Despite Allegations of Fraud, TSA Lets Scanner Maker Keep Nearly $300M
January 18, 2013 2:00 PM
comment(s) - last by
Secure 1000s will be removed, replaced by another lobbyist-backed firm, L-3
After months of dragging its feet, the
U.S. Transportation Safety Administration
(TSA) has finally caved to
and agreed to remove airport imaging devices which
digitally declothed passengers
in the name of "fighting terrorism".
I. Dirt at Every Turn: OSI's Nude Scanner Push
The scanners in question come from a company called OSI Systems Inc. (
). The device is named the Secure 1000 and is produced by the Rapiscan unit. A number of issues have been raised regarding the scanner. First, while the company insists the backscatter X-rays used are safe, some health experts have suggested that frequent exposure
could cause DNA damage
in frequent fliers, which could in turn lead to cancers.
Then there's the cost and allegations of special interests.
In the wake of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's Christmas 2009 failed attempt to blow up a plane in which he used explosive hidden in his underwear, there was a cry to beef up security at U.S. airports.
The infamous "underwear bomber" triggered the call for body-scanners.
[Image Source: NYP (left), MLive (right)]
In 2010, Congress handed out
a number of large contracts
to scanner manufacturers, with OSI receiving the largest one (a gleaming $173M USD contract to purchase Secure 1000 scanners). You could say OSI had an inside track -- it employed Susan Carr as one of its lobbyists. And Susan Carr had formerly served as a senior legislative aide to Rep. David Price, D-N.C., chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee. Rep. Price, involved with planning the security budget, was pivotal for pushing Rapiscan's large contract.
OSI also contracted former
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) chief Michael Chertoff as a lobbyist. Mr. Chertoff had formerly pushed for trial deployments of the scanner in 2005, at the start of his four-year tenure with the DHS, which concluded in 2009.
Ex-DHS chief Michael Chertoff accepted payments from Rapiscan, even as he was promoting paying the contractor millions of dollars in body scanner contracts. [Image Source: DHS]
Without initially disclosing The Chertoff's Group's contractual relationship with OSI, Mr. Chertoff masqueraded as an independent, unbiased expert putting forth a number of radio interviews in late 2009 and even
writing an op-ed
The Washington Post
. Between Mr. Chertoff and Ms. Carr, OSI had the high profile help it needed to woo Congress.
In addition to the base contract, Congress also awarded Rapiscan with
[PDF] in stimulus funding. It used that money to create a whopping 84 jobs, at a cost of roughly $1.4M USD per job, according to an analysis by
The Huffington Post
of disclosed government records.
Rapiscan was getting a lot of money, but wasn't producing many jobs, but was it at least securing the nation's airports?
Not really, according to numerous government reports. The DHS's own Inspector General in 2010 called training on how to properly use the machines
rushed and poorly supervised
[PDF]. That same year, the
Government Accountability Office
[PDF], "It remains unclear whether [the scanners] would have been able to detect the weapon Mr. Abdulmutallab used."
Backscatter body scanners rely solely on contrast -- making them useless if the weapon or bomb-making supply is held off the body, tests have shown. [Image Source: TSA]
Independent observers also have discussed
how easy it is to trick
the poorly designed instruments.
So if OSI's machines weren't creating jobs, had questionable lobbying ties, were creating potential health risks, and weren't even providing quantifiable increases in security, were they at least protect citizens' privacy?
There were reports of TSA agents making fun of passengers, based on their naked scans, and even a report of a TSA agent assaulting their supervisor after the supervisor began to
joke about their underling's reportedly small genatalia
, which he observed during a training exercise with the scanners.
II. Despite Allegations of Fraud OSI Settles Scanner Matter Quietly
Congress in 2010 ordered OSI to deliver a software update to mask genatalia and breasts in the images. OSI was even paid another $5M USD to perform the update. But at the end of the day, taxpayers got nothing as OSI complained it would be unable to devise an algorithm to properly mask the images until 2014.
Representative Mike Rogers
(R-Alab.), then chairman of the House Transportation Security subcommittee, received a tip that OSI had also faked tests that seemed to show it making some progress with the software. In a letter to TSA Administrator John Pistole, he writes, "[OSI] may have attempted to defraud the government by knowingly manipulating an operational test."
Despite allegedly attempting to defraud taxpayers, OSI was let off the hook, allowed to keep its lucrative contract earnings. [Image Source: Reuters]
In the wake of that report, the TSA began to quietly remove the Secure 1000 scanners from airports. 76 units were shuffled out last year. Now the remaining 174 units will be sent out to pasture as well.
For OSI, which hasn't been able to sell a scanner to the government in two years, the news was actually positive and triggered a jump in share prices. Some had feared that Rep. Rogers' might be able to launch a full-blown fraud probe into the company's testing. While the government decision closes the door on the Secure 1000, OSI gets to pocket the nearly $300M USD the federal government handed it, while facing no threat of fraud charges for its questionable behavior.
Comments Timothy Quillin, a technology analyst with Stephens Inc. in Little Rock, Arkansas,
, "They [OSI] hadn’t really intended to sell more body scanners to airports. To have a resolution to just cancel the contract on the privacy software development is a positive outcome."
John Sanders, the TSA’s assistant administrator for security capabilities even went to bat for OSI, telling
, "We are not pulling them out because they haven’t been effective, and we are not pulling them out for safety reasons. We’re pulling them out because there’s a congressional mandate."
III. No More Scanners? Not While Lobbyists Are Kicking
The DHS insists the scanners are optional and will be allowing
to go through metal detectors instead, to allow for faster processing. Many security experts have suggested that metal detectors, combined with basic pat-downs, are actually better at detecting weapons and explosives than the full body scanners.
But the airports are still expected to feature plenty of scanners from OSI's two major competitors -- American Science and Engineering Inc. (
) and L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. (
). ASE uses backscatter (like Rapiscan), while L-3 uses the newer and supposedly safer millimeter wave technology.
One piece of good news on the privacy front is that while OSI claimed a masking algorithm was impossible, L-3 did deliver a timely masking algorithm for its machines in 2011. This is expected to reduce the embarrassment factor in the scans.
However, questions remain regarding the underlying efficacy of the machines, as does the same question of few jobs in return for huge investments.
And then there's that old dog, special interests. L-3 employs at least three lobbying firms full of D.C. insiders. Among them is
, run by former Sen. Al D'Amato (R-N.Y). Sen. D'Amato served on the President's Commission on Aviation Security and Terrorism in 1989 after being appointed by President George H. W. Bush.
L-3 know how to convince both federal parties to work together to shower it with taxpayer money -- feed the PACs and campaign funds on both sides of the aisle. [Image Source: Anthony Freda]
Showing its tight grip on both sides of the aisle, the company also employs
, wife of former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.). Mrs. Daschle reportedly received over $100,000 for her lobbying work for the company. The company is estimated to have poured over $1.4M USD since 2004 into PACs and candidate campaign funds, in exchange for guarantees of Congressional support.
L-3 received a $163M USD contract from Congress, along with several smaller contracts.
It appears as The Who famously sang, "Meet the new boss / Same as the old boss."
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
1/18/2013 4:35:57 PM
Actually, DHS makes sense. I think it was one of the few good things to come out from all the knee-jerk reactions after 9/11. DHS took a bunch of organizations which already existed in other departments, and consolidated them.
A lot of these previous assignments are WTF? head scratchers. Customs and the Secret Service were in the Treasury. The Coast Guard started off in Treasury, got moved to Transportation, and was kicked into DoD during war. Immigration was in Justice even though they always worked with Customs. A bunch of small agencies which worked closely with Customs were in Agriculture and Energy. FEMA was off doing its own thing. And the dreaded TSA was in Transportation.
So you had a bunch of agencies doing similar things (mostly safeguarding the borders) spread out across all sorts of different departments. It made sense to consolidate them into one department. The department may be doing a lot of boneheaded things, but from an organizational and bureaucratic efficiency standpoint it makes sense for DHS to exist.
1/18/2013 5:21:43 PM
As i understand it the DHS is just another bureaucracy each individual 3 letter agency retained their autonomy they just share data now.....we have too many three letter federal agencies they should be abolished and the their functions and funding moved back under individual state control/management.
1/18/2013 6:01:09 PM
You think there is cronyism in the Federal agencies?
State government has cronyism down to an art form.
1/21/2013 8:45:58 AM
True, but your state can't shovel its $h1t on his if it is handled at the state level. Also, it is a lot easier for people to see how their rights are being violated when they can compare/contrast with other states that are equally safe, but less invasive.
1/22/2013 11:45:09 AM
(mostly safeguarding the borders)
Lol, that's a good one.
"Young lady, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!" -- Homer Simpson
Flaw in TSA Boarding Passes Lets You Print New Tickets to Skip Screening
October 25, 2012, 4:04 PM
Appeals Court Bends Over For TSA, Punts "Prompt" Nude Scanner Hearings
September 27, 2012, 7:29 AM
Security Theater: Engineer Shows TSA Nude Scanners are Useless, Sues TSA
March 7, 2012, 1:08 PM
TSA Defends Its Right to Pat Downs, Nude Scans in Light of Protests
November 24, 2010, 1:10 PM
TSA Worker Assaults Boss After Body Scanner Reveals Genitalia
May 7, 2010, 1:50 PM
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Most Popular Articles
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM
Smart Security Cameras: 5 Good Choices For Any Budget
July 25, 2016, 7:13 PM
2017 Porsche Panamera: I’ll Take Three of These.
July 24, 2016, 6:44 PM
Top 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
5 Excellent Cable Modems: Buy Your Own and Avoid Rental Fees
July 28, 2016, 8:44 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information