Supreme Court to Rule on Whether Breast Cancer Genes, Plants are Patentable
February 19, 2013 3:07 PM
comment(s) - last by
Monsanto and Myriad are hopeful that the nation's highest court
20 percent of the human genome
is patented. Thousands of genetically modified plants and animals are patented as well. But those patents could soon be invalidated, depending on how the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rules in a pair of key cases it will hear later this year.
I. Myriad and Patenting the Human Genome
The first case shaking the biotechnology agency is a lawsuit
Association for Molecular Pathology
Public Patent Foundation
(PUBPAT), and the
American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) against Myriad Genetics, Inc. (
) and the
University of Utah Research Foundation
Myriad and the University of Utah had patented a pair of genes -- BRCA1 and BRCA2 -- which are associated with breast cancer. They, and other human gene patent holders claim that isolating human genes makes them patentable, despite the same gene appearing in nature. They feel that their patents entitle them to block research on the human genes, unless various companies and research institutions pay their fees.
Myriad "owns" two critical human genes involved with breast cancer.
[Image Source: AU-KBC RESEARCH CENTRE]
Critics say this approach is unethical and immoral. They also argue that it illegal under provisions that "human organisms" [
] and "laws of nature" [
] are not patentable.
Judge Robert W. Sweet
, a federal judge with the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
, sided with the plaintiff's argument,
ruling that human gene patents were invalid
Now SCOTUS must decide whether to toss that decision, preserving the thousands of gene patents, or uphold it, throwing the biotech industry into chaos.
Oral arguments in the case
II. Monsanto and Second Generation GMO Seed
The other significant case involves a 75-year-old southwestern Indianan farmer's case
genetically modified organism (GMO) crop lines
. Lawyers for Vernon Hugh Bowman argue that companies like Monsanto should not be able to stake ownership to the offspring of GMO crops capable of reproduction.
Monsanto argues that ruling second-generation crops patent-free would "devastate innovation in biotechnology", commenting, "Investors are unlikely to make such investments if they cannot prevent purchasers of living organisms containing their invention from using them to produce unlimited copies."
One acre of GMO soybeans can produce enough beans to seed 26 acres of crop. In other words if the SCOTUS sides with Mr. Bowman, GMO seeds may be a one-time purchase for careful farmers.
Farmers are upset about Monsanto's lawsuits. [Image Source; AP/Greenpeace]
Currently, Monsanto requires farmers to sign contracts not to save seeds. It has filed 140 patent lawsuits against 410 farmers and 56 small farm businesses, according to The Center for Food Safety. While most of the cases were settled out of court, Monsanto scooped up $23.67M USD in judgements from the farmers who did try to fight it in court.
Mr. Bowman's case revolves around Roundup, a popular pesticide used on 90 percent of soybean crops in the U.S. Monsanto produced a special patented breed of soybean dubbed "Roundup Ready", which is immune to the herbicide.
Traditionally Mr. Bowman paid for a preliminary order of Roundup Ready soybean seeds each year. But for his second crop he bought commodity soybeans from a local grain elevator, as that crop is more often prone to fail and Monsanto's seed is expensive. The elevator grain consists of a blend of soybeans, most of which are Monsanto-derived crops. Mr. Bowman argues he should not be held accountable for using that crop.
In 2007 Monsanto sued Mr. Bowman and in 2009 the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Mr. Bowman to pay $84,000 USD in damages. That decision
[PDF] in 2010 by the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
III. Monsanto Case Takes Different Angle: Patent Exhaustion
Unlike the Myriad case, the Monsanto case does not look to directly challenge the patentability of GMOs. Rather, it argues that GMO crops should be eligible for patent exhaustion -- once [their seeds] are sold, the patent should no longer apply, they argue.
Mr. Bowman has done much of the research for the case himself on a library loaned computer (as he does not own a PC). He is represented by
Mark P. Walters
of the firm Frommer Lawrence & Haug, which took the case on pro bono. Despite the firm offering its services pro bono, Mr. Bowman has still been forced to pay over $31,000 in legal fees.
Vernon H. Bowman [Image Source: Aaron P. Bernstein for The New York Times]
The New York Times
, he states, "I was prepared to let them run over me. but I wasn’t getting out of the road."
A date for the arguments has not been set.
Admittedly the cases are very different in several ways, but cumulatively they should prove a critical test of whether companies can reliably (and legally) patent living organisms.
The New York Times
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
2/19/2013 7:24:53 PM
The funny thing is I know two farming families who think Monsanto is the best thing to farmers since the plow. I'm not saying Monsanto is an upright respectable company, but it is my opinion, talking to the farmers I know, that Monsanto isn't as bad as their reputation states. As the saying goes, there are three sides to every story: What he says, what she says, and what really happened.
Personally I hope the Supreme Court invalidates patents on genetics. There needs to be another way to compensate and thus encourage companies to do genetic research. I think patenting the building blocks of life is fundamentally wrong. Where will it end?
2/20/2013 7:13:33 AM
Are your friends from India?
The third side to this story drank insecticide in his own barren field.
2/20/2013 7:43:31 AM
Monsanto is not so bad if you're in bed with them, they make plants that are more resistant to plagues and hence the farmer using them doesn't need to spray as many chemicals on their crops as everyone else, this is a good thing, it only turns bad when you realize your plants don't live in a contained space and that you are also contaminating the plants nearby (actually it could be kms away), and it turns even worst when Monsanto actively goes after your neighbor cause he was unlucky enough to be a neighbor of someone using OGM crops.
The least Monsanto could do is to offer the neighbors at a FRAND price new seeds (OGM free) each year in a way that they will not use the OGM contaminated seeds from last year.
There are three sides of the story but not the ones you point, there are the farmers that happily use Monsanto seeds, the ones who chose to not use them and the others who don't care about it, the last two are the ones that will eventually get Monsanto knocking on their doors claiming they are using seeds with their patented genes.
"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton
AntiSec Exposes U.S. Soldiers' S/Ns, Passwords, Vows Attack on Monsanto
July 12, 2011, 8:45 AM
U.S. Farmers Realize Disadvantages of Genetically Engineered Seed
October 5, 2010, 3:41 PM
Federal Court Rules it is Illegal to Patent Unaltered Human Genes
April 1, 2010, 12:00 PM
Twenty Percent of Human Genome is Patented, ACLU Battle to Determine Legality
January 22, 2010, 9:20 AM
EQ-Radio: A New Device for Wirelessly Detecting Emotions
September 26, 2016, 5:00 AM
Are you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
FDA Cleared, Shockwave Lithoplasty for Peripheral Vascular Disease
September 22, 2016, 5:45 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM
Most Popular Articles
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
First Self-Driving Car debut on the streets of Singapore
Aug 28, 2016, 4:10 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information