Print 42 comment(s) - last by GoatMonkey.. on Jun 30 at 11:01 AM

Performance-per-watt results, Revision "G" quad-core detailed

Performance results for dual-core Opterons

Memo containing the details on how to decode the new model numbers
Death to single core!

AMD is set introduce Next-Generation AMD Opteron processors on August 1st, 2006. The Next-Generation AMD Opteron processors were previously known as AMD Opteron revision F CPUs. Following the release of socket AM2 processors the Next-Generation AMD Opteron comes in a new socket -- Socket F. Socket F sports 1,207 pins in a land-grid array similar to Intel’s LGA775 and LGA771 sockets. The new Socket F will be used for dual, quad and eight way processor configurations with up to 16 cores at launch.

AMD and Intel are both pushing efficiency this year, and AMD is already taking a shot at Intel with its dual and quad-core systems.  AMD claims its quad-core Socket F processor, scheduled for launch in 2007, will use the exact same power efficiency as the dual-core processors available today.  According to AMD's documentation (right), 90nm 95W dual-core Opterons (scheduled for launch this August) will have the same power draw as 65nm quad-core processors. 

Socket F AMD Opteron processors add support for DDR2 and AMD Virtualization. DDR2 with speeds up to 667MHz is supported while the AM2 Athlon 64 X2 and FX chips support DDR2 800MHz. FB-DIMM memory will not initially be supported by Socket F processors. AMD intends to add FB-DIMM support to its processors in the 2008 with the K8L architecture -- nearly two years after Intel launched support. Upcoming revision "G" quad-core processors will also support the Socket F. Previous features such as the integrated memory controller, HyperTransport Technology and AMD64 Execution will continue to be standard features on Socket F processor. With a new socket comes a new naming system too.

This time around AMD has moved to a four digit model number system. Three AMD Opteron families will be available at launch: 1000, 2000 and 8000. 1000 series processors will be Socket AM2 based and replace the existing AMD Opteron 100 series. 2000 series will be Socket F based and aimed towards dual processor systems. 8000 series will be available for four and eight way processor configurations. All three AMD Opteron series will be available as dual-core only. Socket F marks the death of single-core AMD Opteron processors.

Decoding the new model numbers is not too different from the existing system. The addition of a fourth digit simply adds generation designation. The first digit coincides to the series while the second digit coincides with the processor generation. Clock speeds are determined by the last two digits of the model number starting with 10 and increasing in increments of 2. An example of how the new model number works would be the "AMD Opteron 8218" -- which is an eight-way capable processor that’s a second generation Opteron design and clocked at 2.6GHz.

AMD is expected to introduce a full lineup of Socket F processors similar to what it’s done with socket AM2 processors. Socket F processors will be available in models x210, x212, x214, x216, x218 and x220 which are 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, 2.6 and 2.8GHz parts, respectively. Regular, HE and SE AMD Opteron models will be available, though clock speeds will vary depending on the Opteron model. Thermal data power for regular AMD Opteron processors will be around 95 watts and 55 watts for AMD Opteron HE processors. Flagship AMD Opteron Model 2220 SE and 8220 SE have a 120 watt TDP while the Socket AM2 AMD Opteron Model 1220 SE has a slightly higher 125 watt TDP. All Opteron processors will have a 1MB of L2 dedicated to each processor core.

Availability is expected July 17th, 2006 under embargo from approved distributors while retail availability is expected August 1st, 2006.

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

AMD's stupidity
By cnimativ on 6/22/2006 11:17:49 AM , Rating: 1
AMD talked so much trash about FB-DIMM, and yet they are going to implement it in 2008. Hypocrisy at its zenith.

Strip away the memories, AMD system consumes more power at a lower performance.

The RSA features of FB-DIMM is unmatched by ECC DDR2. Period.

RE: AMD's stupidity
By formulav8 on 6/22/2006 12:01:45 PM , Rating: 2
The only trash AMD talked about in regards to FB-Dimm is that Intel is FORCING it upon its customers. AMD is going to give the customer a CHOICE. They can either use DDR2 or FB-Dimms. AMD's has always had plans to use FB-Dimms, just down the road. And FB-Dimms run hotter than DDR2 and IIRC uses more power. Thats all I remember them saying anything bad about FB-Dimms.


RE: AMD's stupidity
By hans007 on 6/24/2006 6:46:07 PM , Rating: 2
you're the one that is a super fanboy apparently.

people actually want fb-dimm for one thing. amd doesnt give you A CHOICE either as none of their cpus support it. if you max out an opteron with tons of ram, since theres is no fb-dimm you have to run the ram at lower clocks.

that and intel could release a non fb-dimm chipset if they wanted to seeing as the non server based conroe cpus have perfectly fine ddr2 chipsets.

people in IT seem to like fb-dimm and besides fb-dimm will start using less power once the buffer chips are more refined and that will change considerably in the near future.

RE: AMD's stupidity
By Viditor on 6/24/2006 10:06:22 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, judging by the timing I'd say that AMD is planning on starting with FBD2 using DDR3.

RE: AMD's stupidity
By hstewarth on 6/22/2006 1:12:33 PM , Rating: 2
Yes there is a lot of stupid things against FB-Dimm, IE the following site even has FB-Dimm at 2008 even though FB-Dimm have been release.

It really stupid for AMD to trash FB-Dimm, when with this technology it will allow to take more advantage of 64 bit - because FB-Dimm's allow more memory on system.

Also people sure realized that FB-Dimm's use the same DDR2 and future DDR3 chips that current DDR2 Dimm's used.

RE: AMD's stupidity
By Jellodyne on 6/27/2006 4:57:17 PM , Rating: 2
Another way to allow more memory on systems is to tack a dual channel memory controller onto each processor, which gives you the memory scalability when you need it, ie in large scale systems.

RE: AMD's stupidity
By Viditor on 6/23/2006 11:51:53 AM , Rating: 2
The RSA features of FB-DIMM is unmatched by ECC DDR2. Period

I assume you mean the RAS features...they are only better if you have hooks for them. At this point, Intel does not.

"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer
Related Articles
LGA Opteron F Spy Shots
June 9, 2006, 8:02 PM
Introducing AMD's AM2 Platform
May 22, 2006, 11:41 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki