backtop


Print 34 comment(s) - last by AnnihilatorX.. on Jan 25 at 7:28 PM

BPA alternative may cause just as many problems

A little over four years ago, BPA was linked to a number of medical conditions including diabetes, asthma, and cancer among others. The chemical was commercially introduced in 1957, and was used in a wide range of products including food containers and bottles. Due to the backlash over BPA-related health risks, many manufacturers stopped using the chemical in their products.

In response, companies that offered plastic products containing BPA switched to Bisphenol S (BPS). BPA and BPS are very similar structurally, making the latter a good “drop-in replacement” for the former.

Researchers at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston are now reporting that widespread human exposure to BPS was confirmed in 2012 during the analysis of urine samples taken in the U.S., Japan, and China. The research study found that BPS disrupts cellular responses to the hormone estrogen, changing the pattern of cell growth -- even low levels of BPS exposure were enough to interfere with hormones.

"Our studies show that BPS is active at femtomolar to picomolar concentrations just like endogenous hormones -- that's in the range of parts per trillion to quadrillion," said UTMB professor Cheryl Watson, senior author of a paper on the study now online in the advance publications section of Environmental Health Perspectives. "Those are levels likely to be produced by BPS leaching from containers into their contents."

The backlash against BPA was fast and furious, but it may take some more time (and additional studies) to determine if BPS will encounter the same fate.

Source: Science Daily



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Here's a thought...
By lexluthermiester on 1/24/2013 3:22:19 PM , Rating: 2
Rabbit? WTH? Who the heck eats rabbit? Chicken? Sure. Turkey? Sure. But rabbit?

And distilled water is not the same as deionized water. There ARE differences. Distilled water, depending on the method used to distil it, can be very acidic. In amounts greater than 20oz it can be toxic to any large mammal, including humans. And it will corrode the enamel of our teeth worse than ANY soda pop. High school chemistry knowledge is all that is needed to know such, IF you paid attention is class. And as one of the commentators in the dept of energy page you sited even said "in large amounts" it's toxic.

If you're going to make statements as though they are facts, place get your terms and science straight. And while the gov site you sited is credible, it does show there is a variety of opinion on the topic and should not be taken as hard fact.


RE: Here's a thought...
By AnnihilatorX on 1/25/2013 7:28:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
In amounts greater than 20oz it can be toxic to any large mammal, including humans.


Actually, drinking 20oz of even normal water can kill any human due to overhydration... point is moot.


"This is from the DailyTech.com. It's a science website." -- Rush Limbaugh














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki