Evasi0n iOS 6.x Jailbreak Downloaded 800,000 Times in First 6 Hours
February 5, 2013 5:49 PM
comment(s) - last by
Cydia had been installed 1.7 million times by Tuesday
A new jailbreak for iOS finally arrived earlier this week, and it looks like a lot of Apple users were eager to try it out.
According to Jay Freeman, an administrator at alt appstore Cydia (a marketplace for unapproved applications),
the new evasi0n jailbreak for iOS 6.x
devices was installed 800,000 times within six hours of its release.
Freeman further revealed that Cydia had been installed 1.7 million times by Tuesday, and had about 14,000 hits per minute at peak download times. This caused the server to crash several times.
The evasi0n jailbreak allows users to install unauthorized apps onto iPhones, iPads and iPod touch devices. More specifically, it supports iPhone 3GS/4/4S/5, iPad 2/3/4, iPad mini and iPod touch (fourth and fifth generations)
evasi0n jailbreak is the first for iOS 6.x, and is also the first release since the Redsn0w
jailbreak for 5.1.1. Making jailbreaks for iOS devices have become increasingly difficult since Apple has tried to crack down on security and keep iOS as closed as possible.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: << 1%
2/6/2013 3:12:50 AM
I don't know. They have all sorts of dumb patents, but in over five years they haven't done it.
The only other example that comes to mind is that Microsoft is capable of remotely bricking 360s that have been modified to run pirated games via software update. Whether or not they've actually followed through with it is still up for debate though, so who knows? Some say they have, Microsoft has gone on the record to say they've never done it.
Deliberately bricking isn't a common practice for
company, it seems. I can't think of any examples that go beyond hearsay.
RE: << 1%
2/6/2013 10:54:28 AM
Bricking is not commonly done because it's illegal. Courts have a naughty habit of throwing out those EULAs and service agreements companies use to authorize and justify an ability to brick a device (or limit your rights in other ways). If it were actually ever done - the first court case through would make it clear that you may not deliberately dispossess a person of their rights to a product they purchased simply because they may (presumption of innocence) have committed some other illegal act.
"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive
Quick Note: Untethered Jailbreak for iOS 6.x Released
February 4, 2013, 2:23 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information