Print 129 comment(s) - last by acturbo.. on Jan 13 at 1:51 PM

Windows 7 had more than 10 times the usage at this point in its lifecycle

Three weeks after its 2009 launch, Windows 7 had seized 4 percent of the operating system (OS) market, and would go on to become the fastest selling OS in Microsoft Corp.'s (MSFT) history.  Three years later and Microsoft has another release -- Windows 8.  But some signs point to the operating system as being a sales bust, early on.

Microsoft had bragged weeks ago that it had sold 40 million licenses, a number that it said surpassed sales of Windows 7 for an equivalent period in 2009.  But some complained that license sales were not actual device sales; they cite reports of Windows 8 computers languishing on store shelves.

Now the critics have ammo to back those claims. Market research group Net Applications, a research service that tracks traffic across 8,000 affiliates' sites and 3 million registered users, reports that Windows 8 at the end of December accounted for a mere 1.72 percent of traffic.  

In other words, after two months Windows 8 appears to have about a third of market share Windows 7 garnered in less than one month.  By two months into its lifecycle, Windows 7 has soared to 21 percent of the market's traffic (Windows 7 is now the top PC OS with 45 percent of traffic).
Windows 8 Surface
Windows 8's adoption pace appears to be more sluggish than Windows Vista's.
[Image Source: Microsoft]

Windows 8's numbers look more like those of Windows Vista -- but even a bit worse.  Vista posted about 2.2 percent of the total traffic at the same 2-month point, about a third more than Windows 8's percentage [source].

Merle McIntosh, a product manager SVP at top online computer retailer Newegg, was cautious in his criticism, confirming that Windows 8 "did not explode" onto the market. But he remains hopeful, noting that sales have been slowly creeping upward.

Windows 8 is an incredibly bold redesign on the part on Microsoft.  While, the move to a more touch-friendlygraphically rich operating system certainly mirrors the general direction of the device market, but that has done little to shield Microsoft from loads of criticism. Many have wondered whether it went too far with the graphical gloss, whether it was disrespecting developers with its shift to a walled-garden "Windows Store" app distribution model, and whether it was forsaking traditional desktop power users.

So will Windows 8 be the next Vista sales wise?  The critics certainly would say so.  But at this point it's kind of early to say; about all that's safe to say is that the picture might not be as rosy as Microsoft wanted you to believe.

Sources: Net Applications, ComputerWorld, ReadWriteWeb

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: The only thing that interests me in Windows 8
By twhittet on 1/4/2013 2:03:37 PM , Rating: 5
This coming from a troll of Windows 8 UI.

Everytime I see someone voice their opinion about the interface, I see you saying "I really don't know why everyone claims to have such a hard time with it, but I really believe those people have not actually used it."

We think it sux. We have used it for months. We have used it as primary systems, we have used it on laptops, we have used it as HTPCs. So we HAVE used it, and you just like to assume EVERYONE who ever complaints about it is stupid and/or "have not actually used it".

The sales numbers and general opinions tell a clear picture - people do not like the UI. So stop pretending they don't just because you are in love with it.

RE: The only thing that interests me in Windows 8
By kleinma on 1/4/2013 2:14:48 PM , Rating: 1
I just don't understand why everyone cries soooo much about the start screen. All it did was replace the start menu. Were you that in love with the start menu from windows? Did you really spend a good portion of your day in the start menu launching programs? I think Windows 8 is far from perfect, I just think people tend to bitch about things just to bitch about them. Ohhh no, they made the start menu full screen, the sky is falling!!!

By cyberguyz on 1/4/2013 4:22:27 PM , Rating: 5
If it were just the start screen, I would still be using it. They also f**ked uup the actual desktop as well.

I have a registered copy of Windows 8. I also have access to it via my MSDN subscription. I've used it for months and have found that i just simply hate it. Why did I have the top version of Windows 8 available and still have to PAY MICROSOFT EVEN MORE for Media Center? Seriously?

This was written on my Desktop PC running Windows 7 x64 Ultimate. The Windows 8 DVD sits in a corner with all the other dvds full of lame software that I will never use again.

No some will love the WIndows 8 UI. But the rest of us are voting wioth our wallets and telling Microsoft in no uncertain terms that we are not impressed with the latest incarnation of their operating system.

By cyberguyz on 1/4/2013 4:23:57 PM , Rating: 2
and as you can see- I can't type worth a sh!t.

RE: The only thing that interests me in Windows 8
By kleinma on 1/4/2013 7:15:21 PM , Rating: 2
If you are going to say something like "They also f**ked uup the actual desktop as well." then you could at least elaborate on what you mean. Minus a start button, my desktop is exactly the same as the windows 7 one.

RE: The only thing that interests me in Windows 8
By althaz on 1/5/2013 3:15:42 AM , Rating: 2
That's demonstrably not true. Windows 8 adds back the "Up" button in the File Explorer, adds very useful backup features, it's faster and more responsive, it starts up quicker, it is 1000x times better at copying files (to be fair Windows 7 and earlier were incredibly bad at it), there's (much) improved multi-monitor support, better class-drivers, better cloud integration, more keyboard shortcuts and probably more stuff that I've missed.

As an added bonus the start screen is many times better than the truly crappy start menu. It let's you find your most used programs much more easily than the desktop or start menu ever have, plus as an added bonus every time you launch an app that isn't on your taskbar, you don't lost your entire windows hierarchy.

The Start Screen is also a great place to check if you have any appointments or messages, what the weather is or if there's any updates on Facebook or Twitter. It's optional, but it is actually useful.

Much worse of course is the whole concept of metro apps, the best thing about windows apps is the windows, why can't metro apps support multiple fixed-sizes of window as well as full screen? This is the fundamental flaw of Windows 8, just about everything else about it is actually better.

By overzealot on 1/5/2013 6:08:13 PM , Rating: 5
Nope. I tried using the start screen for a month, then bought Start8.
2 reasons:
- Having to click Desktop on startup to get out of Start Screen (if you could leave it by pressing the Win key I wouldn't have cared).
- I still find it much easier to click things on the Start menu when searching. Dragging the cursor to the bottom left completely (no aim required) then a slight readjustment is a massive gain for mouse users on high resolution desktops. And far less distracting animated tiles to worry about as well.

I used the metro PDF reader for a while, but like all metro apps, it's great until you want to close them. The best way to dismiss them is to just go back to desktop (top left charm) but I really just want to close it. That leaves me with Alt-F4 or dragging from top to bottom - which once again, doesn't work well with a mouse on a high-res desktop, and both of these choices still drops you back at Start Screen.

There's plenty I like about Windows 8, but its insistence on pushing Metro on me is not one of them.

By Sta5h on 1/7/2013 7:11:10 AM , Rating: 2
(if you could leave it by pressing the Win key I wouldn't have cared).
Err, well I can :D

I completely agree that removing the Start button was a mistake for most users, but really, about 30 seconds training from me has made several over fifties "MS Office" style users completely happy with Windows 8 and commenting on how their desktop/laptop feels faster. This is from in-place *upgrading* their Windows 7 installations.

Agreed on the Metro PDF and Picture viewer apps though, they're pretty terrible IMO.

Seriously, I'm finding very little to dislike about Windows 8 (the operating system) and a lot to like about it.

By hood6558 on 1/7/2013 8:41:37 PM , Rating: 1
I agree with your assessment; Windows 8 is better in enough ways that I'd feel I was missing something if I went back to 7. The start screen UI is useless on a desktop, but easily avoided with Start8 or a simple registry hack. I have a new Z77/i5/SSD system that runs smoother and faster on Windows 8, which was designed purposefully to take advantage of new memory controllers, fast SSDs, CPU architecture, chipset features, etc. I believe it's really the most "mature"
OS available, under the hood. Too bad all most people see is the teenage girl phone UI and instantly decide that it can't be any good in any way. Maybe it had to be done to stay with changing markets, that I can understand. But to not give the choice to eliminate or bypass the blatantly greed-inspired "Metro" and "Windows Store" aspect was a bad mistake. They could have been a hero had they given the choice, and the stupid store and all it's useless "apps" would have to live or die on it's own merits. I looked through a lot of apps trying to find anything worth using, tried 2 radio apps and a wiki app, all crashed or were so slow to load as to render them useless. But to pay money for these useless things would be utter stupidity. They need to separate the mobile side from the desktop side from the enterprise side, just as they have always done. Don't force the desktop team or the enterprise guys to work with kiddy toys.

By cyberguyz on 1/6/2013 11:25:42 AM , Rating: 3
"If you are going to say something like "They also f**ked uup the actual desktop as well." then you could at least elaborate on what you mean. Minus a start button, my desktop is exactly the same as the windows 7 one. "

Are you blind? Where is the Aero theme. For that matter where is ANY desktop theme? What they replaced the Aero theme with is this flat-color with absolutely no character at all. In short they replaced the Aero desktop with Win-7's "lite" desktop and gave you no way to enhance it t all.

Start menu gone. Before you say the Win 8 start menu is soooo much better, realize you have to endure a jarring swap OUT OF the desktop to get to it. Also realize the Win 8 start panel is absoutely desktop UN-friendly.

Win7's start menu is at least still on the desktop. I don't have to LEAVE THE DESKTOP.

Say what you want about the desktop gadgets in Win-7, but I like them and have a system powerful enough to support them. Does Win8 have them? Nope.

What about Media Center? I opted to upgrade Win 7 Ultimate to Win 8 Pro. Guess what, no Media Center. Microsoft now wants you to pay extra for that. Why should I have to? I had it in Win 7 Ulti. When I upgrade Win 7 ulti, i expect that to be upgraded too. I didn't get MORE like I would expect with an upgrade software. I got less!

The start menu and gadgets issues can be resolved by jumping thru some 3rd party hoops. The missing media center can be 'purchased' from microsoft. But why should I have to? Just to get that lame Metro garbage? I don't even like it.

So did Microsoft fuckup the Win 8 desktop? Damn right they did!

Is that elaboration enough for you?

By timothyd97402 on 1/4/2013 4:33:49 PM , Rating: 4
Yes, I really like the start menu. I have two Windows 8 computers and the one I use alot has a 3rd party start menu replacement. It also disables the hot corners and boots me straight to the desktop. I have also set my defaults as much as possible to use desktop programs rather than Metro apps.

I do not use any Metro apps and have no need or desire to do so. I use professional desktop programs exclusively. Why does Microsoft insist that I must be switched over to the Metro UI at any excuse?

By JediJeb on 1/4/2013 7:53:37 PM , Rating: 2
Did you really spend a good portion of your day in the start menu launching programs

I rarely use the Start menu because I do what most hate as much as the Metro interface, I put my shortcut icons on my desktop. I happen to arrange them around the edges where they take up very little space, unlike the metro tiles that take up the whole screen so that I can arrange my working windows stacked around the screen leaving the icons available to open other programs quickly without having to move, minimize or close the others. With large screens it is more efficient to have several programs open and available than having to constantly switch from one to another in full screen mode.

Also I don't really like the live tiles where stuff is always playing even when you are not interested in it. Seems like that would just be wasting processor time and battery life.

By Mike Acker on 1/5/2013 7:55:59 AM , Rating: 2
i've followed this whole brouhaha from the inception of the "Ribbon Menu"

everyone I had to help with it hated it intensely: the presentation of "everything at once" -- as advocated by Julie L-G -- just doesn't work -- for a lot of us .

By Piiman on 1/5/2013 9:46:31 AM , Rating: 2
"I just don't understand why everyone cries soooo much about the start screen. All it did was replace the start menu. Were you that in love with the start menu from windows?"

Dude even you added it? lol

By delphinus100 on 1/6/2013 1:43:21 AM , Rating: 3
I just don't understand why everyone cries soooo much about the start screen. All it did was replace the start menu.

First, yes I do miss the Start Menu. But...

When I start up a Windows machine, once at the desktop I typically either click an icon to open a program, or an Internet shortcut I've created, to go to a particular site.

Going to the Start Menu is rarely the first thing I do.

So, why would I want to be presented with the Start Menu's 'replacement' every time I boot up the computer?

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki