Federal Appeals Court Blocks EPA's Cellulosic Ethanol Target
January 29, 2013 3:33 PM
comment(s) - last by
Court argues that goal is simply too unrealistic
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has pushed aggressively in recent years to promote advanced fuels such as recycled waste oil (biodiesel) and cellulosic ethanol. It also has pushed unpopular corn ethanol,
a food-crop based biofuel
, on the consumer market.
I. EPA Mandate Dealt a Blow
The EPA's weapon to push fuels is its ability to set blending targets that fuel distributors have to meet or risk fines. In recent months the EPA has been under fire for its
efforts to enforce an E-15
(15 percent corn ethanol) blending target. However, in U.S. Appeals Court of the D.C. Circuit, it was the other half of its initiatives -- the advanced biofuels blending targets -- that were on the chopping block.
The Appeals Court ruled this week that the EPA's blending targets for a particular type of advanced biofuel --
-- were simply infeasible. The EPA had demanded that between 2010 and 2012,
20 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol
be produced. But to date almost no cellulosic ethanol has been blended into commercial fuel, and cellulosic ethanol startups have been unable to provide significant stock to blenders.
The EPA claims it has the authority to enforce blends based on the
2007 Energy Act
passed under the Bush Administration, which promoted biofuels (and corn ethanol) growth.
But the Appeals court
[PDF] that argument calling the decision to enforce targets on refiners -- customers of the fuel producers -- rather than the producers themselves as a bizarre and unprecedented government effort.
A Federal Appeals Court has banned the EPA from enforcing cellulosic ethanol blending targets.
[Image Source: Free Enterprise]
The three-judge panel writes, "We are not convinced that Congress meant for E.P.A. to let that intent color its work as a predictor, to let the wish be father to the thought. ...Apart from their role as captive consumers, the refiners are in no position to ensure, or even contribute to, growth in the cellulosic biofuel industry ... [The EPA's message was essentially], 'Do a good job, cellulosic fuel producers. If you fail, we’ll fine your customers.'"
A key fuel industry figure,
American Petroleum Institute
’s director for downstream and industry operations, cheered the ruling, telling
The New York Times
, "There is no onus or accountability on the person who is producing the fuel. They’re incentivized to pump up their projections via press release, and make rosy estimates because there’s no skin off their back if they fail to hit those."
II. Cellulosic Ethanol Damaged, But Not Dead, Other Biofuels Remain Intact
But the court stopped short of handing the refiners (blenders) a total victory. It still left targets regarding biodiesel from fat, waste oil, soybean oil, or other sources intact. It also left targets for sugarcane ethanol -- regarded as another "advanced" biofuel -- intact.
Renewable Fuel Association
(RFA), while disappointed about the cellulosic ethanol rejection, praised the court for not adopting a broader rollback, while defending the EPA's estimates. The RFA
, "The EPA did not determine a reasonably achievable volume and then inflate it. Rather, it set the volume based on the best information available to it at the time."
Cellulosic ethanol remains an interesting idea. Unlike food crop ethanol, it doesn't put pressure on food prices. It in theory would
bolster U.S. energy security
, while minimizing the importance of oil producing states, many of which are hostile to the U.S. And by repurposing carbon-containing waste instead of burning fossil fuels, cellulosic ethanol would cut carbon emissions (versus corn-ethanol which has been
shown to increase net carbon emissions
, compared to petroleum).
Cellulose forms the "woody" component in most plant leaves and stems. It is harder to break down than "sugarier" plant carbohydrates. [Image Source: CUNY]
Two cellulosic ethanol startups -- Inios Bio and KiOR -- claim to be "near" commercial production, after tens of millions in startup capital. But neither company has a working commercial scale plant yet.
Other cellulosic ethanol companies --
such as Coskata
, which General Motors Comp. (
) backed pre-bankruptcy -- are still floating around,
showcasing "semi-commercial" scale
plants. But compared to the ambitious claims of a few years back, it would certainly seem such firms have lost a degree of their momentum.
Federal Appeals Court
Renewable Fuels Association [reaction]
The New York Times
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: wrong interpretation
1/30/2013 2:05:25 PM
Yes, and good for the court. I wish they had banned the corn alcohol requirement as well. It is ludicrous to utilize food production in the false hope that it is somehow more "green". Typical of government interference, it drives up the cost of both corn and fuel, not to mention reducing the amount of available food in a world that still has plenty people without enough food.
RE: wrong interpretation
2/2/2013 1:45:27 AM
Corn ethanol is a corporate welfare fiasco that won't be dying any time soon.
RE: wrong interpretation
2/3/2013 2:38:42 PM
There is too much money tied up in kickbacks/lobbying for that to happen any time soon.
"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings
EPA Clears the Way for E15 Fuel at Local Gas Stations
June 19, 2012, 9:34 AM
EPA Silently Continues Support for Corn Ethanol, Bumping Target for 2012
December 30, 2011, 1:56 PM
EPA Drastically Cuts Cellulosic Ethanol Requirement in Fuel for 2012
June 22, 2011, 11:50 AM
FedEx CEO: "Addiction" to Foreign Oil is Costing the Economy, American Lives
May 20, 2011, 8:37 AM
Study: Corn Ethanol Increases Global Warming, Grass Ethanol Fights It
December 8, 2008, 8:45 AM
Study Predicts Self-Driving Vehicles Could Rake in Billions
March 6, 2015, 8:34 AM
Dual-Motor Tesla Model S P85D's "Insane Mode" Shocks Passengers
January 28, 2015, 11:18 PM
2016 Cadillac CTS-V Packs 640 hp Punch with 200 mph Reach
January 23, 2015, 3:25 PM
BMW Testing Tech to Allow Users to Auto-Park, Summon Cars Via Smartwatch
December 16, 2014, 9:30 AM
Lamborghini Offers Up $6,000 Leather-Bound Android Smartphone
December 12, 2014, 3:12 PM
Quick Note: GM Teases Next Generation Chevrolet Volt
November 20, 2014, 3:26 PM
Most Popular Articles
WSJ Report Implies That Google Leveraged Lobbying to Kill Antitrust Abuse Probe
March 25, 2015, 5:37 PM
Texan WISP Owner With Colorful History Sues to Block FCC Net Neutrality Rules
March 24, 2015, 1:19 PM
Samsung, Dell, Pegatron to Preinstall Microsoft Office 365 on Android Devices
March 23, 2015, 4:02 PM
Half a Billion Dollars of U.S. Weaponry May be Lost to al-Qaeda, Rebels in Yemen
March 23, 2015, 2:12 PM
NVIDIA's Latest Windows 10 Drivers: Still Too Unstable For Primetime
March 24, 2015, 4:45 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information