Print 11 comment(s) - last by Skywalker123.. on Feb 10 at 10:35 AM

Attacker was not revealed, agency promises to beef up security

U.S. federal law does not require government agencies to reveal if they've been hacked -- even if confidential information is lost -- unless personal information is stolen in a breach.  Unfortunately for the U.S. Department of Energy, personal information was indeed lost on a recent hack on its systems from an unknown assailant.

In a letter to employees obtained by Reuters and other news agencies, the DOE writes, "[The attack] resulted in the unauthorized disclosure of employee and contractor Personally Identifiable Information.  Based on the findings of this investigation, no classified data was compromised."

The attack occurred in mid-January.  It is unclear whether the attack was on the DOE headquarters, or on a sub-agency, such as the Energy Information Administration, which publishes data that helps keep oil, gas and electricity markets stable.  Also unclear is the identity of the hackers.  Many attacks on government facilities have come from China in recent years, however, domestic hackers also frequently have a bone to pick with the government.

The DOE, which handles classified information on nuclear safety and the energy markets, has been one of the many government agencies to be criticized for weak security in recent years.  In a shocking 2006 incident, a methamphetamine lab was found to have memory sticks containing classified documents from Los Alamos National Lab, a top nuclear research facility.  It was unclear how the drug manufacturers got their hands on the sensitive files.

Department of Energy
The U.S. Department of Energy was hacked last month. [Image Source:]

In its letter the DOE promised to tighten security.  It said it was deploying new tools both to protect assets on its servers and to monitor activity for signs of trouble.

The DOE is currently in a leadership transition period, with Energy Secretary Steven Chu unexpectedly resigning.

Source: Reuters

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Leadership Change
By IS81 on 2/5/2013 4:55:00 PM , Rating: 3
It will be interesting to see if the upcoming change in leadership has any effect on the situation. Chu was vocally anti-security and made deliberate efforts to reduce security in the interest of cutting cost and increasing efficiency. Perhaps these were the right policies overall and perhaps not, but this outcome should have been an expected result regardless.

RE: Leadership Change
By stm1185 on 2/5/2013 5:11:46 PM , Rating: 5
Does anyone believe it wasn't China? Anyone at all.

RE: Leadership Change
By dsx724 on 2/5/2013 6:35:05 PM , Rating: 2
Have you ever considered that the private market has much more to gain from this data than a foreign government? You can make millions in a clean get-away in futures or risk management with the data. What possible good would this data do the Chinese government?

RE: Leadership Change
By IS81 on 2/5/2013 6:49:12 PM , Rating: 2
Foreign governments are still very interested in personal information on government employees, even those without direct access to classified information.

RE: Leadership Change
By NellyFromMA on 2/6/2013 1:11:28 PM , Rating: 1
Sure. North Korea, Iran, Syria, Russia, Pakistan, even India are all potentials.

Sadly, it could even be domestic.

"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki