backtop


Print 67 comment(s) - last by lexluthermiest.. on Feb 11 at 7:50 PM

It will save USPS $2 billion annually

Many aspects of our lives have made a digital transformation over the last decade or so. We no longer rent physical movies from the video store; we watch them on Netflix or Hulu. We no longer get subscriptions for or pick up the daily newspaper; we read the news online. We don't run to the bank as often for daily finances; we jump on our smartphone, tablet or computer for online banking.

The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) is seeing these shifts in technology as well, but can't seem to keep up. Many letters, bills, etc. can now be sent electronically rather than through the mail. Hence, in an effort to save some serious money, USPS will no longer deliver mail on Saturdays starting August 1, 2013.

Cutting mail delivery down to five days per week will save USPS about $2 billion annually. For fiscal 2012, USPS saw a net loss of $15.9 billion (three times the loss record one year previous).

While mail delivery is getting axed, USPS plans to continue package delivery on Saturdays since this particular area has seen a 14 percent increase since 2010. Mail will also still be delivered to P.O. boxes six days per week as well.

In addition, post offices will remain open on Saturdays to allow customers to drop mail/packages off, access post office boxes or buy postage stamps -- although hours will likely be cut.


USPS is expected to give an official announcement today without explicit congressional approval. Lawmakers have said this approval is necessary for a change like cutting Saturday mail delivery, but the USPS is arguing this claim.

As far as the American people go, USPS expects some opposition from those like rural communities that worry a change in scheduling could make low-cost deliveries of items like medication a thing of the past, and publishers who will have to adjust schedules with publication deadlines.

Just last month, it was reported that USPS wanted to be more digital-friendly in order to keep up with the times. The agency is working on a digital platform called MyPost, which will allow customers to log in and view all packages that they'll be receiving as well as those they've already received instead of searching several different sites that the packages may be coming from.

However, Paul Vogel, president of digital solutions at USPS, revealed that his office is like "a San Jose startup," with only 15 Android/Apple developers, consultants coming and going, one computer and his BlackBerry smartphone. Technological restrictions make upgrading hard to come by.

A few other major obstacles are legislation needed to get permission for new digital products, the USPS' huge instruction manual for just handful of current products (adding digital products and security certifications would turn that 1,500 page book into something unimaginable), and USPS' losses of nearly $16 billion last year led to legislative proposals to keep making cuts (hence, more digital tech may not be in the cards right now).

Source: Boston Business Journal



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: It's about time......
By bah12 on 2/6/2013 12:43:45 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
The USPS costs taxpayers nothing.
WRONG! (well sort of). Yes they cost us nothing directly, but there are several committees, and organizations funded by the taxpayer that oversee the USPS. They all cost loads of money. Plus hours upon hours of Congress's time (which you and I pay for). Specifically departments like the OIG which police USPS regulatory compliance (FYI the OIG 2013 budget is about $370 billion, granted not all of it is spent on USPS but the USPS is still the largest government employer).

https://oig.hhs.gov/reports-and-publications/budge...


RE: It's about time......
By bah12 on 2/6/2013 12:45:38 PM , Rating: 2
Sorry $370 million not billion, but either way there is a public cost to the USPS.


RE: It's about time......
By anactoraaron on 2/7/2013 12:01:32 AM , Rating: 1
quote:
Plus hours upon hours of Congress's time (which isn't needed to begin with )


There fixed that for you. Why oh why do we need oversight on an institution that was operating in the black for 225 years? Oh right. Government waste. There has never been a real need for all of this oversight - but it's a great way for politicians to thicken their wallets.


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki