backtop


Print 30 comment(s) - last by lexluthermiest.. on Jan 24 at 2:27 PM


  (Source: Business Insider)
Ballmer pushes any rising star within Microsoft out before they have the chance to potentially replace him

An ex-Microsoft executive, who will release a new book about his experiences with the company, said that current CEO Steve Ballmer is anything but fit for the role.

Joachim Kempin, a former Microsoft employee from 1983-2002, recently wrote a book called "Resolve and Fortitude: Microsoft's 'Secret Power Broker' Breaks his Silence" that will be published today.

The book details Ballmer's role as CEO, and how he has kept that position for so long. According to Kempin, Ballmer pushes any rising star within Microsoft out before they have the chance to potentially replace him.

Kempin first witnessed this when it happened to Richard Belluzzo, a former Hewlett-Packard executive that launched the Xbox console. He eventually made his way up to chief operating officer, but after only 14 months as COO, Belluzzo left.

"He (Belluzzo) had no room to breathe on the top," said Kempin. "When you work that directly with Ballmer and Ballmer believes 'maybe this guy could someday take over from me', my God, you will have less air to breathe, that's what it comes down to."

Kempin said this also happened with other major Microsoft executives, including Kevin Johnson, a former Windows head that left to run Juniper Networks Inc.; Stephen Elop, a former Office chief that went to Nokia; Ray Ozzie, a software extraordinaire that left to start his own project, and Steven Sinofsky, former Windows chief that left right after Windows 8 launched.

Sinofsky, former president of Microsoft's Windows and Windows Live division, announced that he was leaving the company last November after 23 years with the company. While Sinofsky was seen as a brilliant figure at Microsoft, his downfall was that he didn't get along with others within the company. He was notorious for picking fights with other executives, including Ballmer.

So why exactly does Ballmer feel threatened? According to Kempin, it's because Ballmer isn't fit for the CEO role, and that Microsoft could use a new fresh face at the helm.

"Is he a great CEO? I don't think so," said Kempin. "Microsoft's board is a lame duck board, has been forever. They hire people to help them administer the company, but not to lead the company. That's the problem. They need somebody maybe 35-40 years old, a younger person who understands the Facebook Inc generation and this mobile community. They don't need this guy on stage with this fierce, aggressive look, announcing the next version of Windows and thinking he can score with that."


Source: Reuters



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

...
By fhumphrey04 on 1/22/2013 12:14:19 PM , Rating: 3
Kevin Turner will be the successor to the thrown. He fits the mold of Ballmer in that he's not a true techy, but a great salesman who cares more about numbers than the actual product.

It's incredible that Ballmer has kept the job as long as he has after being consistently rated as one of the worst CEOs in the business. Sure, Microsoft's profits have increased throughout the years, but that's only due to the fact that they're leaching from businesses who have no other choices for business productivity software. That company should be putting more than 50% of it's efforts towards innovating in all realms, but they need the right leader to make that a possibility.

Sinofsky may have been a Jerk, but so was Steve Jobs.




RE: ...
By Ammohunt on 1/22/2013 12:28:59 PM , Rating: 2
Steve Jobs was a genius jerk; Sinofsky appears to just be a jerk.


RE: ...
By Argon18 on 1/22/2013 3:09:41 PM , Rating: 1
That is a good distinction. As much of an ass as Jobs seemed to be, he sure knew how to run a company. Record sales, record quarterly profits, amazing stock price, etc. The guy was absolutely brilliant, both from a technology geek standpoint, and from an executive business standpoint. Like him or not, he was exceptionally good at what he did.


RE: ...
By someguy123 on 1/22/2013 11:32:23 PM , Rating: 4
Steve was not a genius. He literally tried the EXACT same business model years ago and failed miserably, with the exact same campaign. Actually, the current foundation of apple is their sixth run, with the first being the mac "artist appeal" advertising starting with the Ridley Scott commercial, then the imac, and next the switch ads, then the i'm a mac ads, and then one that actually made them relevant again: the ipod campaign.

Personally I believe piracy is what made apple the icon it is today. Who actually filled their ipods with completely legal rips? It allowed you to store ungodly amounts of downloaded albums, which was a huge change from the walkman dominated market before it. If Tony Fadell hadn't wandered around trying to sell his idea I'd bet the farm that apple would still be a niche player.


RE: ...
By johnsmith9875 on 1/24/2013 2:01:49 PM , Rating: 2
NeXT failed because Apple sued Steve Jobs pants off. Apple was flailing in the water but it still had a very good team of shark attorneys more than willing to crush innovation to keep Apple selling tan boxes.


"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Related Articles













botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki