Federal Appeals Court Blocks EPA's Cellulosic Ethanol Target
January 29, 2013 3:33 PM
comment(s) - last by
Court argues that goal is simply too unrealistic
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has pushed aggressively in recent years to promote advanced fuels such as recycled waste oil (biodiesel) and cellulosic ethanol. It also has pushed unpopular corn ethanol,
a food-crop based biofuel
, on the consumer market.
I. EPA Mandate Dealt a Blow
The EPA's weapon to push fuels is its ability to set blending targets that fuel distributors have to meet or risk fines. In recent months the EPA has been under fire for its
efforts to enforce an E-15
(15 percent corn ethanol) blending target. However, in U.S. Appeals Court of the D.C. Circuit, it was the other half of its initiatives -- the advanced biofuels blending targets -- that were on the chopping block.
The Appeals Court ruled this week that the EPA's blending targets for a particular type of advanced biofuel --
-- were simply infeasible. The EPA had demanded that between 2010 and 2012,
20 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol
be produced. But to date almost no cellulosic ethanol has been blended into commercial fuel, and cellulosic ethanol startups have been unable to provide significant stock to blenders.
The EPA claims it has the authority to enforce blends based on the
2007 Energy Act
passed under the Bush Administration, which promoted biofuels (and corn ethanol) growth.
But the Appeals court
[PDF] that argument calling the decision to enforce targets on refiners -- customers of the fuel producers -- rather than the producers themselves as a bizarre and unprecedented government effort.
A Federal Appeals Court has banned the EPA from enforcing cellulosic ethanol blending targets.
[Image Source: Free Enterprise]
The three-judge panel writes, "We are not convinced that Congress meant for E.P.A. to let that intent color its work as a predictor, to let the wish be father to the thought. ...Apart from their role as captive consumers, the refiners are in no position to ensure, or even contribute to, growth in the cellulosic biofuel industry ... [The EPA's message was essentially], 'Do a good job, cellulosic fuel producers. If you fail, we’ll fine your customers.'"
A key fuel industry figure,
American Petroleum Institute
’s director for downstream and industry operations, cheered the ruling, telling
The New York Times
, "There is no onus or accountability on the person who is producing the fuel. They’re incentivized to pump up their projections via press release, and make rosy estimates because there’s no skin off their back if they fail to hit those."
II. Cellulosic Ethanol Damaged, But Not Dead, Other Biofuels Remain Intact
But the court stopped short of handing the refiners (blenders) a total victory. It still left targets regarding biodiesel from fat, waste oil, soybean oil, or other sources intact. It also left targets for sugarcane ethanol -- regarded as another "advanced" biofuel -- intact.
Renewable Fuel Association
(RFA), while disappointed about the cellulosic ethanol rejection, praised the court for not adopting a broader rollback, while defending the EPA's estimates. The RFA
, "The EPA did not determine a reasonably achievable volume and then inflate it. Rather, it set the volume based on the best information available to it at the time."
Cellulosic ethanol remains an interesting idea. Unlike food crop ethanol, it doesn't put pressure on food prices. It in theory would
bolster U.S. energy security
, while minimizing the importance of oil producing states, many of which are hostile to the U.S. And by repurposing carbon-containing waste instead of burning fossil fuels, cellulosic ethanol would cut carbon emissions (versus corn-ethanol which has been
shown to increase net carbon emissions
, compared to petroleum).
Cellulose forms the "woody" component in most plant leaves and stems. It is harder to break down than "sugarier" plant carbohydrates. [Image Source: CUNY]
Two cellulosic ethanol startups -- Inios Bio and KiOR -- claim to be "near" commercial production, after tens of millions in startup capital. But neither company has a working commercial scale plant yet.
Other cellulosic ethanol companies --
such as Coskata
, which General Motors Comp. (
) backed pre-bankruptcy -- are still floating around,
showcasing "semi-commercial" scale
plants. But compared to the ambitious claims of a few years back, it would certainly seem such firms have lost a degree of their momentum.
Federal Appeals Court
Renewable Fuels Association [reaction]
The New York Times
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: wrong interpretation
1/30/2013 2:05:25 PM
Yes, and good for the court. I wish they had banned the corn alcohol requirement as well. It is ludicrous to utilize food production in the false hope that it is somehow more "green". Typical of government interference, it drives up the cost of both corn and fuel, not to mention reducing the amount of available food in a world that still has plenty people without enough food.
RE: wrong interpretation
2/2/2013 1:45:27 AM
Corn ethanol is a corporate welfare fiasco that won't be dying any time soon.
RE: wrong interpretation
2/3/2013 2:38:42 PM
There is too much money tied up in kickbacks/lobbying for that to happen any time soon.
"Nowadays, security guys break the Mac every single day. Every single day, they come out with a total exploit, your machine can be taken over totally. I dare anybody to do that once a month on the Windows machine." -- Bill Gates
EPA Clears the Way for E15 Fuel at Local Gas Stations
June 19, 2012, 9:34 AM
EPA Silently Continues Support for Corn Ethanol, Bumping Target for 2012
December 30, 2011, 1:56 PM
EPA Drastically Cuts Cellulosic Ethanol Requirement in Fuel for 2012
June 22, 2011, 11:50 AM
FedEx CEO: "Addiction" to Foreign Oil is Costing the Economy, American Lives
May 20, 2011, 8:37 AM
Study: Corn Ethanol Increases Global Warming, Grass Ethanol Fights It
December 8, 2008, 8:45 AM
Tesla’s Elon Musk Says that Fully Autonomous Vehicles Are Still at Least 5 Years Away
September 19, 2014, 9:48 AM
Quick Note: Kia Soul EV Priced from $33,700
September 11, 2014, 5:32 PM
Production Infiniti LE Electric Sedan Leaked in Patent Drawings
September 9, 2014, 10:32 AM
"Decepticon" Driver Triumphs Over Cops in Massachusetts Court
September 5, 2014, 12:07 PM
Tesla Motors Confirms Nevada Gigafactory Deal, Will Receive $1.25B in Tax Breaks
September 4, 2014, 8:24 PM
Mazda Unveils the 2016 MX-5 Miata, Drops 220 Pounds and 3" in Length
September 3, 2014, 8:59 PM
Most Popular Articles
HTC Preps Nexus 9 With Nvidia K1 64-Bit "Denver" SoC, Android L Onboard
September 10, 2014, 10:21 PM
Quick Note: Buy an Xbox One Sept 7-13, Get a Free Game
September 4, 2014, 10:42 AM
Apple Announces Its Smartwatch: The $349 Apple Watch
September 9, 2014, 2:09 PM
Dell Announces "World's Thinnest" Tablet: The Venue 8 7000 Series
September 11, 2014, 8:51 AM
T-Mobile Launches Un-carrier 7.0, Beefs Up Wi-Fi Calling
September 11, 2014, 2:56 PM
Latest Blog Posts
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information