Print 39 comment(s) - last by MarthaGray22.. on Feb 17 at 9:30 PM

Order has been anticipated for some time now

President Barack Obama (D) has been widely criticized by conservatives for his use of executive orders to push the federal actions he wants when Congress is unwilling to go along with him.  The tactic isn't exactly new (FDR signed nearly 4,500 executive orders) and President Obama hasn't used it all that often (he's signed 144) [source].  But his critics contend his executive orders are more sweeping and loaded with action than past ones, so the small count is misleading.

I. Some Critics Say the Order Goes Too Far...

That criticism may be revived this week if President Obama drops his long-awaited cyberwarfare executive order.

Reuters spoke with government officials who had seen the order and said it is expected for a Wednesday drop.  The order is expected to expand the role the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) plays in policing the homeland online from both internal and external threats.
Obama speaking
President Obama wants to expand the federal gov't to "solve" the cybersecurity "crisis".
[Image Source: U.S. Aid]

The expansion of DHS authority alone is enough to make many a bit queasy.  Under President Bush, the new intelligence agency was a key point of controversy from his Democratic and third party critics.

Some Republicans even opposed the DHS under both Bush and Obama, although they're a drastic minority in Congress.  Perhaps most notable is Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) who has suggested that the Department of Homeland Security is poor in talent, offensive to civil liberties, and redundant, commenting [source]:

Before 9/11, we were spending $40 billion a year, and the FBI was producing numerous information about people being trained on airplanes, to fly them but not land them. And they totally ignored them. So it’s the inefficiency of the bureaucracy that is the problem. So, increasing this with the Department of Homeland Security and spending more money doesn’t absolve us of the problem. Yes, we have every right in the world to know something about intelligence gathering. But we have to have intelligent people interpreting this information.

But like it or not, Ron Paul and his supporters on the left and right may be unable to stop President Obama from pushing through the plan.

II. ...Others Complain It's Too Weak

One thing that will make it difficult to rally Congressional opposition to the order is that the order itself is actually relatively similar to the bills put forth by bipartisan committees in both the House and Senate last year.

In reality, most Congressional Democrats and Republicans agreed that some sort of increase in cyberdefense spending and more codified framework for public-private sharing of information on threats was necessary.  Both plans involved incorporating the DHS into those roles.  So on the surface at least the pending executive order does not sound all that different from what either the House or Senate had agreed upon.

Ultimately, neither bill passed last year, thanks largely to partisan bickering.  While the House bill and Senate bill were remarkably similar, the Republican controlled house insisted on its version being passed, while the Democratic controlled Senate demanded its bill be the final version.  Ultimately that gridlock sunk both bills, when a series of small changes would likely have been enough to reconcile the differences between the two bills.
Congress Buillding wide
Despite drafting nearly identical bills last year, the House and Senate were not able to reach agreement, due largely to partisan bickering. [Image Source: U.S. Congress]
The U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is among the cyberdefense agencies frustrated by that bureaucratic train wreck.  But officials to acknowledge that it won't be easy convincing the private sector to trust federal security.

Comments FBI Executive Assistant Director Richard McFeely, head of the Criminal, Cyber, Response and Services Branch, "Our biggest issue right now is getting the private sector to a comfort level so they can report anomalies, malware, incidents within their network [without them fearing media leaks]."

Reportedly the information sharing portions of the order will be voluntary for most businesses.  

Indeed, despite the controversy over what the order does do, there's also some concern/criticism about how much it doesn't get done.  Comments one source to Reuters -- "We know the executive order isn't going to go as far as legislation could or will go, but it's a good start."

Stewart Baker, former National Security Agency (NSA) general counsel and a past assistant secretary for policy at the DHS comments, "I think this can fairly be described as a down payment on legislation.  [It should do something positive], but whether it will provide practical protection from cyber attacks is still in doubt."

Source: Reuters

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By SAN-Man on 2/12/2013 4:34:04 PM , Rating: 2
He's as bad as Mr. Bush, probably worse. At least you knew what you were getting with Mr. Bush. Mr. Obama says one thing, does another - all while smiling at you.

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By roykahn on 2/12/2013 7:09:05 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, and he doesn't even need a saxophone to woo you!

I found a useful web site that examines his broken promises.

I'll just pluck one from page 3:
...a "periodic review" process for long-held Guantanamo detainees who have not been charged, convicted or designated for transfer, "but must continue to be detained because they 'in effect, remain at war with the United States,'"

Isn't that a lovely way to break one's promise? Just label someone as being at war with you and you can do whatever you want with them!

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By Reclaimer77 on 2/12/2013 7:21:13 PM , Rating: 2
Oh is that when he claimed he was going to close Guantanamo and hold public trials for all detainees in New freaking York city?

I guess that sounded good to the idiot monkeys who comprise our voting base, but someone in his Administration must have made him realize how totally fucking insane that would have been.

New drinking game! Watch his speech tonight and take a shot every time he outlines some failed fucking socialist game plan that didn't work the first time he tried it.

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By roykahn on 2/12/2013 7:32:06 PM , Rating: 2
Does this web site have a hidden functionality that automatically deducts one point from your comments? :)

Seriously though, it's hard to judge whether any of his "promises" are sincere. He IS a politician and votes are like gold coins that must be collected in any possible way. Freshly re-elected and secured for a few more years, just watch how the disgusting political acts and rhetoric get rolled out.

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By Reclaimer77 on 2/12/2013 7:38:14 PM , Rating: 2
Nah you get a deduction if you curse. Because 18'th century speech code policies totally jive with a "tech" website :)

But I get a voted down a lot because, well, people are sheep and there's safety in group-think.

just watch how the disgusting political acts and rhetoric get rolled out.

ugh, aye. It's the longest 4 years, again.

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By thurston2 on 2/12/2013 9:27:57 PM , Rating: 4
You get voted down a lot because you're a dickhead.

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By roykahn on 2/13/2013 8:57:03 PM , Rating: 2
Funny, isn't it? Your curse word resulted in an up-vote.

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By room200 on 2/12/2013 8:01:52 PM , Rating: 2
Ummm, warning. Those are most of the promises that liberals are pissed at him for. I can seem Reclaimer77 reading them and jumping for joy that he broke THOSE promises. LOL

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By Reclaimer77 on 2/12/2013 8:06:30 PM , Rating: 2
Liberals "pissed" at Obama? No such animal really.

RE: Obama is a Hypocrite
By room200 on 2/13/2013 11:49:34 PM , Rating: 2
You know nothing about liberals except what Faux News has told you.

"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki