Print 45 comment(s) - last by lexluthermiest.. on Feb 16 at 2:41 AM

Software was pitched to the U.S. government, but not yet sold

Raytheon Comp. (RTN) has created a social networking tracking program called Rapid Information Overlay Technology -- or "RIOT", for short -- which is building a database of trillions of pieces of data on millions of users' social networking profiles.  The software digs into the usual suspects -- Facebook, Inc.'s (FB) ubiquitous social network, popular microblogging site Twitter, and FourSquare, whose location-aware apps boast 25 million users.

I. RIOT is Watching You

The idea of RIOT is to allow government agents to in a click or two examine both your behavior history, and more interestingly (or alarmingly) predict your potential future actions.

Today, mobile client use has finally overtaken desktop use for Facebook, the world's largest network.  But hidden in most mobile posts by Facebook's over 1 billion users is an information is an "exif" information tag, a special string that identifies the latitude and longitude the user posted from.  By mining exif data publicly available posts (or alternatively creating Facebook softbots to friend users and lure them into RIOT's circle of friendship), RIOT is capable of tracking citizens' daily movements.

In a video, Brian Urch, principle investigator on the RIOT project at Raytheon describes, "We're going to track one of our own employees."

By mining the publicly available information, the demo shows how the client determined that "Nick" commonly frequents Washington Nationals Park.  It even shows off a photo of a blonde whom Nick posed with at the park.

But RIOT's most powerful capability is trying to analyze the future.  Its spidery webs of information spread out, assessing the trends in Nick's behaviors.  It makes a discovery --  Nick goes to the gym each day at 6 a.m.

Mr Urch comments, "... So if you ever did want to try to get hold of Nick, or maybe get hold of his laptop, you might want to visit the gym at 6am on a Monday."

He encourages users with questions to shoot him an email at

II. Raytheon Fights to Keep Video Demo Secret

The video was never meant to be seen by the eyes of the public.  Raytheon asked Guardian, the top UK newspaper who obtained the video, not to post it.  Comments Raytheon's spokesperson:

Riot is a big data analytics system design we are working on with industry, national labs and commercial partners to help turn massive amounts of data into useable information to help meet our nation's rapidly changing security needs.

Its innovative privacy features are the most robust that we're aware of, enabling the sharing and analysis of data without personally identifiable information [such as social security numbers, bank or other financial account information] being disclosed.

But Raytheon's argument that the product was "proof of concept" was not enough to convince Guardian not to post the video.  But even before the video, clues about RIOT were leaking out.  A patent application filed by Raytheon in December -- -- contained details relating to the data mining technology in the software.

Watchful eye
[Image Source: Alex's Archives]

In an interview with Guardian, Ginger McCall, an attorney at the Washington, D.C.-based Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), complains, "Social networking sites are often not transparent about what information is shared and how it is shared.  Users may be posting information that they believe will be viewed only by their friends, but instead, it is being viewed by government officials or pulled in by data collection services like the Riot search."

III. RIOT is Even Better at Playing Big Brother Than Perfect Citizen

Raytheon, whose sales accounted for $25B USD in revenue last year, has reportedly not sold the software to any nation state clients -- yet.  It reportedly demoed the software to the U.S. government at a trade show in April.

President Obama has committed $200M USD to "big data" spending -- including efforts to track citizens online.  The Obama Administration has stated multiple times publicly that it seeks to protect citizen rights/expectations of privacy, but internally it's often fought to step up intrusive monitoring, arguing that such procedures are necessary to fight the shadowy ambiguous "terrorist" threat.

Raytheon is also authorized to export the software to foreign nations/corporations interested in using the "stalking software" on their targets, acccording to the "EAR99" designation in trade documents obtained by Guardian.  EAR99 indicates that the software can "be shipped without a [government] licence to most destinations under most circumstances."

The company already has one lucrative $100M USD counterterrorism contract from the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).  Dubbed "Perfect Citizen", the NSA software aims to deploy digital "sensors" (scripts) to detect impending cyberattacks on U.S. networks.  Some privacy experts have complained that Perfect Citizen was a guise for "Big Brother" style tracking.

Obama Big Brother
President Barack Obama has pushed for $200M USD in "big data" spending.
[Image Source: Fits News]

The NSA claims "Perfect Citizen" is a research and development project, and not fully deployed.  But EPIC obtained documents that “suggest the program is operational and confirmed, and that Raytheon was contracted to develop and deploy certain components."

By contrast RIOT takes a narrower aim at popular civilian internet activities.  That means it will likely serve little use in combatting terrorists (who are unlikely to post, tweet, or "check-in" during their evil escapades).  However, it does make the perfect tool for companies -- or governments -- to stalk citizens, and Raytheon is eager to turn that interest into sweet cash.

Sources: Guardian, YouTube

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Public Data
By NellyFromMA on 2/11/2013 4:38:11 PM , Rating: 3
Some of the problem,. which is highlighted in this article, is that company's aren't always forthcoming about what information is made available and to what extent.

We all know our pictured are on facebook because we put them there. Some are aware that facebook software automatically scans all pictures for face recognition.

I doubt many realize they provide their lat and long per post. I'm curious if this information is somehow populated when posting when your GPS is off.

Should the common person HAVE to be highly aware that anything they do is being logged, processed, and analyzed? I think that's the bigger picture regarding privacy. We used to have a right to it; now more and more we seemingly don't.

RE: Public Data
By ebakke on 2/11/2013 5:30:56 PM , Rating: 2
Should the common person HAVE to be highly aware that anything they do is being logged, processed, and analyzed? I think that's the bigger picture regarding privacy. We used to have a right to it; now more and more we seemingly don't.
Particularly if you're using a free product, yes.

You still have a right to privacy. You don't, however, have a right to use someone's product for free and demand that they handle data you give them in any certain way.

RE: Public Data
By Spuke on 2/11/2013 5:55:26 PM , Rating: 2
You don't, however, have a right to use someone's product for free and demand that they handle data you give them in any certain way.
Actually you can by not using their product but I know that's NEVER going to happen.

RE: Public Data
By ebakke on 2/11/2013 8:36:34 PM , Rating: 2
Yeah, that's the point I'm making. The cost of the product is that you get no say in how your data's handled.

RE: Public Data
By NellyFromMA on 2/13/2013 1:17:27 PM , Rating: 2
ACtually, I do just that. I use bing for most searches and while I have an S3, I'm eyying the next release of Windows phone. Will the commmon person do that, no. Does that mean the company's policy is actually good for its users, no.

So, your point is taken, but is somewhat irrelevant to the actual situation, which is that company aggragate and use your behavioral information to anticipate your actions and profile you and THE VAST MAJORITY of the users dont' realize the implications of this. That is a societal issue and is bigger than one company being allowed to exert its position in the market to do what they want in that regard.

That's my point. This isn't anti-Google as many will take it; It's pro-consumer. These privacy practices when ANY company does it are anti-consumer. Consumer's just don't have the know how or the inclination to take a moment to comprehend that because frankly, its a little absurd to expect them to.

^ That's the point

"This is from the It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki