DailyTech - Quick Note: PlayStation 4 Unveil Could Come May 2013 or Sooner

Submit News

Gadgets Quick Note: PlayStation 4 Unveil Could Come May 2013 or Sooner
Tiffany Kaiser - January 16, 2013 12:42 PM

67 comment(s) - last by josh134.. on Jan 24 at 3:33 AM

Hiroshi Sakamoto (Source: at7addak.com)

Sony VP mentioned an E3 announcement, but said a surprise may come in the next few months

After releasing the PlayStation 3 console just over six years ago, it looks like Sony is ready to launch its successor as early as this spring.

Hiroshi Sakamoto, Sony's vice president of home entertainment, recently gave some vague details about when we'll finally see the PlayStation 4 in an interview with Chilean site Emol. According to Sakamoto, the PS4 could make an appearance as early as May of this year.

However, Sony's VP was asked whether the new console could make an earlier entrance within the next few months.

"That's still a big secret, but our friends are preparing Sony PlayStation," said Sakamoto in the interview. "I can only say that we are focused on the E3 gaming event, scheduled for June. [An] announcement may be [made] in that minute or even earlier in May."

It is rumored that the PS 4 will have a custom chip based on AMD's A8-3850 with a quad-core 2.9GHz processor and a 1GHz graphics card with 1GB memory.

Source: CNET

Comments

Threshold

Username
Password
remember me

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Lousy Specs

By nafhan on 1/17/2013 12:42:23 PM , Rating: 2

quote:
AMD, the company who knows how to build fast chips for much lower price than Intel.

I don't think that's true. AMD is the company that's willing to sell what are - quite likely - MORE EXPENSIVE to build chips at a lower price. The "bang for the buck" has to do with end user pricing and performance NOT AMD's costs.

I don't think it's completely unreasonable to believe that Intel could provide competitive (or better) pricing for a volume customer such as Sony; they just don't want to for whatever reason. That reason is probably Intel could make more money selling chips to someone else.

It's also possible that Sony may have gone with AMD for GPU related reasons, rather than price.

Also curious: what's happening in console gaming that's going to make it "heavily multithreaded" all of a sudden?

Parent