Print 30 comment(s) - last by lexluthermiest.. on Jan 13 at 2:21 AM

K900 looks good, but looks to be just for Chinese consumption

Lenovo is looking to make some waves in the smartphone market with its new K900 "superphone". Most were wowed by Sony's impressive Xperia Z with its 5" 1080p display, but Lenovo's K900 is sporting a 5.5" display while still retaining 1080p resolution (this also means that it will have a slightly lower pixel density than the Xperia Z).
Under the screen, the K900 is powered by Intel's Clover Trail+ platform. To go with that firepower, 2GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage are also in the cards. More impressively, Lenovo has managed to toss in a 13MP camera with a F1.8 focal length lens, dual-LED flash, and the requisite front-facing camera for video chat.
The device itself is 6.9mm thick and weighs just 5.7 ounces. The body of the phone is a mixture of polycarbonate and stainless steel that gives it a nice, business-like exterior.
“With the K900, our team has broken down the key functions of the smartphone and redesigned them from the ground up,” said Liu Jun, president, Mobile Internet Digital Home, and senior vice president, Lenovo. “Rather than focus on specifications that look good on a datasheet, we’ve zeroed in on what consumers want and proved that for smartphone users, top performance doesn’t require a thick profile. The K900 is a game-changer that looks as good as it performs.”
Unfortunately, it looks as though Lenovo is targeting the K900 primarily at the Chinese market and a few other select markets. There's no word on when (or if) it will be available to a U.S. audience. At least Sony has enough confidence to market its “superphone” in the U.S.

Source: Lenovo

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Nice phone
By retrospooty on 1/9/2013 8:57:20 AM , Rating: 2
LOL, yes thats what we all want smaller screens with lower res. I think we should also push for slower processorrs and less battery life, and while we are at it, lets lose 4G and Wifi... why the hell not ;)

RE: Nice phone
By inighthawki on 1/9/2013 4:54:11 PM , Rating: 3
At 4", 720 is almost the same DP as a 5.5" 1080p display, but has huge savings in power.

RE: Nice phone
By inighthawki on 1/9/2013 5:45:54 PM , Rating: 2

RE: Nice phone
By retrospooty on 1/9/2013 7:10:22 PM , Rating: 2
Yes, DPI is appx. equal, but viewing area is way too small.

I get why some people like it, and that's fine, but really, when you think about all the great things we can to on todays smartphones (all of them from IOS to Android to WP8 to other smaller players) to have all that greatness is wasted on a tiny screen. Thus the reason large screens are becoming more and more popular and the high end is getting bigger and bigger with each new generation of products that come out.

I am telling ya man, give it a shot on your next phone go 4.7 to 5 inches. You wont go back. What you lose with a larger phone in your pocket and super easy one handed access is gained back 10x in usability and sheer awesome factor. Watch an HD show or movie on Netflix or play a game on an iPhone and one a 4.7+ inch and you wont go back.

RE: Nice phone
By inighthawki on 1/9/2013 10:02:24 PM , Rating: 2
I guess that's the huge difference, I don't watch videos or play games on my phone. I use apps, browse the web, etc, but the extent of video playback I do is a 3 min youtube video here and there, hardly demanding of a large full HD display. To each his own, but I prefer the smaller form factor of a ~4" phone to that of ~5". If I get the chance I will take your advice and give it a shot, but I really don't see it changing much.

I tend to favor battery life over most aspects of the phone. Smaller screens will save a lot of power from physical backlight size, Lower resolutions from a drastic reduction in graphics processing, and lower DPIs benefit from having comparable brightness levels without putting as much power into the backlight itself, since the lower pixel density restricts less light from showing through.

In most cases quad core processors are also mostly useless, as phones very rarely benefit from having greater than two cores. One for system tasks and one for the active process, everything else is suspended. Very few phone applications benefit from a multi-threaded environment. Apple is one who caught on to this. As you may note, their A6 is only a dual core processor. Having 4 cores rarely adds much, and often just drains the battery faster because there is often not aggressive enough power management built into the hardware.

RE: Nice phone
By retrospooty on 1/10/2013 12:37:35 PM , Rating: 2
Everything you do on the phone is better, browsing is anotehr huge one I should have mentioned. far less pinching nad zooming and more just reading the site.

"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings
Related Articles

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki