Supreme Court to Rule on Whether Breast Cancer Genes, Plants are Patentable
February 19, 2013 3:07 PM
comment(s) - last by
Monsanto and Myriad are hopeful that the nation's highest court
20 percent of the human genome
is patented. Thousands of genetically modified plants and animals are patented as well. But those patents could soon be invalidated, depending on how the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rules in a pair of key cases it will hear later this year.
I. Myriad and Patenting the Human Genome
The first case shaking the biotechnology agency is a lawsuit
Association for Molecular Pathology
Public Patent Foundation
(PUBPAT), and the
American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) against Myriad Genetics, Inc. (
) and the
University of Utah Research Foundation
Myriad and the University of Utah had patented a pair of genes -- BRCA1 and BRCA2 -- which are associated with breast cancer. They, and other human gene patent holders claim that isolating human genes makes them patentable, despite the same gene appearing in nature. They feel that their patents entitle them to block research on the human genes, unless various companies and research institutions pay their fees.
Myriad "owns" two critical human genes involved with breast cancer.
[Image Source: AU-KBC RESEARCH CENTRE]
Critics say this approach is unethical and immoral. They also argue that it illegal under provisions that "human organisms" [
] and "laws of nature" [
] are not patentable.
Judge Robert W. Sweet
, a federal judge with the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
, sided with the plaintiff's argument,
ruling that human gene patents were invalid
Now SCOTUS must decide whether to toss that decision, preserving the thousands of gene patents, or uphold it, throwing the biotech industry into chaos.
Oral arguments in the case
II. Monsanto and Second Generation GMO Seed
The other significant case involves a 75-year-old southwestern Indianan farmer's case
genetically modified organism (GMO) crop lines
. Lawyers for Vernon Hugh Bowman argue that companies like Monsanto should not be able to stake ownership to the offspring of GMO crops capable of reproduction.
Monsanto argues that ruling second-generation crops patent-free would "devastate innovation in biotechnology", commenting, "Investors are unlikely to make such investments if they cannot prevent purchasers of living organisms containing their invention from using them to produce unlimited copies."
One acre of GMO soybeans can produce enough beans to seed 26 acres of crop. In other words if the SCOTUS sides with Mr. Bowman, GMO seeds may be a one-time purchase for careful farmers.
Farmers are upset about Monsanto's lawsuits. [Image Source; AP/Greenpeace]
Currently, Monsanto requires farmers to sign contracts not to save seeds. It has filed 140 patent lawsuits against 410 farmers and 56 small farm businesses, according to The Center for Food Safety. While most of the cases were settled out of court, Monsanto scooped up $23.67M USD in judgements from the farmers who did try to fight it in court.
Mr. Bowman's case revolves around Roundup, a popular pesticide used on 90 percent of soybean crops in the U.S. Monsanto produced a special patented breed of soybean dubbed "Roundup Ready", which is immune to the herbicide.
Traditionally Mr. Bowman paid for a preliminary order of Roundup Ready soybean seeds each year. But for his second crop he bought commodity soybeans from a local grain elevator, as that crop is more often prone to fail and Monsanto's seed is expensive. The elevator grain consists of a blend of soybeans, most of which are Monsanto-derived crops. Mr. Bowman argues he should not be held accountable for using that crop.
In 2007 Monsanto sued Mr. Bowman and in 2009 the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Mr. Bowman to pay $84,000 USD in damages. That decision
[PDF] in 2010 by the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
III. Monsanto Case Takes Different Angle: Patent Exhaustion
Unlike the Myriad case, the Monsanto case does not look to directly challenge the patentability of GMOs. Rather, it argues that GMO crops should be eligible for patent exhaustion -- once [their seeds] are sold, the patent should no longer apply, they argue.
Mr. Bowman has done much of the research for the case himself on a library loaned computer (as he does not own a PC). He is represented by
Mark P. Walters
of the firm Frommer Lawrence & Haug, which took the case on pro bono. Despite the firm offering its services pro bono, Mr. Bowman has still been forced to pay over $31,000 in legal fees.
Vernon H. Bowman [Image Source: Aaron P. Bernstein for The New York Times]
The New York Times
, he states, "I was prepared to let them run over me. but I wasn’t getting out of the road."
A date for the arguments has not been set.
Admittedly the cases are very different in several ways, but cumulatively they should prove a critical test of whether companies can reliably (and legally) patent living organisms.
The New York Times
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
2/19/2013 4:36:49 PM
Nah, they're going to sue everyone for
new BRCA genes when they reproduce and for
BRCA genes to repair DNA in everyday life.
2/20/2013 3:13:26 PM
I don't have a problem with it if they apply a common-sense rule: With ownership comes responsibility. If I "own" a gene which causes breast cancer, then I am financially responsible for all the harm that comes from breast cancer. If I "own" a gene which causes plants to be resistant to Round-Up, then I am financially responsible for all the harm it causes (e.g. it infects fields of orgranic crops trying to remain GMO-free).
You cannot reap the benefits of the good from owning something, while simultaneously disavowing yourself from any harm which originates from that same something.
2/20/2013 4:48:05 PM
I would agree. The issues I see with patented genetics, GMOs, and even nano technology is that everyone wants profit without consideration for the cost. For nano tech, one of the first questions that occurred to me was, "Okay, so what happens to all of these particles in our environment and more specifically, within us?" It wasn't too long before some studies were published indicating that, indeed, nano particles were accumulating or becoming lodged in tissue and cells. Needless to say, this is not a good thing if there is no complementary technology for insuring safety and or "harvesting" of what is put out into the world. With GMO crops we still have an uncertain future with them as some have been highly problematic (read: toxic) and, as noted, we run the risk of these unpredictable genetics being spread to non-GMO plants. With all of that said, if this sort of stuff gets the green light from the Supreme Corp., um, I mean Supreme Court, we'll be on our way to a Blade Runner future where everything will be owned by some corporation. Meh.
"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes
AntiSec Exposes U.S. Soldiers' S/Ns, Passwords, Vows Attack on Monsanto
July 12, 2011, 8:45 AM
U.S. Farmers Realize Disadvantages of Genetically Engineered Seed
October 5, 2010, 3:41 PM
Federal Court Rules it is Illegal to Patent Unaltered Human Genes
April 1, 2010, 12:00 PM
Twenty Percent of Human Genome is Patented, ACLU Battle to Determine Legality
January 22, 2010, 9:20 AM
Obama Admin Looks to Revive Bill for Greater Media Protection in Wake of AP Controversy
May 16, 2013, 1:47 PM
Notre Dame Designs Camera to Detect Age of Bruise for Abuse Checks
May 16, 2013, 9:05 AM
Report: Climate Change Could Wash Away Historic Jamestown Site Within 100 Years
May 15, 2013, 5:39 PM
U.S. Navy Launches First Unmanned X-47B Aircraft from Carrier Flight Deck
May 15, 2013, 12:13 PM
Government Creates Global Warming "Refugee" Crisis in Alaska
May 15, 2013, 6:37 AM
Quick Note: ISS Astronaut Records David Bowie Cover from Space
May 13, 2013, 1:01 PM
Most Popular Articles
Report: Microsoft Eyes Return to "Dying" Windows 7 Path After Windows 8 Flop
May 13, 2013, 9:50 AM
Bill Gates Gets Teary-Eyed While Discussing Steve Jobs, Shows Off Life-Saving Tech on 60 Minutes
May 13, 2013, 12:30 PM
Windows 8.1 Will Be Free; Microsoft Holds Onto Struggling ARM Variant
May 14, 2013, 2:57 PM
Google Announces "Pure" Galaxy Nexus S4 for $649, Android Updates
May 15, 2013, 1:42 PM
U.S. Federal Traffic Board Wants to Make Drunk Driving Threshold Far Harsher
May 15, 2013, 11:32 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Parents of Pre-Teen Drivers Commonly Practice Distracted Driving Says Study
May 9, 2013, 7:16 AM
Apple's iOS 7 Running Into Internal Delays Due to Massive Overhaul
May 1, 2013, 4:26 PM
Elon Musk Willing to Spend More Money on Widening of 405 Freeway
Apr 26, 2013, 7:28 PM
New $100 Bill Due in October
Apr 24, 2013, 11:52 PM
Volkswagen Shows off iBeetle in Shanghai
Apr 22, 2013, 9:29 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information