backtop


Print 45 comment(s) - last by lexluthermiest.. on Feb 16 at 2:41 AM

Software was pitched to the U.S. government, but not yet sold

Raytheon Comp. (RTN) has created a social networking tracking program called Rapid Information Overlay Technology -- or "RIOT", for short -- which is building a database of trillions of pieces of data on millions of users' social networking profiles.  The software digs into the usual suspects -- Facebook, Inc.'s (FB) ubiquitous social network, popular microblogging site Twitter, and FourSquare, whose location-aware apps boast 25 million users.

I. RIOT is Watching You

The idea of RIOT is to allow government agents to in a click or two examine both your behavior history, and more interestingly (or alarmingly) predict your potential future actions.

Today, mobile client use has finally overtaken desktop use for Facebook, the world's largest network.  But hidden in most mobile posts by Facebook's over 1 billion users is an information is an "exif" information tag, a special string that identifies the latitude and longitude the user posted from.  By mining exif data publicly available posts (or alternatively creating Facebook softbots to friend users and lure them into RIOT's circle of friendship), RIOT is capable of tracking citizens' daily movements.

In a video, Brian Urch, principle investigator on the RIOT project at Raytheon describes, "We're going to track one of our own employees."


By mining the publicly available information, the demo shows how the client determined that "Nick" commonly frequents Washington Nationals Park.  It even shows off a photo of a blonde whom Nick posed with at the park.

But RIOT's most powerful capability is trying to analyze the future.  Its spidery webs of information spread out, assessing the trends in Nick's behaviors.  It makes a discovery --  Nick goes to the gym each day at 6 a.m.

Mr Urch comments, "... So if you ever did want to try to get hold of Nick, or maybe get hold of his laptop, you might want to visit the gym at 6am on a Monday."

He encourages users with questions to shoot him an email at brian.urch@raytheon.com.

II. Raytheon Fights to Keep Video Demo Secret

The video was never meant to be seen by the eyes of the public.  Raytheon asked Guardian, the top UK newspaper who obtained the video, not to post it.  Comments Raytheon's spokesperson:

Riot is a big data analytics system design we are working on with industry, national labs and commercial partners to help turn massive amounts of data into useable information to help meet our nation's rapidly changing security needs.

Its innovative privacy features are the most robust that we're aware of, enabling the sharing and analysis of data without personally identifiable information [such as social security numbers, bank or other financial account information] being disclosed.

But Raytheon's argument that the product was "proof of concept" was not enough to convince Guardian not to post the video.  But even before the video, clues about RIOT were leaking out.  A patent application filed by Raytheon in December -- -- contained details relating to the data mining technology in the software.

Watchful eye
[Image Source: Alex's Archives]

In an interview with Guardian, Ginger McCall, an attorney at the Washington, D.C.-based Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), complains, "Social networking sites are often not transparent about what information is shared and how it is shared.  Users may be posting information that they believe will be viewed only by their friends, but instead, it is being viewed by government officials or pulled in by data collection services like the Riot search."

III. RIOT is Even Better at Playing Big Brother Than Perfect Citizen

Raytheon, whose sales accounted for $25B USD in revenue last year, has reportedly not sold the software to any nation state clients -- yet.  It reportedly demoed the software to the U.S. government at a trade show in April.

President Obama has committed $200M USD to "big data" spending -- including efforts to track citizens online.  The Obama Administration has stated multiple times publicly that it seeks to protect citizen rights/expectations of privacy, but internally it's often fought to step up intrusive monitoring, arguing that such procedures are necessary to fight the shadowy ambiguous "terrorist" threat.

Raytheon is also authorized to export the software to foreign nations/corporations interested in using the "stalking software" on their targets, acccording to the "EAR99" designation in trade documents obtained by Guardian.  EAR99 indicates that the software can "be shipped without a [government] licence to most destinations under most circumstances."

The company already has one lucrative $100M USD counterterrorism contract from the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).  Dubbed "Perfect Citizen", the NSA software aims to deploy digital "sensors" (scripts) to detect impending cyberattacks on U.S. networks.  Some privacy experts have complained that Perfect Citizen was a guise for "Big Brother" style tracking.

Obama Big Brother
President Barack Obama has pushed for $200M USD in "big data" spending.
[Image Source: Fits News]

The NSA claims "Perfect Citizen" is a research and development project, and not fully deployed.  But EPIC obtained documents that “suggest the program is operational and confirmed, and that Raytheon was contracted to develop and deploy certain components."

By contrast RIOT takes a narrower aim at popular civilian internet activities.  That means it will likely serve little use in combatting terrorists (who are unlikely to post, tweet, or "check-in" during their evil escapades).  However, it does make the perfect tool for companies -- or governments -- to stalk citizens, and Raytheon is eager to turn that interest into sweet cash.

Sources: Guardian, YouTube



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Public Data
By Schrag4 on 2/12/2013 8:16:59 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
By mining exif data publicly available posts (or alternatively creating Facebook softbots to friend users and lure them into RIOT's circle of friendship),
...now again, if you're extremely cautious you can avoid that, but there is substantial risk


If you have to be extremely cautious not to add a softbot to your friend list then you're using FB wrong. That's like saying that people who text have to be extremely cautious not to fall into uncovered manholes or fountains in malls. You'd think it would be common sense to only add people that you know on FB, or to watch where you're going when you walk, but millions of people apparently lack common sense.

Oh, and I also don't want to pay for our govt to spy on us, but I agree that them going over the info that we post online, where there is no expectation of privacy, is pretty much the least of our concerns. How about if you don't want someone seeing something you don't post it on FB, m'kay?


RE: Public Data
By Ammohunt on 2/12/2013 11:23:07 AM , Rating: 2
if i were the NSA i would just write or piggy back on an innocuous Facebook application that everyone wants or uses with the permissions needed to access users friends lists. Its much easier than adding a bogus NSA friend most people blindly click when apps prompt them for access. I would do the same for Smartphones as well to broaden my data collection.


RE: Public Data
By Schrag4 on 2/12/2013 12:39:58 PM , Rating: 2
My point is that crying foul over the govt mining FB data is incredibly naive. There's absolutely no expectation of privacy for anything you submit to FB, or to anywhere on the web, really. That, and the NSA and other agencies are ALREADY doing FAR "WORSE" things, from a privacy-intrusion standpoint. I wouldn't waste time complaining about how Mr. Z. and others handle the FB data that you submit (it's no longer your data anyway) when there are things like warrentless wiretaps, warrentless planting of GPS trackers, and such going on.

Or to put it another way, those in power are positively elated that you would choose to waste your attention on such a relatively trivial intrusion and forget about the much bigger ones occurring all around you.


RE: Public Data
By Ammohunt on 2/12/2013 12:49:56 PM , Rating: 2
That is a very valid point the tools you really need to worry about are the ones that don't get leaked to the public. I agree! if you post a rant online and the authorities come down hard on you its your own stupid fault.


RE: Public Data
By MrBlastman on 2/12/2013 2:41:09 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
using FB is wrong


Correction.

I'm 100% Facebook free and I love it! You can't be tracked if there is no account to begin with.

People are fools to put their entire personal life online. Leave it to photo albums, phonecalls and meetings over coffee. Or how about getting together with family over the holidays? What happened to all that?

The only thing that is relevant is Facebook is irrelevant.

But, I guess social media makes some people feel important. Hope they enjoy being important enough to be monitored by their lovely, friendly, always on the lookout to protect them Federal Government.


RE: Public Data
By Schrag4 on 2/13/2013 1:22:04 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
I'm 100% Facebook free and I love it! You can't be tracked if there is no account to begin with .


Perhaps not having a FB account puts you on some list. Didn't they say a while back that not having a FB account was a red flag?

*adjusts tin-foil hat*


RE: Public Data
By lexluthermiester on 2/16/2013 2:41:06 AM , Rating: 2
Seriously? Making your online presence minimal is a good ideal! Period!


"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki