backtop


Print 47 comment(s) - last by Xplorer4x4.. on Feb 19 at 7:09 PM

Microsoft makes Office 2013 licensing much more restrictive

Microsoft has certainly made its share of strange moves over the years when it comes to software licensing. However, the company has again raised the ire of its customers with a change in retail licensing agreement for Office 2013. Microsoft confirmed this week that Office 2013 will be permanently tied to the first computer on which it is installed.

Not only does that mean you will be unable to uninstall the software on your computer and reinstall on a new computer, it also means if you computer crashes and is unrecoverable you'll be buying a new license for Windows 2013.
 
This move is a change from past licensing agreements with older versions of Office, and many believe that this move is a way for Microsoft to push consumers to its subscription Office plans.


"That's a substantial shift in Microsoft licensing," said Daryl Ullman, co-founder and managing director of the Emerset Consulting Group, which specializes in helping companies negotiate software licensing deals. "Let's be frank. This is not in the consumer's best interest. They're paying more than before, because they're not getting the same benefits as before."

Prior to Office 2013, Microsoft's end-user license agreement for retail copies of Office allowed the owner to reassign the license to a different device any number of times as long as that reassignment didn't happen more than once every 90 days. The Office 2013 EULA changes past verbiage stating, "Our software license is permanently assigned to the licensed computer."

When Computer World asked Microsoft if customers can move Word and its license to replacement PC if the original PC was lost, stolen, or destroyed Microsoft only replied "no comment."

Source: Computer World



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Obvious attempt to push subscription model
By tayb on 2/18/2013 9:57:54 AM , Rating: 2
This is an obvious attempt to push the Office 365 subscription model. Unfortunately $99 a year is a ripoff and idiotic licensing terms for desktop software isn't going to change that.

Google Docs is free and online. LibreOffice is free. OpenOffice is free.

Someone needs to slap some sense into Microsoft.




By Netscorer on 2/18/2013 11:08:43 AM , Rating: 2
$100 a year is not a rip-off if you count all the goodies MS throws in the package. Free Sky Drive storage, 60 mins of Skype per month, 5 stand-alone installations of MS Office and other benefits. The problem is this is like a premium cable TV - it all sounds enticing but then you realize that you are not going to use most of it, so why pay full price? In TV business there are multiple tiers, so people have choice. What MS should do is present this choice for home users. If I don't want 5 stand-alone copies of MS Office and I don't use Skype and I already have plenty of free cloud storage from alternative providers, would I get a discount? Until MS can answer yes to this question, I will not sign up for Office 365.


"So, I think the same thing of the music industry. They can't say that they're losing money, you know what I'm saying. They just probably don't have the same surplus that they had." -- Wu-Tang Clan founder RZA

Related Articles
Office 365 Launches Today for $100/Year
January 29, 2013, 3:58 PM













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki