Surface Pro Reviews: Excellent Performance, Gorgeous Screen, Poor Battery Life
February 5, 2013 10:44 PM
comment(s) - last by
Surface Pro is full of compromises
Microsoft's Surface RT hasn't exactly set the consumer tablet market ablaze since it was introduced late last year. According to IDC,
Microsoft only shipped about 900,000 Surface RT tablets
for Q4 2012 compared to 22.9 million for the iPad.
Despite a slow start with Surface RT, Microsoft is hoping for more success with its Surface Pro. Packing in a third generation Core i5 processor instead of the more limiting ARM-based processor its more svelte sibling, the Surface Pro can handle the vast Windows app library without breaking a sweat.
Even though Surface Pro
isn't due to launch until February 9
, reviews for the tablet went live tonight. Not surprisingly, reviewers loved the tablet's screen and its speedy Core i5 processor, but blasted the horrid battery life that puts it at the bottom of the pack.
The Surface Pro’s 10.6”, 1080p screen is a definite upgrade from the 1366x768 screen on the Surface RT. The reviewers seemed to be thoroughly impressed with its quality.
: The 10.6-inch, 1920 x 1080 panel on the Pro is gorgeous, maybe the best laptop screen I've ever seen. Blacks are deep and whites are bright (my MacBook Air's display looks comparatively yellowish now), and colors are both accurate and vibrant. Since it's 1080p, it also holds up to closer pixel-level scrutiny when you're holding the device nearer to your face in tablet mode.
But while the screen looks good, actual usability is a compromise between two extremes.
: By default, the tablet is set to scale text to 150 percent its original size, making most (but not all) menus and buttons huge and reasonably finger-friendly. That's great when you're actually using your fingers, but it results in a lot of wasted space on the display when you're using a mouse. More troublingly, it made the text and icons in many apps appear rather blurry…
When running apps at 100 percent, the visuals are much cleaner, and those who want maximum screen real estate will be happiest here -- but in this view scrollbars and other on-screen controls are tricky to hit accurately with a finger. Interacting with the desktop without a mouse suddenly becomes a chore.
The Surface Pro packs in a 1.7GHz Intel Core i5-3317u processor, 4GB of RAM, Intel integrated graphics, and an SSD (64GB or 128GB). Compared to the ARM processor used in the Surface RT, the Core i5 simply blazes along in performance.
: The Surface Pro does a nice job running lots of apps simultaneously. Powered by a Core i5 processor, 4GB of RAM and the 64GB solid-state drive, the Pro is just as capable and fast as most laptops. Programs load quickly and, in contrast to the Surface RT, there's none of that lag or stuttering when switching apps or swiping them in from the left. It also resumes from sleep in seconds and boots in under 10 seconds.
David Pierce/The Verge
: In general, it runs remarkably smoothly. I consistently switch around between a dozen different apps, some streaming music or movies, and the Surface Pro never stumbled once in normal use — I was actually shocked at how quickly it would resume playing House of Cards on Netflix when I alt-tabbed my way back to the app. Where the Surface RT took forever to load anything, and stumbled its way through any kind of intensive task, the Pro simply flies.
When it comes to battery life, this is where the Surface Pro seemed to take the most criticism. The Surface Pro racked in anywhere from one-third to one-half the battery life of its Surface RT counterpart.
: Microsoft estimated that the battery life of the Surface Pro would be about half that of the Surface RT, and sadly, they were correct. On the LAPTOP Battery Test (Web surfing via Wi-Fi), the Pro lasted 4 hours and 37 minutes. That's about three hours less than the Surface RT (7:43), and about two-and-a-half hours less than the tablet average of 7:10.
: On our standard Windows battery rundown test, in which we fix the display brightness and loop a video endlessly to exhaustion, the Surface Pro scored just three hours and 46 minutes, despite having a 42.5Wh battery -- a third larger than the 31.5Wh pack in the Surface RT. That's just more than a third of the nine hours and 36 minutes the Surface RT scored, well lower than the similarly specced W700 (which managed seven hours) and short of every touch-friendly Windows 8 device we've yet tested.
: If only the Surface Pro had excellent battery life. It doesn't. In our video-playback battery drain test, the Surface Pro lasted 4 hours and 31 minutes, regardless of whether the Type Cover was connected or not. That's not far off from some other high-powered 11- and 10-inch ultraportables, but it's a big step down the 6-hour mark on many ultrabooks. The Acer Iconia W700 lasted more than 7 hours despite having a similar processor.
By all accounts, the Surface Pro is a significant [second] step for Microsoft in the realm of tablet/convertible PCs. Performance is respectable, the screen is gorgeous (although legibility/usability could use some work), build quality/design is top notch, and it offers a decent allotment of ports/connectivity options. The overall weight/size, awkward typing positioning while on your lap, and the battery life will be big concerns, however, for many users. In summary, perhaps David Pierce of
said it best:
Even a well-executed Surface still doesn't work for me, and I'd bet it doesn't work for most other people either. It's really tough to use on anything but a desk, and the wide, 16:9 aspect ratio pretty severely limits its usefulness as a tablet anyway. It's too big, too fat, and too reliant on its power cable to be a competitive tablet, and it's too immutable to do everything a laptop needs to do. In its quest to be both, the Surface is really neither. It's supposed to be freeing, but it just feels limiting.
We eagerly await Surface Pro
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: I just want to run an MMO on it and sit on the couch
2/6/2013 12:49:03 PM
it could have come with windows XP and I wouldnt have cared...again the whole point is people want a tablet that they can install their existing x86 software.
I think the device is a great start, would like to see how it benches a bit more in the x86 side of the house.
screen, battery, SSD, an i5...idk why people thought it was going to weigh 1lb... its not made of paper and held together by kittens licking it...
we just came from 7+lb gaming laptop to around 2lbs...but nooooo that extra half lb is going to give everyone herpes.
RE: I just want to run an MMO on it and sit on the couch
2/6/2013 1:59:16 PM
Windows 8 aside, yes people can install their x86 software but that leaves the question, what are you going to want to run on this machine? Tax software? Most everyone is used to their 15"+ screens and now we have this squished tiny 16:9 screen. Seriously, RT comes with office, you have a browser and apps to cover, rdp, vpn, vnc, ssh, and most all else. This device can't play any modern games so why is an i5 necessary, are people seriously going to be running photoshop on this?
laptops but this is not for gaming system (Intel 4000 GPU) nor are we living in the past. That 2 pound quote is without the keyboard, so be prepared to lug around that as well. This device hasn't even hit the market and its already showing its age.
$1000 + $155 keyboard for something that kind of sits in the middle between a good tablet and an ultra-portable laptop. Hard to swallow when it's lacking in resolution, battery life, weight, price, size and no LTE option compared to top tablets. On the laptop side, it doesn't include a keyboard in the price, tiny screen, can't use/rest on your lap with they keyboard, bad battery life and requires $50 adapters for hdmi/vga.
RE: I just want to run an MMO on it and sit on the couch
2/8/2013 11:29:42 AM
Your specs for a tablet and what you think a tablet should be is very different from what I want, obviously.
I want my tablet to be a touch screen extension of my desktop. That's not saying I should be able to do everything my desktop can on my tablet, but when I need to be in the living room with my family it would be nice if I could still get some work done or play a DECENT (not freaking angry birds) game. I want my tablet to do a much of my desktop stuff as I can get away with, and why shouldn't it be able to? Do we really need yet another screen to consume the freaking internet with? Yay, a portable Facebook computer! SCREW Facebook. Do I want adobe cs6, visual studio, Microsoft office, AutoCAD, Maya, VMware workstation, etc. on my tablet... hell yes I do!
Contrary to your opinion just because the device has a keyboard, doesn't mean it NEEDS a keyboard. My tablet has a keyboard too; it sits on my desk so when I get back into my office I can dock my tablet for more efficient use. Otherwise I just grab my tablet and walk around with it. If I'm going on a trip I'll throw the keyboard and a spare mouse in a backpack, simple enough. I don't have to lug it around with me everywhere.
My current tablet doesn't have LTE either and I don't miss it. LTE works well with phones because I can pull my phone out anywhere (due to its size and the fact that it resides on my waste via belt). I can be absolutely anywhere and pull my phone out and hit the net quickly. That would be nice for a tablet but tablets are by nature more cumbersome than phones and therefore less likely to be easily accessible when I'm not near Wi-Fi. Then there are the phone companies. When you have to pay as much as you do to share two measly GB through Verizon, I'm not interested! Besides, if I need internet that bad, tethering is trivial for me to accomplish.
As far as battery life is concerned, use the power profiles. Every windows system has them. Set one up for max battery and max performance. Max performance will probably give you somewhere around 4 hours and on full charge and max battery will give you somewhere around 8 even with windows 7! (I know, I’ve tested it!) That's the beauty of windows, if you don't need the power then nothing says you need to use it, but for that random time when you do it'll be there for you.
I'm not saying this is the perfect tablet or that it's something I would buy, but it is a decent start. $1k is a bit high for what they are offering and the adapter thing is a little bit annoying. Other than that, it's pretty solid.
"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber
IPad Market Share Falls Slightly, Microsoft Surface Sales Weak
January 31, 2013, 1:03 PM
Quick Note: Microsoft Surface Pro Coming February 9
January 22, 2013, 1:12 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information