backtop


Print 64 comment(s) - last by theapparition.. on Feb 11 at 10:53 AM

Not all small turbo engines are more fuel-efficient says Consumer Reports

Consumer Reports isn't letting up on its testing of fuel efficiency claims for various vehicles. According to the publication, small turbocharged engines aren't delivering on the fuel efficiency claims by the manufacturers.

Small displacement turbocharged engines have become common in a variety of vehicles in place of larger displacement, naturally aspirated engines. The claim by the automotive manufacturers is that the small displacement turbocharged engines offer the same power as larger displacement engines and improved fuel efficiency.

Consumer Reports, however, states that in its real world testing many vehicles with turbocharged engines aren't as efficient as the manufacturers claim. The publication recently tested the 1.6-liter EcoBoost in a Ford Fusion and found that the turbocharged version has a slower 0-to-60 mph time than its competitors and achieved only 25 mpg in testing, making it among the worst for fuel efficiency in the recent crop of family sedans.

The publication also claims that the larger 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder, which promises the power of the V-6 with the fuel economy of four-cylinder engine, fails to deliver on either front.


2013 Ford Fusion

Chevrolet is also under fire for the 1.4-liter turbo four-cylinder in the Cruze. Consumer Reports claims that real world performance wasn’t much better than the standard, naturally aspirated 1.8-liter engine and overall fuel economy was similar as well.
 
Ford and General Motors representatives offered similar statements explaining the discrepancy. "When you have an EcoBoost engine, you have the opportunity to have performance and fuel economy, but not at the same time,” said Ford Powertrain Communications Manager Richard Truett. “EcoBoost adds a dimension that you won't get by just making the engine smaller. We're telling the driver, it's up to you on how you want to drive."

"The Cruze turbocharged engine provides a much broader torque curve than a non-turbocharged engine, and that means better acceleration across the rpm range, making for a more fun-to-drive car,” said GM spokesman Tom Read. “However, if you have a heavy foot on a turbocharged engine, you're not necessarily going to see a lot of fuel economy benefits."

The EPA is going to investigate Ford after Consumer Reports and other owners have complained that fuel efficiency doesn't meet the automakers claims in the Fusion Hybrid and C-MAX.

Source: Consumer Reports



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Consumer Reports is at it again...
By RandomUsername3245 on 2/5/2013 9:55:12 AM , Rating: 0
Car magazines typically get worse-than-EPA mileage because the reviewers drive with a lead foot. I guess that Consumer Reports is the only magazine that does not admit this, and instead they complain about it.

As far as performance goes, the numbers don't lie...

CR is full of crap as usual.




RE: Consumer Reports is at it again...
By Nutzo on 2/5/2013 12:56:28 PM , Rating: 2
Yet they get close to the rated milage on many cars such as the Camry and Prius.

Thier complaint is with a few of the newer card that are getting much worse than the rated milage.


RE: Consumer Reports is at it again...
By Spuke on 2/5/13, Rating: 0
By theapparition on 2/5/2013 6:11:44 PM , Rating: 1
Basically.........NO!

But while CR is clearly biased, and tends to rate things like the amount of force used to close a door or number of cup holders higher than more important things, I do think they have some validity with these tests.


RE: Consumer Reports is at it again...
By DT_Reader on 2/5/13, Rating: 0
By Dorkyman on 2/7/2013 4:17:16 PM , Rating: 2
I don't see that.

CR employs a bunch of engineers who look at things from a logical perspective. They usually lay out their criteria in advance so the reader can judge for oneself whether those attributes valued by CR are relevant. As an EE myself I find the tests and conclusions very informative.


"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet.  A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki