Print 19 comment(s) - last by freedom4556.. on Jan 22 at 5:21 PM

Secure 1000s will be removed, replaced by another lobbyist-backed firm, L-3

After months of dragging its feet, the U.S. Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) has finally caved to overwhelming criticism and agreed to remove airport imaging devices which digitally declothed passengers in the name of "fighting terrorism".

I. Dirt at Every Turn: OSI's Nude Scanner Push

The scanners in question come from a company called OSI Systems Inc. (OSIS).  The device is named the Secure 1000 and is produced by the Rapiscan unit.  A number of issues have been raised regarding the scanner.  First, while the company insists the backscatter X-rays used are safe, some health experts have suggested that frequent exposure could cause DNA damage in frequent fliers, which could in turn lead to cancers.

Then there's the cost and allegations of special interests.

In the wake of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab's Christmas 2009 failed attempt to blow up a plane in which he used explosive hidden in his underwear, there was a cry to beef up security at U.S. airports.

Underwear bomber
The infamous "underwear bomber" triggered the call for body-scanners.
[Image Source: NYP (left), MLive (right)]

In 2010, Congress handed out a number of large contracts to scanner manufacturers, with OSI receiving the largest one (a gleaming $173M USD contract to purchase Secure 1000 scanners).  You could say OSI had an inside track -- it employed Susan Carr as one of its lobbyists.  And Susan Carr had formerly served as a senior legislative aide to Rep. David Price, D-N.C., chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee.  Rep. Price, involved with planning the security budget, was pivotal for pushing Rapiscan's large contract.

OSI also contracted former U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) chief Michael Chertoff as a lobbyist.  Mr. Chertoff had formerly pushed for trial deployments of the scanner in 2005, at the start of his four-year tenure with the DHS, which concluded in 2009.  

Michael Chertoff
Ex-DHS chief Michael Chertoff accepted payments from Rapiscan, even as he was promoting paying the contractor millions of dollars in body scanner contracts. [Image Source: DHS]
Without initially disclosing The Chertoff's Group's contractual relationship with OSI, Mr. Chertoff masqueraded as an independent, unbiased expert putting forth a number of radio interviews in late 2009 and even writing an op-ed in The Washington Post.  Between Mr. Chertoff and Ms. Carr, OSI had the high profile help it needed to woo Congress.

In addition to the base contract, Congress also awarded Rapiscan with $118M USD [PDF] in stimulus funding. It used that money to create a whopping 84 jobs, at a cost of roughly $1.4M USD per job, according to an analysis by The Huffington Post of disclosed government records.

Rapiscan was getting a lot of money, but wasn't producing many jobs, but was it at least securing the nation's airports?

Not really, according to numerous government reports.  The DHS's own Inspector General in 2010 called training on how to properly use the machines rushed and poorly supervised [PDF].  That same year, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) wrote [PDF], "It remains unclear whether [the scanners] would have been able to detect the weapon Mr. Abdulmutallab used."

Body scanner images
Backscatter body scanners rely solely on contrast -- making them useless if the weapon or bomb-making supply is held off the body, tests have shown. [Image Source: TSA]
Independent observers also have discussed how easy it is to trick the poorly designed instruments.

So if OSI's machines weren't creating jobs, had questionable lobbying ties, were creating potential health risks, and weren't even providing quantifiable increases in security, were they at least protect citizens' privacy?

Apparently not.

There were reports of TSA agents making fun of passengers, based on their naked scans, and even a report of a TSA agent assaulting their supervisor after the supervisor began to joke about their underling's reportedly small genatalia, which he observed during a training exercise with the scanners.

II. Despite Allegations of Fraud OSI Settles Scanner Matter Quietly

Congress in 2010 ordered OSI to deliver a software update to mask genatalia and breasts in the images.  OSI was even paid another $5M USD to perform the update.  But at the end of the day, taxpayers got nothing as OSI complained it would be unable to devise an algorithm to properly mask the images until 2014.

Representative Mike Rogers (R-Alab.), then chairman of the House Transportation Security subcommittee, received a tip that OSI had also faked tests that seemed to show it making some progress with the software.  In a letter to TSA Administrator John Pistole, he writes, "[OSI] may have attempted to defraud the government by knowingly manipulating an operational test."

Secure 1000
Despite allegedly attempting to defraud taxpayers, OSI was let off the hook, allowed to keep its lucrative contract earnings. [Image Source: Reuters]

In the wake of that report, the TSA began to quietly remove the Secure 1000 scanners from airports.  76 units were shuffled out last year.  Now the remaining 174 units will be sent out to pasture as well.

For OSI, which hasn't been able to sell a scanner to the government in two years, the news was actually positive and triggered a jump in share prices.  Some had feared that Rep. Rogers' might be able to launch a full-blown fraud probe into the company's testing.  While the government decision closes the door on the Secure 1000, OSI gets to pocket the nearly $300M USD the federal government handed it, while facing no threat of fraud charges for its questionable behavior.

Comments Timothy Quillin, a technology analyst with Stephens Inc. in Little Rock, Arkansas, to Bloomberg, "They [OSI] hadn’t really intended to sell more body scanners to airports.  To have a resolution to just cancel the contract on the privacy software development is a positive outcome."

John Sanders, the TSA’s assistant administrator for security capabilities even went to bat for OSI, telling Bloomberg, "We are not pulling them out because they haven’t been effective, and we are not pulling them out for safety reasons.  We’re pulling them out because there’s a congressional mandate."

III. No More Scanners?  Not While Lobbyists Are Kicking

The DHS insists the scanners are optional and will be allowing PreCheck passengers to go through metal detectors instead, to allow for faster processing.  Many security experts have suggested that metal detectors, combined with basic pat-downs, are actually better at detecting weapons and explosives than the full body scanners.

But the airports are still expected to feature plenty of scanners from OSI's two major competitors -- American Science and Engineering Inc. (ASEI) and L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. (LLL).  ASE uses backscatter (like Rapiscan), while L-3 uses the newer and supposedly safer millimeter wave technology.

One piece of good news on the privacy front is that while OSI claimed a masking algorithm was impossible, L-3 did deliver a timely masking algorithm for its machines in 2011.  This is expected to reduce the embarrassment factor in the scans.

However, questions remain regarding the underlying efficacy of the machines, as does the same question of few jobs in return for huge investments.

And then there's that old dog, special interests.  L-3 employs at least three lobbying firms full of D.C. insiders.  Among them is Park Strategies, run by former Sen. Al D'Amato (R-N.Y).  Sen. D'Amato served on the President's Commission on Aviation Security and Terrorism in 1989 after being appointed by President George H. W. Bush.  

Special interests
L-3 know how to convince both federal parties to work together to shower it with taxpayer money -- feed the PACs and campaign funds on both sides of the aisle. [Image Source: Anthony Freda]

Showing its tight grip on both sides of the aisle, the company also employs Linda Daschle, wife of former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.).  Mrs. Daschle reportedly received over $100,000 for her lobbying work for the company.  The company is estimated to have poured over $1.4M USD since 2004 into PACs and candidate campaign funds, in exchange for guarantees of Congressional support.

L-3 received a $163M USD contract from Congress, along with several smaller contracts.

It appears as The Who famously sang, "Meet the new boss / Same as the old boss."

Source: Bloomberg

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Motoman on 1/18/2013 3:09:44 PM , Rating: 5
Despite Allegations of Fraud, TSA Lets Scanner Maker Keep Nearly $300M

What do you expect? The TSA is a fraud itself. Perhaps the greatest fraud ever perpetrated by this government against it's people.

RE: >.<
By Ammohunt on 1/18/2013 3:25:37 PM , Rating: 5
I thought that was the DHS...

RE: >.<
By ImJustSaying on 1/18/2013 3:47:48 PM , Rating: 2
Correct! Take a look at this outstanding series on the Security Industrial Complex, and the fraud that the DHS is, that the Washington Post published last year. It's called Top Secret America. Read it and weep.

RE: >.<
By headbox on 1/18/2013 4:52:51 PM , Rating: 1
So what are you going to do about it? Complain on the internet? Keep voting Red/Blue team into office? If that's all you're going to do about govt fraud, then they will continue to take your money.

RE: >.<
By ImJustSaying on 1/18/2013 7:40:54 PM , Rating: 3
Huh? I was simply agreeing with the comment and posting a link to a published series that is meant to inform the reader. That doesn't qualify as a complaint.

I'm also not sure how you jumped to voting either/or, or voting at all. I didn't say anything about voting this way or that. You are projecting.

And speaking of action, isn't informing yourself a type of action to begin with? It gives you a starting point, so that you can figure out how best to direct your energy and effort. I shouldn't have to explain this to you.

RE: >.<
By Solandri on 1/18/13, Rating: -1
RE: >.<
By Ammohunt on 1/18/2013 5:21:43 PM , Rating: 2
As i understand it the DHS is just another bureaucracy each individual 3 letter agency retained their autonomy they just share data now.....we have too many three letter federal agencies they should be abolished and the their functions and funding moved back under individual state control/management.

RE: >.<
By mcnabney on 1/18/2013 6:01:09 PM , Rating: 2
You think there is cronyism in the Federal agencies?

State government has cronyism down to an art form.

RE: >.<
By JPForums on 1/21/2013 8:45:58 AM , Rating: 2
True, but your state can't shovel its $h1t on his if it is handled at the state level. Also, it is a lot easier for people to see how their rights are being violated when they can compare/contrast with other states that are equally safe, but less invasive.

RE: >.<
By Jeffk464 on 1/22/2013 11:45:09 AM , Rating: 2
(mostly safeguarding the borders)

Lol, that's a good one.

RE: >.<
By Samus on 1/19/2013 12:09:48 PM , Rating: 1
It all started with FEMA. The biggest oxymoron of all government agencies. It was all downhill from there...

"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki