Print 78 comment(s) - last by theokan.. on Feb 12 at 11:26 PM

Surface Pro is full of compromises

Microsoft's Surface RT hasn't exactly set the consumer tablet market ablaze since it was introduced late last year. According to IDC, Microsoft only shipped about 900,000 Surface RT tablets for Q4 2012 compared to 22.9 million for the iPad.
Despite a slow start with Surface RT, Microsoft is hoping for more success with its Surface Pro. Packing in a third generation Core i5 processor instead of the more limiting ARM-based processor its more svelte sibling, the Surface Pro can handle the vast Windows app library without breaking a sweat.
Even though Surface Pro isn't due to launch until February 9, reviews for the tablet went live tonight. Not surprisingly, reviewers loved the tablet's screen and its speedy Core i5 processor, but blasted the horrid battery life that puts it at the bottom of the pack.

The Surface Pro’s 10.6”, 1080p screen is a definite upgrade from the 1366x768 screen on the Surface RT. The reviewers seemed to be thoroughly impressed with its quality.
David Pierce/The Verge: The 10.6-inch, 1920 x 1080 panel on the Pro is gorgeous, maybe the best laptop screen I've ever seen. Blacks are deep and whites are bright (my MacBook Air's display looks comparatively yellowish now), and colors are both accurate and vibrant. Since it's 1080p, it also holds up to closer pixel-level scrutiny when you're holding the device nearer to your face in tablet mode.
But while the screen looks good, actual usability is a compromise between two extremes.
Tim Stevens/Engadget: By default, the tablet is set to scale text to 150 percent its original size, making most (but not all) menus and buttons huge and reasonably finger-friendly. That's great when you're actually using your fingers, but it results in a lot of wasted space on the display when you're using a mouse. More troublingly, it made the text and icons in many apps appear rather blurry…
When running apps at 100 percent, the visuals are much cleaner, and those who want maximum screen real estate will be happiest here -- but in this view scrollbars and other on-screen controls are tricky to hit accurately with a finger. Interacting with the desktop without a mouse suddenly becomes a chore.
The Surface Pro packs in a 1.7GHz Intel Core i5-3317u processor, 4GB of RAM, Intel integrated graphics, and an SSD (64GB or 128GB). Compared to the ARM processor used in the Surface RT, the Core i5 simply blazes along in performance.
Joanna Stern/ABC News: The Surface Pro does a nice job running lots of apps simultaneously. Powered by a Core i5 processor, 4GB of RAM and the 64GB solid-state drive, the Pro is just as capable and fast as most laptops. Programs load quickly and, in contrast to the Surface RT, there's none of that lag or stuttering when switching apps or swiping them in from the left. It also resumes from sleep in seconds and boots in under 10 seconds.
David Pierce/The Verge: In general, it runs remarkably smoothly. I consistently switch around between a dozen different apps, some streaming music or movies, and the Surface Pro never stumbled once in normal use — I was actually shocked at how quickly it would resume playing House of Cards on Netflix when I alt-tabbed my way back to the app. Where the Surface RT took forever to load anything, and stumbled its way through any kind of intensive task, the Pro simply flies.

Battery Life
When it comes to battery life, this is where the Surface Pro seemed to take the most criticism. The Surface Pro racked in anywhere from one-third to one-half the battery life of its Surface RT counterpart.
Michael Prospero/Laptop Magazine: Microsoft estimated that the battery life of the Surface Pro would be about half that of the Surface RT, and sadly, they were correct. On the LAPTOP Battery Test (Web surfing via Wi-Fi), the Pro lasted 4 hours and 37 minutes. That's about three hours less than the Surface RT (7:43), and about two-and-a-half hours less than the tablet average of 7:10.
Tim Stevens/Engadget: On our standard Windows battery rundown test, in which we fix the display brightness and loop a video endlessly to exhaustion, the Surface Pro scored just three hours and 46 minutes, despite having a 42.5Wh battery -- a third larger than the 31.5Wh pack in the Surface RT. That's just more than a third of the nine hours and 36 minutes the Surface RT scored, well lower than the similarly specced W700 (which managed seven hours) and short of every touch-friendly Windows 8 device we've yet tested.
CNET: If only the Surface Pro had excellent battery life. It doesn't. In our video-playback battery drain test, the Surface Pro lasted 4 hours and 31 minutes, regardless of whether the Type Cover was connected or not. That's not far off from some other high-powered 11- and 10-inch ultraportables, but it's a big step down the 6-hour mark on many ultrabooks. The Acer Iconia W700 lasted more than 7 hours despite having a similar processor.
By all accounts, the Surface Pro is a significant [second] step for Microsoft in the realm of tablet/convertible PCs. Performance is respectable, the screen is gorgeous (although legibility/usability could use some work), build quality/design is top notch, and it offers a decent allotment of ports/connectivity options. The overall weight/size, awkward typing positioning while on your lap, and the battery life will be big concerns, however, for many users. In summary, perhaps David Pierce of The Verge said it best:

Even a well-executed Surface still doesn't work for me, and I'd bet it doesn't work for most other people either. It's really tough to use on anything but a desk, and the wide, 16:9 aspect ratio pretty severely limits its usefulness as a tablet anyway. It's too big, too fat, and too reliant on its power cable to be a competitive tablet, and it's too immutable to do everything a laptop needs to do. In its quest to be both, the Surface is really neither. It's supposed to be freeing, but it just feels limiting.
We eagerly await Surface Pro2

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Reclaimer77 on 2/6/2013 3:26:29 PM , Rating: 2
There's an Ivy-Bridge quad-core (with HT) i3 with an HD 4000 IGP and much more efficiency. The i3-3225 I believe. Given the battery life of this thing, I believe that would have been a better option. It would be plenty of power for the Surface. There was really no reason to try and cram an i5 into the Surface Pro. Especially given the small screen size and resolution. There's just no need for that much horsepower.

By Pirks on 2/6/2013 4:18:16 PM , Rating: 2
I believe that would have been a better option
You believe 'cause you don't know jack about Win8 tablets, there's Acer W700 with 7 hrs of battery life and Core i5. 7 hrs is quite astonishing for a machine that is essentially a desktop replacement performance wise for most people. Besides there are also Clover Trail Win8 tablets that cost as low as $500 (Asus Vivo Tab) and have like 10 hrs of battery life while running all your typical desktop x86 software just as well, except for heavy weights like Photoshop (and this is where i5 tablets like W700 excel, iPad/Android have absolutely nothing to counterattack this).

MS has done some poor choices in hardware but they had their reasons. Whatever is missing from Surface line up is provided by other OEMs, like those nice and cheap Clover Trail tablets.

By Solandri on 2/6/2013 5:02:34 PM , Rating: 2
There's an Ivy-Bridge quad-core (with HT) i3 with an HD 4000 IGP and much more efficiency.

On the mobile processors, the i3 is just an i5 without Turbo Boost. There are also a few virtualization features missing, but Turbo Boost is the big one. So if you have a mobile i5 and want the "efficiency" of an i3, just turn Turbo Boost off.

In Windows, go to the control panel, power options, change plan setting, advanced. Scroll down to processor power management and change the maximum to something less than 100% (Turbo Boost only kicks in after the CPU hits 100%). you might want to create a custom power profile for this (name it no Turbo Boost) so you can quickly switch between TB on/off.

You can even see that there's little difference in the component pricing Intel charges PC manufacturers. The mobile i5 only costs $0-$15 more than the mobile i3 at equivalent clock speed. The manufacturers are taking advantage of the widespread misbelief that the i5 is much better than the i3 to charge a $50-$100 premium for it. It's only the desktop i5 which is much better than the desktop i3. The mobile i5 and i3 are practically the same.

By jabber on 2/9/2013 7:40:00 AM , Rating: 2
I must admit for the first version I would have gone with an i3 and then for the second either go to a higher i3 or the i5.

By crispbp04 on 2/12/2013 1:00:13 PM , Rating: 2
It's called a surface pro. It has to be fast. i3 does not cut it.

To make that a success surface should have been in 3 flavors:

Surface RT (arm)
Surface w/ win8 (clovertrail or lowest power i3)
Surface Pro w/ win8 pro (i5/i7)

"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki