: My alternatives are Comcast or Verizon FiOS
By christojojo on 2/25/2013 10:17:33 PM , Rating: 2
Yes along with the worst kind of pirate they face the imaginary lost profit from poor people profit. You know the ones that wouldnt buy it anyways they would just wait for it to be on tv the fast forward through the commercials. I always love the creative "we lost X many dollars due to this" mentality. Yet they never pay the stars for lost profit.


RE: My alternatives are Comcast or Verizon FiOS
By NellyFromMA on 2/26/2013 1:19:13 PM , Rating: 2
So they should just get it all for free while the working class pay? That mentality is a tough sale on all the non-dependants that continue to be squeezed for every cent possible because the rich and the poor want it all.

It seems like its a more creative idea to get the working class to always pay for everyone elses's LUXURIES, not necessitties.

Just why are 'poor people' as you refer to them entitled to everything I have to earn?


By Unspoken Thought on 2/27/2013 6:40:33 PM , Rating: 2
Well, just because I exist shouldn't entitle you to subsidize all of your financial burdens on me either.

If they raise the price on a product you desire due to low sales, you aren't going to get anywhere running around yelling at the poor people claiming it's their fault.


"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki